From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: mhiramat@kernel.org, fengguang.wu@intel.com,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, hpa@zytor.com, mingo@kernel.org,
peterz@infradead.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "x86/decoder: Add new TEST instruction pattern" has been added to the 4.14-stable tree
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2017 13:40:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <151178642387245@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
x86/decoder: Add new TEST instruction pattern
to the 4.14-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
x86-decoder-add-new-test-instruction-pattern.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.14 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From 12a78d43de767eaf8fb272facb7a7b6f2dc6a9df Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2017 13:56:30 +0900
Subject: x86/decoder: Add new TEST instruction pattern
From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
commit 12a78d43de767eaf8fb272facb7a7b6f2dc6a9df upstream.
The kbuild test robot reported this build warning:
Warning: arch/x86/tools/test_get_len found difference at <jump_table>:ffffffff8103dd2c
Warning: ffffffff8103dd82: f6 09 d8 testb $0xd8,(%rcx)
Warning: objdump says 3 bytes, but insn_get_length() says 2
Warning: decoded and checked 1569014 instructions with 1 warnings
This sequence seems to be a new instruction not in the opcode map in the Intel SDM.
The instruction sequence is "F6 09 d8", means Group3(F6), MOD(00)REG(001)RM(001), and 0xd8.
Intel SDM vol2 A.4 Table A-6 said the table index in the group is "Encoding of Bits 5,4,3 of
the ModR/M Byte (bits 2,1,0 in parenthesis)"
In that table, opcodes listed by the index REG bits as:
000 001 010 011 100 101 110 111
TEST Ib/Iz,(undefined),NOT,NEG,MUL AL/rAX,IMUL AL/rAX,DIV AL/rAX,IDIV AL/rAX
So, it seems TEST Ib is assigned to 001.
Add the new pattern.
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
arch/x86/lib/x86-opcode-map.txt | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/arch/x86/lib/x86-opcode-map.txt
+++ b/arch/x86/lib/x86-opcode-map.txt
@@ -896,7 +896,7 @@ EndTable
GrpTable: Grp3_1
0: TEST Eb,Ib
-1:
+1: TEST Eb,Ib
2: NOT Eb
3: NEG Eb
4: MUL AL,Eb
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from mhiramat@kernel.org are
queue-4.14/x86-decoder-add-new-test-instruction-pattern.patch
reply other threads:[~2017-11-27 12:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=151178642387245@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).