Patch "af_unix: Guard against other == sk in unix_dgram_sendmsg" has been added to the 3.18-stable tree

Patch "af_unix: Guard against other == sk in unix_dgram_sendmsg" has been added to the 3.18-stable tree

[gregkh]

This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    af_unix: Guard against other == sk in unix_dgram_sendmsg

to the 3.18-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     af_unix-guard-against-other-sk-in-unix_dgram_sendmsg.patch
and it can be found in the queue-3.18 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.


>From a5527dda344fff0514b7989ef7a755729769daa1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mobileactivedefense.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 19:37:27 +0000
Subject: af_unix: Guard against other == sk in unix_dgram_sendmsg

From: Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mobileactivedefense.com>

commit a5527dda344fff0514b7989ef7a755729769daa1 upstream.

The unix_dgram_sendmsg routine use the following test

if (unlikely(unix_peer(other) != sk && unix_recvq_full(other))) {

to determine if sk and other are in an n:1 association (either
established via connect or by using sendto to send messages to an
unrelated socket identified by address). This isn't correct as the
specified address could have been bound to the sending socket itself or
because this socket could have been connected to itself by the time of
the unix_peer_get but disconnected before the unix_state_lock(other). In
both cases, the if-block would be entered despite other == sk which
might either block the sender unintentionally or lead to trying to unlock
the same spin lock twice for a non-blocking send. Add a other != sk
check to guard against this.

Fixes: 7d267278a9ec ("unix: avoid use-after-free in ep_remove_wait_queue")
Reported-By: Philipp Hahn <pmhahn@pmhahn.de>
Signed-off-by: Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mobileactivedefense.com>
Tested-by: Philipp Hahn <pmhahn@pmhahn.de>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Amit Pundir <amit.pundir@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 net/unix/af_unix.c |    7 ++++++-
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/net/unix/af_unix.c
+++ b/net/unix/af_unix.c
@@ -1722,7 +1722,12 @@ restart_locked:
 			goto out_unlock;
 	}
 
-	if (unlikely(unix_peer(other) != sk && unix_recvq_full(other))) {
+	/* other == sk && unix_peer(other) != sk if
+	 * - unix_peer(sk) == NULL, destination address bound to sk
+	 * - unix_peer(sk) == sk by time of get but disconnected before lock
+	 */
+	if (other != sk &&
+	    unlikely(unix_peer(other) != sk && unix_recvq_full(other))) {
 		if (timeo) {
 			timeo = unix_wait_for_peer(other, timeo);
 


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from rweikusat@mobileactivedefense.com are

queue-3.18/af_unix-guard-against-other-sk-in-unix_dgram_sendmsg.patch