From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: bfoster@redhat.com, darrick.wong@oracle.com, david@fromorbit.com,
dchinner@redhat.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
nborisov@suse.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "xfs: don't BUG() on mixed direct and mapped I/O" has been added to the 4.4-stable tree
Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2017 14:56:45 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1501797405106126@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
xfs: don't BUG() on mixed direct and mapped I/O
to the 4.4-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
xfs-don-t-bug-on-mixed-direct-and-mapped-i-o.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.4 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From 04197b341f23b908193308b8d63d17ff23232598 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2016 12:54:14 +1100
Subject: xfs: don't BUG() on mixed direct and mapped I/O
From: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
commit 04197b341f23b908193308b8d63d17ff23232598 upstream.
We've had reports of generic/095 causing XFS to BUG() in
__xfs_get_blocks() due to the existence of delalloc blocks on a
direct I/O read. generic/095 issues a mix of various types of I/O,
including direct and memory mapped I/O to a single file. This is
clearly not supported behavior and is known to lead to such
problems. E.g., the lack of exclusion between the direct I/O and
write fault paths means that a write fault can allocate delalloc
blocks in a region of a file that was previously a hole after the
direct read has attempted to flush/inval the file range, but before
it actually reads the block mapping. In turn, the direct read
discovers a delalloc extent and cannot proceed.
While the appropriate solution here is to not mix direct and memory
mapped I/O to the same regions of the same file, the current
BUG_ON() behavior is probably overkill as it can crash the entire
system. Instead, localize the failure to the I/O in question by
returning an error for a direct I/O that cannot be handled safely
due to delalloc blocks. Be careful to allow the case of a direct
write to post-eof delalloc blocks. This can occur due to speculative
preallocation and is safe as post-eof blocks are not accompanied by
dirty pages in pagecache (conversely, preallocation within eof must
have been zeroed, and thus dirtied, before the inode size could have
been increased beyond said blocks).
Finally, provide an additional warning if a direct I/O write occurs
while the file is memory mapped. This may not catch all problematic
scenarios, but provides a hint that some known-to-be-problematic I/O
methods are in use.
Signed-off-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Acked-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c
@@ -1426,6 +1426,26 @@ __xfs_get_blocks(
if (error)
goto out_unlock;
+ /*
+ * The only time we can ever safely find delalloc blocks on direct I/O
+ * is a dio write to post-eof speculative preallocation. All other
+ * scenarios are indicative of a problem or misuse (such as mixing
+ * direct and mapped I/O).
+ *
+ * The file may be unmapped by the time we get here so we cannot
+ * reliably fail the I/O based on mapping. Instead, fail the I/O if this
+ * is a read or a write within eof. Otherwise, carry on but warn as a
+ * precuation if the file happens to be mapped.
+ */
+ if (direct && imap.br_startblock == DELAYSTARTBLOCK) {
+ if (!create || offset < i_size_read(VFS_I(ip))) {
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
+ error = -EIO;
+ goto out_unlock;
+ }
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(mapping_mapped(VFS_I(ip)->i_mapping));
+ }
+
/* for DAX, we convert unwritten extents directly */
if (create &&
(!nimaps ||
@@ -1525,7 +1545,6 @@ __xfs_get_blocks(
set_buffer_new(bh_result);
if (imap.br_startblock == DELAYSTARTBLOCK) {
- BUG_ON(direct);
if (create) {
set_buffer_uptodate(bh_result);
set_buffer_mapped(bh_result);
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from bfoster@redhat.com are
queue-4.4/xfs-don-t-bug-on-mixed-direct-and-mapped-i-o.patch
reply other threads:[~2017-08-03 21:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1501797405106126@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
--cc=nborisov@suse.com \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).