Patch "spi: pxa2xx: Add support for Intel Gemini Lake" has been added to the 4.9-stable tree

Patch "spi: pxa2xx: Add support for Intel Gemini Lake" has been added to the 4.9-stable tree

[gregkh]

This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    spi: pxa2xx: Add support for Intel Gemini Lake

to the 4.9-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     spi-pxa2xx-add-support-for-intel-gemini-lake.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.9 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.


>From foo@baz Thu Oct  5 10:28:31 CEST 2017
From: "David E. Box" <david.e.box@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2017 16:25:21 +0200
Subject: spi: pxa2xx: Add support for Intel Gemini Lake

From: "David E. Box" <david.e.box@linux.intel.com>


[ Upstream commit e18a80acd1365e91e3efcd69942d9073936cf851 ]

Gemini Lake reuses the same LPSS SPI configuration as Broxton

Signed-off-by: David E. Box <david.e.box@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@verizon.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 drivers/spi/spi-pxa2xx.c |    4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

--- a/drivers/spi/spi-pxa2xx.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-pxa2xx.c
@@ -1458,6 +1458,10 @@ static const struct pci_device_id pxa2xx
 	{ PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x1ac2), LPSS_BXT_SSP },
 	{ PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x1ac4), LPSS_BXT_SSP },
 	{ PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x1ac6), LPSS_BXT_SSP },
+	/* GLK */
+	{ PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x31c2), LPSS_BXT_SSP },
+	{ PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x31c4), LPSS_BXT_SSP },
+	{ PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x31c6), LPSS_BXT_SSP },
 	/* APL */
 	{ PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x5ac2), LPSS_BXT_SSP },
 	{ PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x5ac4), LPSS_BXT_SSP },


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from david.e.box@linux.intel.com are

queue-4.9/spi-pxa2xx-add-support-for-intel-gemini-lake.patch

Re: Patch "spi: pxa2xx: Add support for Intel Gemini Lake" has been added to the 4.9-stable tree

[Mark Brown]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 315 bytes --]

On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 10:30:39AM +0200, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
> 
> This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
> 
>     spi: pxa2xx: Add support for Intel Gemini Lake

Hrm, not a great problem with this but this is the first I heard of this
being proposed for stable?

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

Re: Patch "spi: pxa2xx: Add support for Intel Gemini Lake" has been added to the 4.9-stable tree

[Greg KH]

On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 09:39:09AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 10:30:39AM +0200, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
> > 
> > This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
> > 
> >     spi: pxa2xx: Add support for Intel Gemini Lake
> 
> Hrm, not a great problem with this but this is the first I heard of this
> being proposed for stable?

You should have been copied on the original patch submission from Sasha
for this to be included, let me dig...

Hm, I don't have my email archives on me, Sasha, you did cc: everyone,
right?

thanks,

greg k-h

Re: Patch "spi: pxa2xx: Add support for Intel Gemini Lake" has been added to the 4.9-stable tree

[Mark Brown]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 816 bytes --]

On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 10:42:56AM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 09:39:09AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:

> > Hrm, not a great problem with this but this is the first I heard of this
> > being proposed for stable?

> You should have been copied on the original patch submission from Sasha
> for this to be included, let me dig...

> Hm, I don't have my email archives on me, Sasha, you did cc: everyone,
> right?

Ah, so I was copied on a mail but I don't really pay attention to most
of the stable kernels other than the ones you maintain and it looked
like an "I've added this to my tree" it was sitting there unread, though
it did pass through my inbox.  Usually these things are more of a
"please pick for stable" than just a patch which caught me out a bit.
Like I say I was just surprised there.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]