* Patch "f2fs: fix fs corruption due to zero inode page" has been added to the 4.10-stable tree
@ 2017-05-18 7:44 gregkh
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: gregkh @ 2017-05-18 7:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: jaegeuk, gregkh; +Cc: stable, stable-commits
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
f2fs: fix fs corruption due to zero inode page
to the 4.10-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
f2fs-fix-fs-corruption-due-to-zero-inode-page.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.10 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From 9bb02c3627f46e50246bf7ab957b56ffbef623cb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 19:01:26 -0700
Subject: f2fs: fix fs corruption due to zero inode page
From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
commit 9bb02c3627f46e50246bf7ab957b56ffbef623cb upstream.
This patch fixes the following scenario.
- f2fs_create/f2fs_mkdir - write_checkpoint
- f2fs_mark_inode_dirty_sync - block_operations
- f2fs_lock_all
- f2fs_sync_inode_meta
- f2fs_unlock_all
- sync_inode_metadata
- f2fs_lock_op
- f2fs_write_inode
- update_inode_page
- get_node_page
return -ENOENT
- new_inode_page
- fill_node_footer
- f2fs_mark_inode_dirty_sync
- ...
- f2fs_unlock_op
- f2fs_inode_synced
- f2fs_lock_all
- do_checkpoint
In this checkpoint, we can get an inode page which contains zeros having valid
node footer only.
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
fs/f2fs/inode.c | 2 +-
fs/f2fs/namei.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/f2fs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/inode.c
@@ -316,7 +316,6 @@ retry:
} else if (err != -ENOENT) {
f2fs_stop_checkpoint(sbi, false);
}
- f2fs_inode_synced(inode);
return 0;
}
ret = update_inode(inode, node_page);
@@ -446,6 +445,7 @@ void handle_failed_inode(struct inode *i
* in a panic when flushing dirty inodes in gdirty_list.
*/
update_inode_page(inode);
+ f2fs_inode_synced(inode);
/* don't make bad inode, since it becomes a regular file. */
unlock_new_inode(inode);
--- a/fs/f2fs/namei.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/namei.c
@@ -148,8 +148,6 @@ static int f2fs_create(struct inode *dir
inode->i_mapping->a_ops = &f2fs_dblock_aops;
ino = inode->i_ino;
- f2fs_balance_fs(sbi, true);
-
f2fs_lock_op(sbi);
err = f2fs_add_link(dentry, inode);
if (err)
@@ -163,6 +161,8 @@ static int f2fs_create(struct inode *dir
if (IS_DIRSYNC(dir))
f2fs_sync_fs(sbi->sb, 1);
+
+ f2fs_balance_fs(sbi, true);
return 0;
out:
handle_failed_inode(inode);
@@ -423,8 +423,6 @@ static int f2fs_symlink(struct inode *di
inode_nohighmem(inode);
inode->i_mapping->a_ops = &f2fs_dblock_aops;
- f2fs_balance_fs(sbi, true);
-
f2fs_lock_op(sbi);
err = f2fs_add_link(dentry, inode);
if (err)
@@ -487,6 +485,8 @@ err_out:
}
kfree(sd);
+
+ f2fs_balance_fs(sbi, true);
return err;
out:
handle_failed_inode(inode);
@@ -508,8 +508,6 @@ static int f2fs_mkdir(struct inode *dir,
inode->i_mapping->a_ops = &f2fs_dblock_aops;
mapping_set_gfp_mask(inode->i_mapping, GFP_F2FS_HIGH_ZERO);
- f2fs_balance_fs(sbi, true);
-
set_inode_flag(inode, FI_INC_LINK);
f2fs_lock_op(sbi);
err = f2fs_add_link(dentry, inode);
@@ -524,6 +522,8 @@ static int f2fs_mkdir(struct inode *dir,
if (IS_DIRSYNC(dir))
f2fs_sync_fs(sbi->sb, 1);
+
+ f2fs_balance_fs(sbi, true);
return 0;
out_fail:
@@ -554,8 +554,6 @@ static int f2fs_mknod(struct inode *dir,
init_special_inode(inode, inode->i_mode, rdev);
inode->i_op = &f2fs_special_inode_operations;
- f2fs_balance_fs(sbi, true);
-
f2fs_lock_op(sbi);
err = f2fs_add_link(dentry, inode);
if (err)
@@ -569,6 +567,8 @@ static int f2fs_mknod(struct inode *dir,
if (IS_DIRSYNC(dir))
f2fs_sync_fs(sbi->sb, 1);
+
+ f2fs_balance_fs(sbi, true);
return 0;
out:
handle_failed_inode(inode);
@@ -595,8 +595,6 @@ static int __f2fs_tmpfile(struct inode *
inode->i_mapping->a_ops = &f2fs_dblock_aops;
}
- f2fs_balance_fs(sbi, true);
-
f2fs_lock_op(sbi);
err = acquire_orphan_inode(sbi);
if (err)
@@ -622,6 +620,8 @@ static int __f2fs_tmpfile(struct inode *
/* link_count was changed by d_tmpfile as well. */
f2fs_unlock_op(sbi);
unlock_new_inode(inode);
+
+ f2fs_balance_fs(sbi, true);
return 0;
release_out:
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from jaegeuk@kernel.org are
queue-4.10/f2fs-fix-fs-corruption-due-to-zero-inode-page.patch
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2017-05-18 7:44 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-05-18 7:44 Patch "f2fs: fix fs corruption due to zero inode page" has been added to the 4.10-stable tree gregkh
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).