From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: michael.chan@broadcom.com, alexander.levin@verizon.com,
davem@davemloft.net, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "bnxt_en: Fix bnxt_reset() in the slow path task." has been added to the 4.9-stable tree
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2017 16:26:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1497536810127131@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
bnxt_en: Fix bnxt_reset() in the slow path task.
to the 4.9-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
bnxt_en-fix-bnxt_reset-in-the-slow-path-task.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.9 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From foo@baz Thu Jun 15 16:23:30 CEST 2017
From: Michael Chan <michael.chan@broadcom.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2017 02:55:07 -0500
Subject: bnxt_en: Fix bnxt_reset() in the slow path task.
From: Michael Chan <michael.chan@broadcom.com>
[ Upstream commit a551ee94ea723b4af9b827c7460f108bc13425ee ]
In bnxt_sp_task(), we set a bit BNXT_STATE_IN_SP_TASK so that bnxt_close()
will synchronize and wait for bnxt_sp_task() to finish. Some functions
in bnxt_sp_task() require us to clear BNXT_STATE_IN_SP_TASK and then
acquire rtnl_lock() to prevent race conditions.
There are some bugs related to this logic. This patch refactors the code
to have common bnxt_rtnl_lock_sp() and bnxt_rtnl_unlock_sp() to handle
the RTNL and the clearing/setting of the bit. Multiple functions will
need the same logic. We also need to move bnxt_reset() to the end of
bnxt_sp_task(). Functions that clear BNXT_STATE_IN_SP_TASK must be the
last functions to be called in bnxt_sp_task(). The common scheme will
handle the condition properly.
Signed-off-by: Michael Chan <michael.chan@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@verizon.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c
@@ -6080,23 +6080,32 @@ bnxt_restart_timer:
mod_timer(&bp->timer, jiffies + bp->current_interval);
}
-/* Only called from bnxt_sp_task() */
-static void bnxt_reset(struct bnxt *bp, bool silent)
+static void bnxt_rtnl_lock_sp(struct bnxt *bp)
{
- /* bnxt_reset_task() calls bnxt_close_nic() which waits
- * for BNXT_STATE_IN_SP_TASK to clear.
- * If there is a parallel dev_close(), bnxt_close() may be holding
+ /* We are called from bnxt_sp_task which has BNXT_STATE_IN_SP_TASK
+ * set. If the device is being closed, bnxt_close() may be holding
* rtnl() and waiting for BNXT_STATE_IN_SP_TASK to clear. So we
* must clear BNXT_STATE_IN_SP_TASK before holding rtnl().
*/
clear_bit(BNXT_STATE_IN_SP_TASK, &bp->state);
rtnl_lock();
- if (test_bit(BNXT_STATE_OPEN, &bp->state))
- bnxt_reset_task(bp, silent);
+}
+
+static void bnxt_rtnl_unlock_sp(struct bnxt *bp)
+{
set_bit(BNXT_STATE_IN_SP_TASK, &bp->state);
rtnl_unlock();
}
+/* Only called from bnxt_sp_task() */
+static void bnxt_reset(struct bnxt *bp, bool silent)
+{
+ bnxt_rtnl_lock_sp(bp);
+ if (test_bit(BNXT_STATE_OPEN, &bp->state))
+ bnxt_reset_task(bp, silent);
+ bnxt_rtnl_unlock_sp(bp);
+}
+
static void bnxt_cfg_ntp_filters(struct bnxt *);
static void bnxt_sp_task(struct work_struct *work)
@@ -6142,18 +6151,21 @@ static void bnxt_sp_task(struct work_str
bnxt_hwrm_tunnel_dst_port_free(
bp, TUNNEL_DST_PORT_FREE_REQ_TUNNEL_TYPE_GENEVE);
}
- if (test_and_clear_bit(BNXT_RESET_TASK_SP_EVENT, &bp->sp_event))
- bnxt_reset(bp, false);
-
- if (test_and_clear_bit(BNXT_RESET_TASK_SILENT_SP_EVENT, &bp->sp_event))
- bnxt_reset(bp, true);
-
if (test_and_clear_bit(BNXT_HWRM_PORT_MODULE_SP_EVENT, &bp->sp_event))
bnxt_get_port_module_status(bp);
if (test_and_clear_bit(BNXT_PERIODIC_STATS_SP_EVENT, &bp->sp_event))
bnxt_hwrm_port_qstats(bp);
+ /* These functions below will clear BNXT_STATE_IN_SP_TASK. They
+ * must be the last functions to be called before exiting.
+ */
+ if (test_and_clear_bit(BNXT_RESET_TASK_SP_EVENT, &bp->sp_event))
+ bnxt_reset(bp, false);
+
+ if (test_and_clear_bit(BNXT_RESET_TASK_SILENT_SP_EVENT, &bp->sp_event))
+ bnxt_reset(bp, true);
+
smp_mb__before_atomic();
clear_bit(BNXT_STATE_IN_SP_TASK, &bp->state);
}
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from michael.chan@broadcom.com are
queue-4.9/bnxt_en-fix-bnxt_reset-in-the-slow-path-task.patch
queue-4.9/bnxt_en-enhance-autoneg-support.patch
queue-4.9/bnxt_en-fix-rtnl-lock-usage-on-bnxt_update_link.patch
queue-4.9/bnxt_en-fix-rtnl-lock-usage-on-bnxt_get_port_module_status.patch
reply other threads:[~2017-06-15 14:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1497536810127131@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=alexander.levin@verizon.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=michael.chan@broadcom.com \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox