stable.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: ncardwell@google.com, davem@davemloft.net,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, soheil@google.com, ycheng@google.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "tcp_bbr: introduce bbr_init_pacing_rate_from_rtt() helper" has been added to the 4.12-stable tree
Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2017 16:29:30 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <150223497011573@kroah.com> (raw)


This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    tcp_bbr: introduce bbr_init_pacing_rate_from_rtt() helper

to the 4.12-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     tcp_bbr-introduce-bbr_init_pacing_rate_from_rtt-helper.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.12 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.


>From foo@baz Tue Aug  8 16:27:29 PDT 2017
From: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2017 17:49:23 -0400
Subject: tcp_bbr: introduce bbr_init_pacing_rate_from_rtt() helper

From: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>


[ Upstream commit 79135b89b8af304456bd67916b80116ddf03d7b6 ]

Introduce a helper to initialize the BBR pacing rate unconditionally,
based on the current cwnd and RTT estimate. This is a pure refactor,
but is needed for two following fixes.

Fixes: 0f8782ea1497 ("tcp_bbr: add BBR congestion control")
Signed-off-by: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@google.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 net/ipv4/tcp_bbr.c |   23 ++++++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_bbr.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_bbr.c
@@ -222,6 +222,23 @@ static u32 bbr_bw_to_pacing_rate(struct
 	return rate;
 }
 
+/* Initialize pacing rate to: high_gain * init_cwnd / RTT. */
+static void bbr_init_pacing_rate_from_rtt(struct sock *sk)
+{
+	struct tcp_sock *tp = tcp_sk(sk);
+	u64 bw;
+	u32 rtt_us;
+
+	if (tp->srtt_us) {		/* any RTT sample yet? */
+		rtt_us = max(tp->srtt_us >> 3, 1U);
+	} else {			 /* no RTT sample yet */
+		rtt_us = USEC_PER_MSEC;	 /* use nominal default RTT */
+	}
+	bw = (u64)tp->snd_cwnd * BW_UNIT;
+	do_div(bw, rtt_us);
+	sk->sk_pacing_rate = bbr_bw_to_pacing_rate(sk, bw, bbr_high_gain);
+}
+
 /* Pace using current bw estimate and a gain factor. In order to help drive the
  * network toward lower queues while maintaining high utilization and low
  * latency, the average pacing rate aims to be slightly (~1%) lower than the
@@ -806,7 +823,6 @@ static void bbr_init(struct sock *sk)
 {
 	struct tcp_sock *tp = tcp_sk(sk);
 	struct bbr *bbr = inet_csk_ca(sk);
-	u64 bw;
 
 	bbr->prior_cwnd = 0;
 	bbr->tso_segs_goal = 0;	 /* default segs per skb until first ACK */
@@ -822,11 +838,8 @@ static void bbr_init(struct sock *sk)
 
 	minmax_reset(&bbr->bw, bbr->rtt_cnt, 0);  /* init max bw to 0 */
 
-	/* Initialize pacing rate to: high_gain * init_cwnd / RTT. */
-	bw = (u64)tp->snd_cwnd * BW_UNIT;
-	do_div(bw, (tp->srtt_us >> 3) ? : USEC_PER_MSEC);
 	sk->sk_pacing_rate = 0;		/* force an update of sk_pacing_rate */
-	bbr_set_pacing_rate(sk, bw, bbr_high_gain);
+	bbr_init_pacing_rate_from_rtt(sk);
 
 	bbr->restore_cwnd = 0;
 	bbr->round_start = 0;


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from ncardwell@google.com are

queue-4.12/tcp_bbr-remove-sk_pacing_rate-0-transient-during-init.patch
queue-4.12/tcp_bbr-introduce-bbr_bw_to_pacing_rate-helper.patch
queue-4.12/tcp_bbr-introduce-bbr_init_pacing_rate_from_rtt-helper.patch
queue-4.12/tcp_bbr-init-pacing-rate-on-first-rtt-sample.patch
queue-4.12/tcp_bbr-cut-pacing-rate-only-if-filled-pipe.patch

                 reply	other threads:[~2017-08-08 23:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=150223497011573@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=ncardwell@google.com \
    --cc=soheil@google.com \
    --cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ycheng@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).