From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: tytso@mit.edu, amir73il@gmail.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "ext4: fix interaction between i_size, fallocate, and delalloc after a crash" has been added to the 4.14-stable tree
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2017 17:04:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <15117986658024@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
ext4: fix interaction between i_size, fallocate, and delalloc after a crash
to the 4.14-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
ext4-fix-interaction-between-i_size-fallocate-and-delalloc-after-a-crash.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.14 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From 51e3ae81ec58e95f10a98ef3dd6d7bce5d8e35a2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2017 23:09:55 -0400
Subject: ext4: fix interaction between i_size, fallocate, and delalloc after a crash
From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
commit 51e3ae81ec58e95f10a98ef3dd6d7bce5d8e35a2 upstream.
If there are pending writes subject to delayed allocation, then i_size
will show size after the writes have completed, while i_disksize
contains the value of i_size on the disk (since the writes have not
been persisted to disk).
If fallocate(2) is called with the FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE flag, either
with or without the FALLOC_FL_ZERO_RANGE flag set, and the new size
after the fallocate(2) is between i_size and i_disksize, then after a
crash, if a journal commit has resulted in the changes made by the
fallocate() call to be persisted after a crash, but the delayed
allocation write has not resolved itself, i_size would not be updated,
and this would cause the following e2fsck complaint:
Inode 12, end of extent exceeds allowed value
(logical block 33, physical block 33441, len 7)
This can only take place on a sparse file, where the fallocate(2) call
is allocating blocks in a range which is before a pending delayed
allocation write which is extending i_size. Since this situation is
quite rare, and the window in which the crash must take place is
typically < 30 seconds, in practice this condition will rarely happen.
Nevertheless, it can be triggered in testing, and in particular by
xfstests generic/456.
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reported-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
fs/ext4/extents.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/ext4/extents.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/extents.c
@@ -4794,7 +4794,8 @@ static long ext4_zero_range(struct file
}
if (!(mode & FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE) &&
- offset + len > i_size_read(inode)) {
+ (offset + len > i_size_read(inode) ||
+ offset + len > EXT4_I(inode)->i_disksize)) {
new_size = offset + len;
ret = inode_newsize_ok(inode, new_size);
if (ret)
@@ -4965,7 +4966,8 @@ long ext4_fallocate(struct file *file, i
}
if (!(mode & FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE) &&
- offset + len > i_size_read(inode)) {
+ (offset + len > i_size_read(inode) ||
+ offset + len > EXT4_I(inode)->i_disksize)) {
new_size = offset + len;
ret = inode_newsize_ok(inode, new_size);
if (ret)
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from tytso@mit.edu are
queue-4.14/fscrypt-lock-mutex-before-checking-for-bounce-page-pool.patch
queue-4.14/ext4-prevent-data-corruption-with-journaling-dax.patch
queue-4.14/ext4-prevent-data-corruption-with-inline-data-dax.patch
queue-4.14/ext4-fix-interaction-between-i_size-fallocate-and-delalloc-after-a-crash.patch
reply other threads:[~2017-11-27 16:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=15117986658024@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).