From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: macro@imgtec.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
james.hogan@imgtec.com, ralf@linux-mips.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "MIPS: Rename `sigill_r6' to `sigill_r2r6' in `__compute_return_epc_for_insn'" has been added to the 4.12-stable tree
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2017 21:39:42 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <15009575825394@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
MIPS: Rename `sigill_r6' to `sigill_r2r6' in `__compute_return_epc_for_insn'
to the 4.12-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
mips-rename-sigill_r6-to-sigill_r2r6-in-__compute_return_epc_for_insn.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.12 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From 1f4edde422961397cf4470b347958c13c6a740bb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@imgtec.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2017 00:09:23 +0100
Subject: MIPS: Rename `sigill_r6' to `sigill_r2r6' in `__compute_return_epc_for_insn'
From: Maciej W. Rozycki <macro@imgtec.com>
commit 1f4edde422961397cf4470b347958c13c6a740bb upstream.
Use the more accurate `sigill_r2r6' name for the label used in the case
of sending SIGILL in the absence of the instruction emulator for an
earlier ISA level instruction that has been removed as from the R6 ISA,
so that the `sigill_r6' name is freed for the situation where an R6
instruction is not supposed to be interpreted, because the executing
processor does not support the R6 ISA.
Signed-off-by: Maciej W. Rozycki <macro@imgtec.com>
Cc: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/16397/
Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
arch/mips/kernel/branch.c | 16 ++++++++--------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/mips/kernel/branch.c
+++ b/arch/mips/kernel/branch.c
@@ -431,7 +431,7 @@ int __compute_return_epc_for_insn(struct
/* Fall through */
case jr_op:
if (NO_R6EMU && insn.r_format.func == jr_op)
- goto sigill_r6;
+ goto sigill_r2r6;
regs->cp0_epc = regs->regs[insn.r_format.rs];
break;
}
@@ -446,7 +446,7 @@ int __compute_return_epc_for_insn(struct
switch (insn.i_format.rt) {
case bltzl_op:
if (NO_R6EMU)
- goto sigill_r6;
+ goto sigill_r2r6;
case bltz_op:
if ((long)regs->regs[insn.i_format.rs] < 0) {
epc = epc + 4 + (insn.i_format.simmediate << 2);
@@ -459,7 +459,7 @@ int __compute_return_epc_for_insn(struct
case bgezl_op:
if (NO_R6EMU)
- goto sigill_r6;
+ goto sigill_r2r6;
case bgez_op:
if ((long)regs->regs[insn.i_format.rs] >= 0) {
epc = epc + 4 + (insn.i_format.simmediate << 2);
@@ -574,7 +574,7 @@ int __compute_return_epc_for_insn(struct
*/
case beql_op:
if (NO_R6EMU)
- goto sigill_r6;
+ goto sigill_r2r6;
case beq_op:
if (regs->regs[insn.i_format.rs] ==
regs->regs[insn.i_format.rt]) {
@@ -588,7 +588,7 @@ int __compute_return_epc_for_insn(struct
case bnel_op:
if (NO_R6EMU)
- goto sigill_r6;
+ goto sigill_r2r6;
case bne_op:
if (regs->regs[insn.i_format.rs] !=
regs->regs[insn.i_format.rt]) {
@@ -602,7 +602,7 @@ int __compute_return_epc_for_insn(struct
case blezl_op: /* not really i_format */
if (!insn.i_format.rt && NO_R6EMU)
- goto sigill_r6;
+ goto sigill_r2r6;
case blez_op:
/*
* Compact branches for R6 for the
@@ -637,7 +637,7 @@ int __compute_return_epc_for_insn(struct
case bgtzl_op:
if (!insn.i_format.rt && NO_R6EMU)
- goto sigill_r6;
+ goto sigill_r2r6;
case bgtz_op:
/*
* Compact branches for R6 for the
@@ -836,7 +836,7 @@ sigill_dsp:
current->comm);
force_sig(SIGILL, current);
return -EFAULT;
-sigill_r6:
+sigill_r2r6:
pr_info("%s: R2 branch but r2-to-r6 emulator is not preset - sending SIGILL.\n",
current->comm);
force_sig(SIGILL, current);
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from macro@imgtec.com are
queue-4.12/mips-send-sigill-for-bposge32-in-__compute_return_epc_for_insn.patch
queue-4.12/mips-actually-decode-jalx-in-__compute_return_epc_for_insn.patch
queue-4.12/mips-fix-a-typo-s-preset-present-in-r2-to-r6-emulation-error-message.patch
queue-4.12/mips-fix-unaligned-pc-interpretation-in-compute_return_epc.patch
queue-4.12/mips-rename-sigill_r6-to-sigill_r2r6-in-__compute_return_epc_for_insn.patch
queue-4.12/mips-send-sigill-for-r6-branches-in-__compute_return_epc_for_insn.patch
queue-4.12/mips-send-sigill-for-linked-branches-in-__compute_return_epc_for_insn.patch
queue-4.12/mips-math-emu-prevent-wrong-isa-mode-instruction-emulation.patch
reply other threads:[~2017-07-25 4:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=15009575825394@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=james.hogan@imgtec.com \
--cc=macro@imgtec.com \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).