From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: vegard.nossum@oracle.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: patch "tty: fix port buffer locking" added to tty-linus
Date: Thu, 18 May 2017 16:44:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1495118659120203@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
tty: fix port buffer locking
to my tty git tree which can be found at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/tty.git
in the tty-linus branch.
The patch will show up in the next release of the linux-next tree
(usually sometime within the next 24 hours during the week.)
The patch will hopefully also be merged in Linus's tree for the
next -rc kernel release.
If you have any questions about this process, please let me know.
>From 925bb1ce47f429f69aad35876df7ecd8c53deb7e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@oracle.com>
Date: Thu, 11 May 2017 12:18:52 +0200
Subject: tty: fix port buffer locking
tty_insert_flip_string_fixed_flag() is racy against itself when called
from the ioctl(TCXONC, TCION/TCIOFF) path [1] and the flush_to_ldisc()
workqueue path [2].
The problem is that port->buf.tail->used is modified without consistent
locking; the ioctl path takes tty->atomic_write_lock, whereas the workqueue
path takes ldata->output_lock.
We cannot simply take ldata->output_lock, since that is specific to the
N_TTY line discipline.
It might seem natural to try to take port->buf.lock inside
tty_insert_flip_string_fixed_flag() and friends (where port->buf is
actually used/modified), but this creates problems for flush_to_ldisc()
which takes it before grabbing tty->ldisc_sem, o_tty->termios_rwsem,
and ldata->output_lock.
Therefore, the simplest solution for now seems to be to take
tty->atomic_write_lock inside tty_port_default_receive_buf(). This lock
is also used in the write path [3] with a consistent ordering.
[1]: Call Trace:
tty_insert_flip_string_fixed_flag
pty_write
tty_send_xchar // down_read(&o_tty->termios_rwsem)
// mutex_lock(&tty->atomic_write_lock)
n_tty_ioctl_helper
n_tty_ioctl
tty_ioctl // down_read(&tty->ldisc_sem)
do_vfs_ioctl
SyS_ioctl
[2]: Workqueue: events_unbound flush_to_ldisc
Call Trace:
tty_insert_flip_string_fixed_flag
pty_write
tty_put_char
__process_echoes
commit_echoes // mutex_lock(&ldata->output_lock)
n_tty_receive_buf_common
n_tty_receive_buf2
tty_ldisc_receive_buf // down_read(&o_tty->termios_rwsem)
tty_port_default_receive_buf // down_read(&tty->ldisc_sem)
flush_to_ldisc // mutex_lock(&port->buf.lock)
process_one_work
[3]: Call Trace:
tty_insert_flip_string_fixed_flag
pty_write
n_tty_write // mutex_lock(&ldata->output_lock)
// down_read(&tty->termios_rwsem)
do_tty_write (inline) // mutex_lock(&tty->atomic_write_lock)
tty_write // down_read(&tty->ldisc_sem)
__vfs_write
vfs_write
SyS_write
The bug can result in about a dozen different crashes depending on what
exactly gets corrupted when port->buf.tail->used points outside the
buffer.
The patch passes my LOCKDEP/PROVE_LOCKING testing but more testing is
always welcome.
Found using syzkaller.
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/tty/tty_port.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/tty/tty_port.c b/drivers/tty/tty_port.c
index 0c880f17d27e..88dac3b79369 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/tty_port.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/tty_port.c
@@ -33,7 +33,9 @@ static int tty_port_default_receive_buf(struct tty_port *port,
if (!disc)
return 0;
+ mutex_lock(&tty->atomic_write_lock);
ret = tty_ldisc_receive_buf(disc, p, (char *)f, count);
+ mutex_unlock(&tty->atomic_write_lock);
tty_ldisc_deref(disc);
--
2.13.0
reply other threads:[~2017-05-18 14:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1495118659120203@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vegard.nossum@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).