stable.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: rwareing@fb.com, david@fromorbit.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
	torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "xfs: XFS_IS_REALTIME_INODE() should be false if no rt device present" has been added to the 4.9-stable tree
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2017 20:42:06 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1505274126213241@kroah.com> (raw)


This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    xfs: XFS_IS_REALTIME_INODE() should be false if no rt device present

to the 4.9-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     xfs-xfs_is_realtime_inode-should-be-false-if-no-rt-device-present.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.9 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.


>From b31ff3cdf540110da4572e3e29bd172087af65cc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Richard Wareing <rwareing@fb.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 09:09:35 +1000
Subject: xfs: XFS_IS_REALTIME_INODE() should be false if no rt device present

From: Richard Wareing <rwareing@fb.com>

commit b31ff3cdf540110da4572e3e29bd172087af65cc upstream.

If using a kernel with CONFIG_XFS_RT=y and we set the RHINHERIT flag on
a directory in a filesystem that does not have a realtime device and
create a new file in that directory, it gets marked as a real time file.
When data is written and a fsync is issued, the filesystem attempts to
flush a non-existent rt device during the fsync process.

This results in a crash dereferencing a null buftarg pointer in
xfs_blkdev_issue_flush():

  BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000008
  IP: xfs_blkdev_issue_flush+0xd/0x20
  .....
  Call Trace:
    xfs_file_fsync+0x188/0x1c0
    vfs_fsync_range+0x3b/0xa0
    do_fsync+0x3d/0x70
    SyS_fsync+0x10/0x20
    do_syscall_64+0x4d/0xb0
    entry_SYSCALL64_slow_path+0x25/0x25

Setting RT inode flags does not require special privileges so any
unprivileged user can cause this oops to occur.  To reproduce, confirm
kernel is compiled with CONFIG_XFS_RT=y and run:

  # mkfs.xfs -f /dev/pmem0
  # mount /dev/pmem0 /mnt/test
  # mkdir /mnt/test/foo
  # xfs_io -c 'chattr +t' /mnt/test/foo
  # xfs_io -f -c 'pwrite 0 5m' -c fsync /mnt/test/foo/bar

Or just run xfstests with MKFS_OPTIONS="-d rtinherit=1" and wait.

Kernels built with CONFIG_XFS_RT=n are not exposed to this bug.

Fixes: f538d4da8d52 ("[XFS] write barrier support")
Signed-off-by: Richard Wareing <rwareing@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 fs/xfs/xfs_linux.h |    9 ++++++++-
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_linux.h
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_linux.h
@@ -363,7 +363,14 @@ static inline __uint64_t howmany_64(__ui
 #endif /* DEBUG */
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_XFS_RT
-#define XFS_IS_REALTIME_INODE(ip) ((ip)->i_d.di_flags & XFS_DIFLAG_REALTIME)
+
+/*
+ * make sure we ignore the inode flag if the filesystem doesn't have a
+ * configured realtime device.
+ */
+#define XFS_IS_REALTIME_INODE(ip)			\
+	(((ip)->i_d.di_flags & XFS_DIFLAG_REALTIME) &&	\
+	 (ip)->i_mount->m_rtdev_targp)
 #else
 #define XFS_IS_REALTIME_INODE(ip) (0)
 #endif


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from rwareing@fb.com are

queue-4.9/xfs-xfs_is_realtime_inode-should-be-false-if-no-rt-device-present.patch

                 reply	other threads:[~2017-09-13  3:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1505274126213241@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=rwareing@fb.com \
    --cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).