stable.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: tytso@mit.edu, amir73il@gmail.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "ext4: fix interaction between i_size, fallocate, and delalloc after a crash" has been added to the 4.14-stable tree
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2017 17:04:25 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <15117986658024@kroah.com> (raw)


This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    ext4: fix interaction between i_size, fallocate, and delalloc after a crash

to the 4.14-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     ext4-fix-interaction-between-i_size-fallocate-and-delalloc-after-a-crash.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.14 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.


>From 51e3ae81ec58e95f10a98ef3dd6d7bce5d8e35a2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2017 23:09:55 -0400
Subject: ext4: fix interaction between i_size, fallocate, and delalloc after a crash

From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

commit 51e3ae81ec58e95f10a98ef3dd6d7bce5d8e35a2 upstream.

If there are pending writes subject to delayed allocation, then i_size
will show size after the writes have completed, while i_disksize
contains the value of i_size on the disk (since the writes have not
been persisted to disk).

If fallocate(2) is called with the FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE flag, either
with or without the FALLOC_FL_ZERO_RANGE flag set, and the new size
after the fallocate(2) is between i_size and i_disksize, then after a
crash, if a journal commit has resulted in the changes made by the
fallocate() call to be persisted after a crash, but the delayed
allocation write has not resolved itself, i_size would not be updated,
and this would cause the following e2fsck complaint:

Inode 12, end of extent exceeds allowed value
	(logical block 33, physical block 33441, len 7)

This can only take place on a sparse file, where the fallocate(2) call
is allocating blocks in a range which is before a pending delayed
allocation write which is extending i_size.  Since this situation is
quite rare, and the window in which the crash must take place is
typically < 30 seconds, in practice this condition will rarely happen.

Nevertheless, it can be triggered in testing, and in particular by
xfstests generic/456.

Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reported-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 fs/ext4/extents.c |    6 ++++--
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/ext4/extents.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/extents.c
@@ -4794,7 +4794,8 @@ static long ext4_zero_range(struct file
 	}
 
 	if (!(mode & FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE) &&
-	     offset + len > i_size_read(inode)) {
+	    (offset + len > i_size_read(inode) ||
+	     offset + len > EXT4_I(inode)->i_disksize)) {
 		new_size = offset + len;
 		ret = inode_newsize_ok(inode, new_size);
 		if (ret)
@@ -4965,7 +4966,8 @@ long ext4_fallocate(struct file *file, i
 	}
 
 	if (!(mode & FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE) &&
-	     offset + len > i_size_read(inode)) {
+	    (offset + len > i_size_read(inode) ||
+	     offset + len > EXT4_I(inode)->i_disksize)) {
 		new_size = offset + len;
 		ret = inode_newsize_ok(inode, new_size);
 		if (ret)


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from tytso@mit.edu are

queue-4.14/fscrypt-lock-mutex-before-checking-for-bounce-page-pool.patch
queue-4.14/ext4-prevent-data-corruption-with-journaling-dax.patch
queue-4.14/ext4-prevent-data-corruption-with-inline-data-dax.patch
queue-4.14/ext4-fix-interaction-between-i_size-fallocate-and-delalloc-after-a-crash.patch

                 reply	other threads:[~2017-11-27 16:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=15117986658024@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
    --cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).