From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <stable-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:45720 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1750995AbdGXTq1 (ORCPT <rfc822;stable@vger.kernel.org>);
        Mon, 24 Jul 2017 15:46:27 -0400
Message-ID: <1500925583.6243.4.camel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] HID: rmi: Make sure the HID device is opened on resume
From: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
To: Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>,
        linux-input <linux-input@vger.kernel.org>,
        Andrew Duggan <aduggan@synaptics.com>, stable@vger.kernel.org,
        Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2017 15:46:23 -0400
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LSU.2.20.1707242127300.4705@cbobk.fhfr.pm>
References: <20170723011509.23651-1-lyude@redhat.com>
          <CAHp75VcZxAEr+ARw0U1nxtXR1fgWrQ1w=dhpZbm+DRiDbwajYA@mail.gmail.com>
         <1500918313.6243.1.camel@redhat.com>
         <alpine.LSU.2.20.1707242127300.4705@cbobk.fhfr.pm>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <stable.vger.kernel.org>

Yeah I noticed that, sorry if my response wasn't very clear! Should
probably wait to have my morning coffee before responding to these
messages :P

On Mon, 2017-07-24 at 21:28 +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Jul 2017, Lyude Paul wrote:
> 
> > > > So, call hid_hw_open() in rmi_post_resume() so we make sure
> > > > that
> > > > the
> > > > device is alive before we try talking to it.
> > > > 
> > > > This fixes RMI device suspend/resume over HID.
> > > > -       int ret;
> > > > +       int ret = 0;
> > > 
> > > What's the point?
> > 
> > So that we can use the same out: label at the end of the function
> > that
> > calls hid_hw_close() to return success. This being said though I
> > just
> > realized that setting ret will initialize it to 0 anyway, so I
> > guess
> > this can be dropped
> 
> Andy's point was that hid_hw_open() is obviously re-initializing the
> ret 
> before its first use as a return value, so there is no need to
> initialize 
> it at a declaration time.
>