* Patch "drm/amdgpu: Make display watermark calculations more accurate" has been added to the 4.9-stable tree
@ 2017-05-22 17:04 gregkh
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: gregkh @ 2017-05-22 17:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mario.kleiner.de, alexander.deucher, gregkh; +Cc: stable, stable-commits
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
drm/amdgpu: Make display watermark calculations more accurate
to the 4.9-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
drm-amdgpu-make-display-watermark-calculations-more-accurate.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.9 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From d63c277dc672e0c568481af043359420fa9d4736 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mario Kleiner <mario.kleiner.de@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 22:09:11 +0200
Subject: drm/amdgpu: Make display watermark calculations more accurate
From: Mario Kleiner <mario.kleiner.de@gmail.com>
commit d63c277dc672e0c568481af043359420fa9d4736 upstream.
Avoid big roundoff errors in scanline/hactive durations for
high pixel clocks, especially for >= 500 Mhz, and thereby
program more accurate display fifo watermarks.
Implemented here for DCE 6,8,10,11.
Successfully tested on DCE 10 with AMD R9 380 Tonga.
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Mario Kleiner <mario.kleiner.de@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/dce_v10_0.c | 10 +++++-----
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/dce_v11_0.c | 10 +++++-----
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/dce_v6_0.c | 10 +++++-----
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/dce_v8_0.c | 10 +++++-----
4 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/dce_v10_0.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/dce_v10_0.c
@@ -1297,14 +1297,14 @@ static void dce_v10_0_program_watermarks
{
struct drm_display_mode *mode = &amdgpu_crtc->base.mode;
struct dce10_wm_params wm_low, wm_high;
- u32 pixel_period;
+ u32 active_time;
u32 line_time = 0;
u32 latency_watermark_a = 0, latency_watermark_b = 0;
u32 tmp, wm_mask, lb_vblank_lead_lines = 0;
if (amdgpu_crtc->base.enabled && num_heads && mode) {
- pixel_period = 1000000 / (u32)mode->clock;
- line_time = min((u32)mode->crtc_htotal * pixel_period, (u32)65535);
+ active_time = 1000000UL * (u32)mode->crtc_hdisplay / (u32)mode->clock;
+ line_time = min((u32) (1000000UL * (u32)mode->crtc_htotal / (u32)mode->clock), (u32)65535);
/* watermark for high clocks */
if (adev->pm.dpm_enabled) {
@@ -1319,7 +1319,7 @@ static void dce_v10_0_program_watermarks
wm_high.disp_clk = mode->clock;
wm_high.src_width = mode->crtc_hdisplay;
- wm_high.active_time = mode->crtc_hdisplay * pixel_period;
+ wm_high.active_time = active_time;
wm_high.blank_time = line_time - wm_high.active_time;
wm_high.interlaced = false;
if (mode->flags & DRM_MODE_FLAG_INTERLACE)
@@ -1358,7 +1358,7 @@ static void dce_v10_0_program_watermarks
wm_low.disp_clk = mode->clock;
wm_low.src_width = mode->crtc_hdisplay;
- wm_low.active_time = mode->crtc_hdisplay * pixel_period;
+ wm_low.active_time = active_time;
wm_low.blank_time = line_time - wm_low.active_time;
wm_low.interlaced = false;
if (mode->flags & DRM_MODE_FLAG_INTERLACE)
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/dce_v11_0.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/dce_v11_0.c
@@ -1264,14 +1264,14 @@ static void dce_v11_0_program_watermarks
{
struct drm_display_mode *mode = &amdgpu_crtc->base.mode;
struct dce10_wm_params wm_low, wm_high;
- u32 pixel_period;
+ u32 active_time;
u32 line_time = 0;
u32 latency_watermark_a = 0, latency_watermark_b = 0;
u32 tmp, wm_mask, lb_vblank_lead_lines = 0;
if (amdgpu_crtc->base.enabled && num_heads && mode) {
- pixel_period = 1000000 / (u32)mode->clock;
- line_time = min((u32)mode->crtc_htotal * pixel_period, (u32)65535);
+ active_time = 1000000UL * (u32)mode->crtc_hdisplay / (u32)mode->clock;
+ line_time = min((u32) (1000000UL * (u32)mode->crtc_htotal / (u32)mode->clock), (u32)65535);
/* watermark for high clocks */
if (adev->pm.dpm_enabled) {
@@ -1286,7 +1286,7 @@ static void dce_v11_0_program_watermarks
wm_high.disp_clk = mode->clock;
wm_high.src_width = mode->crtc_hdisplay;
- wm_high.active_time = mode->crtc_hdisplay * pixel_period;
+ wm_high.active_time = active_time;
wm_high.blank_time = line_time - wm_high.active_time;
wm_high.interlaced = false;
if (mode->flags & DRM_MODE_FLAG_INTERLACE)
@@ -1325,7 +1325,7 @@ static void dce_v11_0_program_watermarks
wm_low.disp_clk = mode->clock;
wm_low.src_width = mode->crtc_hdisplay;
- wm_low.active_time = mode->crtc_hdisplay * pixel_period;
+ wm_low.active_time = active_time;
wm_low.blank_time = line_time - wm_low.active_time;
wm_low.interlaced = false;
if (mode->flags & DRM_MODE_FLAG_INTERLACE)
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/dce_v6_0.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/dce_v6_0.c
@@ -1057,7 +1057,7 @@ static void dce_v6_0_program_watermarks(
struct drm_display_mode *mode = &amdgpu_crtc->base.mode;
struct dce6_wm_params wm_low, wm_high;
u32 dram_channels;
- u32 pixel_period;
+ u32 active_time;
u32 line_time = 0;
u32 latency_watermark_a = 0, latency_watermark_b = 0;
u32 priority_a_mark = 0, priority_b_mark = 0;
@@ -1067,8 +1067,8 @@ static void dce_v6_0_program_watermarks(
fixed20_12 a, b, c;
if (amdgpu_crtc->base.enabled && num_heads && mode) {
- pixel_period = 1000000 / (u32)mode->clock;
- line_time = min((u32)mode->crtc_htotal * pixel_period, (u32)65535);
+ active_time = 1000000UL * (u32)mode->crtc_hdisplay / (u32)mode->clock;
+ line_time = min((u32) (1000000UL * (u32)mode->crtc_htotal / (u32)mode->clock), (u32)65535);
priority_a_cnt = 0;
priority_b_cnt = 0;
@@ -1087,7 +1087,7 @@ static void dce_v6_0_program_watermarks(
wm_high.disp_clk = mode->clock;
wm_high.src_width = mode->crtc_hdisplay;
- wm_high.active_time = mode->crtc_hdisplay * pixel_period;
+ wm_high.active_time = active_time;
wm_high.blank_time = line_time - wm_high.active_time;
wm_high.interlaced = false;
if (mode->flags & DRM_MODE_FLAG_INTERLACE)
@@ -1114,7 +1114,7 @@ static void dce_v6_0_program_watermarks(
wm_low.disp_clk = mode->clock;
wm_low.src_width = mode->crtc_hdisplay;
- wm_low.active_time = mode->crtc_hdisplay * pixel_period;
+ wm_low.active_time = active_time;
wm_low.blank_time = line_time - wm_low.active_time;
wm_low.interlaced = false;
if (mode->flags & DRM_MODE_FLAG_INTERLACE)
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/dce_v8_0.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/dce_v8_0.c
@@ -1218,14 +1218,14 @@ static void dce_v8_0_program_watermarks(
{
struct drm_display_mode *mode = &amdgpu_crtc->base.mode;
struct dce8_wm_params wm_low, wm_high;
- u32 pixel_period;
+ u32 active_time;
u32 line_time = 0;
u32 latency_watermark_a = 0, latency_watermark_b = 0;
u32 tmp, wm_mask, lb_vblank_lead_lines = 0;
if (amdgpu_crtc->base.enabled && num_heads && mode) {
- pixel_period = 1000000 / (u32)mode->clock;
- line_time = min((u32)mode->crtc_htotal * pixel_period, (u32)65535);
+ active_time = 1000000UL * (u32)mode->crtc_hdisplay / (u32)mode->clock;
+ line_time = min((u32) (1000000UL * (u32)mode->crtc_htotal / (u32)mode->clock), (u32)65535);
/* watermark for high clocks */
if (adev->pm.dpm_enabled) {
@@ -1240,7 +1240,7 @@ static void dce_v8_0_program_watermarks(
wm_high.disp_clk = mode->clock;
wm_high.src_width = mode->crtc_hdisplay;
- wm_high.active_time = mode->crtc_hdisplay * pixel_period;
+ wm_high.active_time = active_time;
wm_high.blank_time = line_time - wm_high.active_time;
wm_high.interlaced = false;
if (mode->flags & DRM_MODE_FLAG_INTERLACE)
@@ -1279,7 +1279,7 @@ static void dce_v8_0_program_watermarks(
wm_low.disp_clk = mode->clock;
wm_low.src_width = mode->crtc_hdisplay;
- wm_low.active_time = mode->crtc_hdisplay * pixel_period;
+ wm_low.active_time = active_time;
wm_low.blank_time = line_time - wm_low.active_time;
wm_low.interlaced = false;
if (mode->flags & DRM_MODE_FLAG_INTERLACE)
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from mario.kleiner.de@gmail.com are
queue-4.9/drm-amdgpu-add-missing-lb_vblank_lead_lines-setup-to-dce-6-path.patch
queue-4.9/drm-amdgpu-avoid-overflows-divide-by-zero-in-latency_watermark-calculations.patch
queue-4.9/drm-amdgpu-make-display-watermark-calculations-more-accurate.patch
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2017-05-22 17:06 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-05-22 17:04 Patch "drm/amdgpu: Make display watermark calculations more accurate" has been added to the 4.9-stable tree gregkh
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).