From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: paul.burton@imgtec.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, ralf@linux-mips.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "MIPS: Fix bnezc/jialc return address calculation" has been added to the 4.9-stable tree
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2017 09:16:56 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <14978350161668@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
MIPS: Fix bnezc/jialc return address calculation
to the 4.9-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
mips-fix-bnezc-jialc-return-address-calculation.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.9 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From 1a73d9310e093fc3adffba4d0a67b9fab2ee3f63 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Burton <paul.burton@imgtec.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2017 11:35:01 -0700
Subject: MIPS: Fix bnezc/jialc return address calculation
From: Paul Burton <paul.burton@imgtec.com>
commit 1a73d9310e093fc3adffba4d0a67b9fab2ee3f63 upstream.
The code handling the pop76 opcode (ie. bnezc & jialc instructions) in
__compute_return_epc_for_insn() needs to set the value of $31 in the
jialc case, which is encoded with rs = 0. However its check to
differentiate bnezc (rs != 0) from jialc (rs = 0) was unfortunately
backwards, meaning that if we emulate a bnezc instruction we clobber $31
& if we emulate a jialc instruction it actually behaves like a jic
instruction.
Fix this by inverting the check of rs to match the way the instructions
are actually encoded.
Signed-off-by: Paul Burton <paul.burton@imgtec.com>
Fixes: 28d6f93d201d ("MIPS: Emulate the new MIPS R6 BNEZC and JIALC instructions")
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/16178/
Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
arch/mips/kernel/branch.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/arch/mips/kernel/branch.c
+++ b/arch/mips/kernel/branch.c
@@ -804,8 +804,10 @@ int __compute_return_epc_for_insn(struct
break;
}
/* Compact branch: BNEZC || JIALC */
- if (insn.i_format.rs)
+ if (!insn.i_format.rs) {
+ /* JIALC: set $31/ra */
regs->regs[31] = epc + 4;
+ }
regs->cp0_epc += 8;
break;
#endif
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from paul.burton@imgtec.com are
queue-4.9/mips-.its-targets-depend-on-vmlinux.patch
queue-4.9/mips-fix-bnezc-jialc-return-address-calculation.patch
reply other threads:[~2017-06-19 1:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=14978350161668@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=paul.burton@imgtec.com \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).