stable.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: wanpeng.li@hotmail.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
	pbonzini@redhat.com, rkrcmar@redhat.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "KVM: x86: Fix potential preemption when get the current kvmclock timestamp" has been added to the 4.9-stable tree
Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 18:41:20 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1495471280130243@kroah.com> (raw)


This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    KVM: x86: Fix potential preemption when get the current kvmclock timestamp

to the 4.9-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     kvm-x86-fix-potential-preemption-when-get-the-current-kvmclock-timestamp.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.9 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.


>From e2c2206a18993bc9f62393d49c7b2066c3845b25 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@hotmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 May 2017 18:12:05 -0700
Subject: KVM: x86: Fix potential preemption when get the current kvmclock timestamp
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

From: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@hotmail.com>

commit e2c2206a18993bc9f62393d49c7b2066c3845b25 upstream.

 BUG: using __this_cpu_read() in preemptible [00000000] code: qemu-system-x86/2809
 caller is __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x13/0x20
 CPU: 2 PID: 2809 Comm: qemu-system-x86 Not tainted 4.11.0+ #13
 Call Trace:
  dump_stack+0x99/0xce
  check_preemption_disabled+0xf5/0x100
  __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x13/0x20
  get_kvmclock_ns+0x6f/0x110 [kvm]
  get_time_ref_counter+0x5d/0x80 [kvm]
  kvm_hv_process_stimers+0x2a1/0x8a0 [kvm]
  ? kvm_hv_process_stimers+0x2a1/0x8a0 [kvm]
  ? kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run+0xac9/0x1ce0 [kvm]
  kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run+0x5bf/0x1ce0 [kvm]
  kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x384/0x7b0 [kvm]
  ? kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x384/0x7b0 [kvm]
  ? __fget+0xf3/0x210
  do_vfs_ioctl+0xa4/0x700
  ? __fget+0x114/0x210
  SyS_ioctl+0x79/0x90
  entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x23/0xc2
 RIP: 0033:0x7f9d164ed357
  ? __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x13/0x20

This can be reproduced by run kvm-unit-tests/hyperv_stimer.flat w/
CONFIG_PREEMPT and CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT enabled.

Safe access to per-CPU data requires a couple of constraints, though: the
thread working with the data cannot be preempted and it cannot be migrated
while it manipulates per-CPU variables. If the thread is preempted, the
thread that replaces it could try to work with the same variables; migration
to another CPU could also cause confusion. However there is no preemption
disable when reads host per-CPU tsc rate to calculate the current kvmclock
timestamp.

This patch fixes it by utilizing get_cpu/put_cpu pair to guarantee both
__this_cpu_read() and rdtsc() are not preempted.

Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@hotmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 arch/x86/kvm/x86.c |   10 +++++++++-
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -1735,6 +1735,7 @@ static u64 __get_kvmclock_ns(struct kvm
 {
 	struct kvm_arch *ka = &kvm->arch;
 	struct pvclock_vcpu_time_info hv_clock;
+	u64 ret;
 
 	spin_lock(&ka->pvclock_gtod_sync_lock);
 	if (!ka->use_master_clock) {
@@ -1746,10 +1747,17 @@ static u64 __get_kvmclock_ns(struct kvm
 	hv_clock.system_time = ka->master_kernel_ns + ka->kvmclock_offset;
 	spin_unlock(&ka->pvclock_gtod_sync_lock);
 
+	/* both __this_cpu_read() and rdtsc() should be on the same cpu */
+	get_cpu();
+
 	kvm_get_time_scale(NSEC_PER_SEC, __this_cpu_read(cpu_tsc_khz) * 1000LL,
 			   &hv_clock.tsc_shift,
 			   &hv_clock.tsc_to_system_mul);
-	return __pvclock_read_cycles(&hv_clock, rdtsc());
+	ret = __pvclock_read_cycles(&hv_clock, rdtsc());
+
+	put_cpu();
+
+	return ret;
 }
 
 u64 get_kvmclock_ns(struct kvm *kvm)


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from wanpeng.li@hotmail.com are

queue-4.9/kvm-x86-fix-potential-preemption-when-get-the-current-kvmclock-timestamp.patch
queue-4.9/kvm-x86-fix-load-damaged-ssex-mxcsr-register.patch
queue-4.9/kvm-x86-fix-read-out-of-bounds-vulnerability-in-kvm-pio-emulation.patch

                 reply	other threads:[~2017-05-22 16:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1495471280130243@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
    --cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=wanpeng.li@hotmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).