From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:41334 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751760AbdJSNHn (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Oct 2017 09:07:43 -0400 Subject: Patch "bpf/verifier: reject BPF_ALU64|BPF_END" has been added to the 3.18-stable tree To: ecree@solarflare.com, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, davem@davemloft.net, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Cc: , From: Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2017 15:07:50 +0200 Message-ID: <150841847048216@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ANSI_X3.4-1968 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled bpf/verifier: reject BPF_ALU64|BPF_END to the 3.18-stable tree which can be found at: http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary The filename of the patch is: bpf-verifier-reject-bpf_alu64-bpf_end.patch and it can be found in the queue-3.18 subdirectory. If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let know about it. >>From foo@baz Thu Oct 19 14:44:13 CEST 2017 From: Edward Cree Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2017 14:37:38 +0100 Subject: bpf/verifier: reject BPF_ALU64|BPF_END From: Edward Cree [ Upstream commit e67b8a685c7c984e834e3181ef4619cd7025a136 ] Neither ___bpf_prog_run nor the JITs accept it. Also adds a new test case. Fixes: 17a5267067f3 ("bpf: verifier (add verifier core)") Signed-off-by: Edward Cree Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann Signed-off-by: David S. Miller Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c @@ -932,7 +932,8 @@ static int check_alu_op(struct reg_state } } else { if (insn->src_reg != BPF_REG_0 || insn->off != 0 || - (insn->imm != 16 && insn->imm != 32 && insn->imm != 64)) { + (insn->imm != 16 && insn->imm != 32 && insn->imm != 64) || + BPF_CLASS(insn->code) == BPF_ALU64) { verbose("BPF_END uses reserved fields\n"); return -EINVAL; } Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from ecree@solarflare.com are queue-3.18/bpf-verifier-reject-bpf_alu64-bpf_end.patch