From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: matt@codeblueprint.co.uk, efault@gmx.de, fweisbec@gmail.com,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, mingo@kernel.org,
morten.rasmussen@arm.com, peterz@infradead.org,
tglx@linutronix.de, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "sched/loadavg: Avoid loadavg spikes caused by delayed NO_HZ accounting" has been added to the 4.9-stable tree
Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2017 14:30:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <149908501174159@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
sched/loadavg: Avoid loadavg spikes caused by delayed NO_HZ accounting
to the 4.9-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
sched-loadavg-avoid-loadavg-spikes-caused-by-delayed-no_hz-accounting.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.9 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From 6e5f32f7a43f45ee55c401c0b9585eb01f9629a8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2017 12:07:30 +0000
Subject: sched/loadavg: Avoid loadavg spikes caused by delayed NO_HZ accounting
From: Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>
commit 6e5f32f7a43f45ee55c401c0b9585eb01f9629a8 upstream.
If we crossed a sample window while in NO_HZ we will add LOAD_FREQ to
the pending sample window time on exit, setting the next update not
one window into the future, but two.
This situation on exiting NO_HZ is described by:
this_rq->calc_load_update < jiffies < calc_load_update
In this scenario, what we should be doing is:
this_rq->calc_load_update = calc_load_update [ next window ]
But what we actually do is:
this_rq->calc_load_update = calc_load_update + LOAD_FREQ [ next+1 window ]
This has the effect of delaying load average updates for potentially
up to ~9seconds.
This can result in huge spikes in the load average values due to
per-cpu uninterruptible task counts being out of sync when accumulated
across all CPUs.
It's safe to update the per-cpu active count if we wake between sample
windows because any load that we left in 'calc_load_idle' will have
been zero'd when the idle load was folded in calc_global_load().
This issue is easy to reproduce before,
commit 9d89c257dfb9 ("sched/fair: Rewrite runnable load and utilization average tracking")
just by forking short-lived process pipelines built from ps(1) and
grep(1) in a loop. I'm unable to reproduce the spikes after that
commit, but the bug still seems to be present from code review.
Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>
Cc: Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Fixes: commit 5167e8d ("sched/nohz: Rewrite and fix load-avg computation -- again")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170217120731.11868-2-matt@codeblueprint.co.uk
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
kernel/sched/loadavg.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/sched/loadavg.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/loadavg.c
@@ -201,8 +201,9 @@ void calc_load_exit_idle(void)
struct rq *this_rq = this_rq();
/*
- * If we're still before the sample window, we're done.
+ * If we're still before the pending sample window, we're done.
*/
+ this_rq->calc_load_update = calc_load_update;
if (time_before(jiffies, this_rq->calc_load_update))
return;
@@ -211,7 +212,6 @@ void calc_load_exit_idle(void)
* accounted through the nohz accounting, so skip the entire deal and
* sync up for the next window.
*/
- this_rq->calc_load_update = calc_load_update;
if (time_before(jiffies, this_rq->calc_load_update + 10))
this_rq->calc_load_update += LOAD_FREQ;
}
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from matt@codeblueprint.co.uk are
queue-4.9/sched-loadavg-avoid-loadavg-spikes-caused-by-delayed-no_hz-accounting.patch
reply other threads:[~2017-07-03 12:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=149908501174159@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=matt@codeblueprint.co.uk \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox