stable.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "ufs: restore maintaining ->i_blocks" has been added to the 4.9-stable tree
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 11:19:55 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1497259195181114@kroah.com> (raw)


This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    ufs: restore maintaining ->i_blocks

to the 4.9-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     ufs-restore-maintaining-i_blocks.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.9 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.


>From eb315d2ae614493fd1ebb026c75a80573d84f7ad Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2017 21:15:03 -0400
Subject: ufs: restore maintaining ->i_blocks

From: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

commit eb315d2ae614493fd1ebb026c75a80573d84f7ad upstream.

Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 fs/stat.c       |    1 +
 fs/ufs/balloc.c |   26 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/fs/stat.c
+++ b/fs/stat.c
@@ -454,6 +454,7 @@ void __inode_add_bytes(struct inode *ino
 		inode->i_bytes -= 512;
 	}
 }
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(__inode_add_bytes);
 
 void inode_add_bytes(struct inode *inode, loff_t bytes)
 {
--- a/fs/ufs/balloc.c
+++ b/fs/ufs/balloc.c
@@ -81,7 +81,8 @@ void ufs_free_fragments(struct inode *in
 			ufs_error (sb, "ufs_free_fragments",
 				   "bit already cleared for fragment %u", i);
 	}
-	
+
+	inode_sub_bytes(inode, count << uspi->s_fshift);
 	fs32_add(sb, &ucg->cg_cs.cs_nffree, count);
 	uspi->cs_total.cs_nffree += count;
 	fs32_add(sb, &UFS_SB(sb)->fs_cs(cgno).cs_nffree, count);
@@ -183,6 +184,7 @@ do_more:
 			ufs_error(sb, "ufs_free_blocks", "freeing free fragment");
 		}
 		ubh_setblock(UCPI_UBH(ucpi), ucpi->c_freeoff, blkno);
+		inode_sub_bytes(inode, uspi->s_fpb << uspi->s_fshift);
 		if ((UFS_SB(sb)->s_flags & UFS_CG_MASK) == UFS_CG_44BSD)
 			ufs_clusteracct (sb, ucpi, blkno, 1);
 
@@ -494,6 +496,20 @@ u64 ufs_new_fragments(struct inode *inod
 	return 0;
 }		
 
+static bool try_add_frags(struct inode *inode, unsigned frags)
+{
+	unsigned size = frags * i_blocksize(inode);
+	spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
+	__inode_add_bytes(inode, size);
+	if (unlikely((u32)inode->i_blocks != inode->i_blocks)) {
+		__inode_sub_bytes(inode, size);
+		spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
+		return false;
+	}
+	spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
+	return true;
+}
+
 static u64 ufs_add_fragments(struct inode *inode, u64 fragment,
 			     unsigned oldcount, unsigned newcount)
 {
@@ -530,6 +546,9 @@ static u64 ufs_add_fragments(struct inod
 	for (i = oldcount; i < newcount; i++)
 		if (ubh_isclr (UCPI_UBH(ucpi), ucpi->c_freeoff, fragno + i))
 			return 0;
+
+	if (!try_add_frags(inode, count))
+		return 0;
 	/*
 	 * Block can be extended
 	 */
@@ -647,6 +666,7 @@ cg_found:
 			ubh_setbit (UCPI_UBH(ucpi), ucpi->c_freeoff, goal + i);
 		i = uspi->s_fpb - count;
 
+		inode_sub_bytes(inode, i << uspi->s_fshift);
 		fs32_add(sb, &ucg->cg_cs.cs_nffree, i);
 		uspi->cs_total.cs_nffree += i;
 		fs32_add(sb, &UFS_SB(sb)->fs_cs(cgno).cs_nffree, i);
@@ -657,6 +677,8 @@ cg_found:
 	result = ufs_bitmap_search (sb, ucpi, goal, allocsize);
 	if (result == INVBLOCK)
 		return 0;
+	if (!try_add_frags(inode, count))
+		return 0;
 	for (i = 0; i < count; i++)
 		ubh_clrbit (UCPI_UBH(ucpi), ucpi->c_freeoff, result + i);
 	
@@ -716,6 +738,8 @@ norot:
 		return INVBLOCK;
 	ucpi->c_rotor = result;
 gotit:
+	if (!try_add_frags(inode, uspi->s_fpb))
+		return 0;
 	blkno = ufs_fragstoblks(result);
 	ubh_clrblock (UCPI_UBH(ucpi), ucpi->c_freeoff, blkno);
 	if ((UFS_SB(sb)->s_flags & UFS_CG_MASK) == UFS_CG_44BSD)


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk are

queue-4.9/ufs-set-correct-s_maxsize.patch
queue-4.9/ufs_getfrag_block-we-only-grab-truncate_mutex-on-block-creation-path.patch
queue-4.9/ufs-restore-proper-tail-allocation.patch
queue-4.9/ufs_extend_tail-fix-the-braino-in-calling-conventions-of-ufs_new_fragments.patch
queue-4.9/ufs-restore-maintaining-i_blocks.patch
queue-4.9/fix-ufs_isblockset.patch

                 reply	other threads:[~2017-06-12  9:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1497259195181114@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).