From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: d-gerlach@ti.com, fcooper@ti.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
tony@atomide.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "ARM: OMAP2+: omap_device: Sync omap_device and pm_runtime after probe defer" has been added to the 4.9-stable tree
Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2017 14:30:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1499085007265@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
ARM: OMAP2+: omap_device: Sync omap_device and pm_runtime after probe defer
to the 4.9-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
arm-omap2-omap_device-sync-omap_device-and-pm_runtime-after-probe-defer.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.9 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From 04abaf07f6d5cdf22b7a478a86e706dfeeeef960 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@ti.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 14:58:18 -0500
Subject: ARM: OMAP2+: omap_device: Sync omap_device and pm_runtime after probe defer
From: Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@ti.com>
commit 04abaf07f6d5cdf22b7a478a86e706dfeeeef960 upstream.
Starting from commit 5de85b9d57ab ("PM / runtime: Re-init runtime PM
states at probe error and driver unbind") pm_runtime core now changes
device runtime_status back to after RPM_SUSPENDED after a probe defer.
Certain OMAP devices make use of "ti,no-idle-on-init" flag which causes
omap_device_enable to be called during the BUS_NOTIFY_ADD_DEVICE event
during probe, along with pm_runtime_set_active.
This call to pm_runtime_set_active typically will prevent a call to
pm_runtime_get in a driver probe function from re-enabling the
omap_device. However, in the case of a probe defer that happens before
the driver probe function is able to run, such as a missing pinctrl
states defer, pm_runtime_reinit will set the device as RPM_SUSPENDED and
then once driver probe is actually able to run, pm_runtime_get will see
the device as suspended and call through to the omap_device layer,
attempting to enable the already enabled omap_device and causing errors
like this:
omap-gpmc 50000000.gpmc: omap_device: omap_device_enable() called from
invalid state 1
omap-gpmc 50000000.gpmc: use pm_runtime_put_sync_suspend() in driver?
We can avoid this error by making sure the pm_runtime status of a device
matches the omap_device state before a probe attempt. By extending the
omap_device bus notifier to act on the BUS_NOTIFY_BIND_DRIVER event we
can check if a device is enabled in omap_device but with a pm_runtime
status of RPM_SUSPENDED and once again mark the device as RPM_ACTIVE to
avoid a second incorrect call to omap_device_enable.
Fixes: 5de85b9d57ab ("PM / runtime: Re-init runtime PM states at probe
error and driver unbind")
Tested-by: Franklin S Cooper Jr. <fcooper@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_device.c | 8 ++++++++
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_device.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_device.c
@@ -222,6 +222,14 @@ static int _omap_device_notifier_call(st
dev_err(dev, "failed to idle\n");
}
break;
+ case BUS_NOTIFY_BIND_DRIVER:
+ od = to_omap_device(pdev);
+ if (od && (od->_state == OMAP_DEVICE_STATE_ENABLED) &&
+ pm_runtime_status_suspended(dev)) {
+ od->_driver_status = BUS_NOTIFY_BIND_DRIVER;
+ pm_runtime_set_active(dev);
+ }
+ break;
case BUS_NOTIFY_ADD_DEVICE:
if (pdev->dev.of_node)
omap_device_build_from_dt(pdev);
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from d-gerlach@ti.com are
queue-4.9/arm-omap2-omap_device-sync-omap_device-and-pm_runtime-after-probe-defer.patch
reply other threads:[~2017-07-03 12:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1499085007265@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=d-gerlach@ti.com \
--cc=fcooper@ti.com \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox