From: Dan Jurgens <danielj@mellanox.com>
To: dledford@redhat.com, jgg@mellanox.com
Cc: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, paul@paul-moore.com,
ddutile@redhat.com, stable@vger.kernel.org, leon@kernel.org,
Daniel Jurgens <danielj@mellanox.com>
Subject: [PATCH rdma-rc v3] IB/core: Only enforce security for InfiniBand
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 00:01:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1511906481-92114-1-git-send-email-danielj@mellanox.com> (raw)
From: Daniel Jurgens <danielj@mellanox.com>
For now the only LSM security enforcement mechanism available is
specific to InfiniBand. Bypass enforcement for non-IB link types.
This fixes a regression where modify_qp fails for iWARP because
querying the PKEY returns -EINVAL.
Cc: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
Cc: Don Dutile <ddutile@redhat.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reported-by: Potnuri Bharat Teja <bharat@chelsio.com>
Fixes: d291f1a65232("IB/core: Enforce PKey security on QPs")
Fixes: 47a2b338fe63("IB/core: Enforce security on management datagrams")
Signed-off-by: Daniel Jurgens <danielj@mellanox.com>
Reviewed-by: Parav Pandit <parav@mellanox.com>
Tested-by: Potnuri Bharat Teja <bharat@chelsio.com>
Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
---
Changelog:
v2->v3: Fix build warning
v1->v2: Fixed build errors
v0->v1: Added proper SElinux patch
---
drivers/infiniband/core/security.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/security.c b/drivers/infiniband/core/security.c
index 209d057..5bc323f 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/core/security.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/security.c
@@ -417,8 +417,17 @@ void ib_close_shared_qp_security(struct ib_qp_security *sec)
int ib_create_qp_security(struct ib_qp *qp, struct ib_device *dev)
{
+ u8 i = rdma_start_port(dev);
+ bool is_ib = false;
int ret;
+ while (i <= rdma_end_port(dev) && !is_ib)
+ is_ib = rdma_protocol_ib(dev, i++);
+
+ /* If this isn't an IB device don't create the security context */
+ if (!is_ib)
+ return 0;
+
qp->qp_sec = kzalloc(sizeof(*qp->qp_sec), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!qp->qp_sec)
return -ENOMEM;
@@ -441,6 +450,10 @@ int ib_create_qp_security(struct ib_qp *qp, struct ib_device *dev)
void ib_destroy_qp_security_begin(struct ib_qp_security *sec)
{
+ /* Return if not IB */
+ if (!sec)
+ return;
+
mutex_lock(&sec->mutex);
/* Remove the QP from the lists so it won't get added to
@@ -470,6 +483,10 @@ void ib_destroy_qp_security_abort(struct ib_qp_security *sec)
int ret;
int i;
+ /* Return if not IB */
+ if (!sec)
+ return;
+
/* If a concurrent cache update is in progress this
* QP security could be marked for an error state
* transition. Wait for this to complete.
@@ -505,6 +522,10 @@ void ib_destroy_qp_security_end(struct ib_qp_security *sec)
{
int i;
+ /* Return if not IB */
+ if (!sec)
+ return;
+
/* If a concurrent cache update is occurring we must
* wait until this QP security structure is processed
* in the QP to error flow before destroying it because
@@ -557,7 +578,7 @@ int ib_security_modify_qp(struct ib_qp *qp,
{
int ret = 0;
struct ib_ports_pkeys *tmp_pps;
- struct ib_ports_pkeys *new_pps;
+ struct ib_ports_pkeys *new_pps = NULL;
struct ib_qp *real_qp = qp->real_qp;
bool special_qp = (real_qp->qp_type == IB_QPT_SMI ||
real_qp->qp_type == IB_QPT_GSI ||
@@ -565,17 +586,25 @@ int ib_security_modify_qp(struct ib_qp *qp,
bool pps_change = ((qp_attr_mask & (IB_QP_PKEY_INDEX | IB_QP_PORT)) ||
(qp_attr_mask & IB_QP_ALT_PATH));
+ WARN_ONCE((qp_attr_mask & IB_QP_PORT &&
+ rdma_protocol_ib(real_qp->device, qp_attr->port_num) &&
+ !real_qp->qp_sec),
+ "%s: QP security is not initialized for IB QP: %d\n",
+ __func__, real_qp->qp_num);
+
/* The port/pkey settings are maintained only for the real QP. Open
* handles on the real QP will be in the shared_qp_list. When
* enforcing security on the real QP all the shared QPs will be
* checked as well.
*/
- if (pps_change && !special_qp) {
+ if (pps_change && !special_qp && real_qp->qp_sec) {
mutex_lock(&real_qp->qp_sec->mutex);
new_pps = get_new_pps(real_qp,
qp_attr,
qp_attr_mask);
+ if (!new_pps)
+ return -ENOMEM;
/* Add this QP to the lists for the new port
* and pkey settings before checking for permission
@@ -600,7 +629,7 @@ int ib_security_modify_qp(struct ib_qp *qp,
qp_attr_mask,
udata);
- if (pps_change && !special_qp) {
+ if (new_pps) {
/* Clean up the lists and free the appropriate
* ports_pkeys structure.
*/
@@ -630,6 +659,9 @@ static int ib_security_pkey_access(struct ib_device *dev,
u16 pkey;
int ret;
+ if (!rdma_protocol_ib(dev, port_num))
+ return 0;
+
ret = ib_get_cached_pkey(dev, port_num, pkey_index, &pkey);
if (ret)
return ret;
@@ -663,6 +695,9 @@ int ib_mad_agent_security_setup(struct ib_mad_agent *agent,
{
int ret;
+ if (!rdma_protocol_ib(agent->device, agent->port_num))
+ return 0;
+
ret = security_ib_alloc_security(&agent->security);
if (ret)
return ret;
@@ -688,6 +723,9 @@ int ib_mad_agent_security_setup(struct ib_mad_agent *agent,
void ib_mad_agent_security_cleanup(struct ib_mad_agent *agent)
{
+ if (!rdma_protocol_ib(agent->device, agent->port_num))
+ return;
+
security_ib_free_security(agent->security);
if (agent->lsm_nb_reg)
unregister_lsm_notifier(&agent->lsm_nb);
@@ -695,6 +733,9 @@ void ib_mad_agent_security_cleanup(struct ib_mad_agent *agent)
int ib_mad_enforce_security(struct ib_mad_agent_private *map, u16 pkey_index)
{
+ if (!rdma_protocol_ib(map->agent.device, map->agent.port_num))
+ return 0;
+
if (map->agent.qp->qp_type == IB_QPT_SMI && !map->agent.smp_allowed)
return -EACCES;
--
1.8.3.1
next reply other threads:[~2017-11-28 22:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-28 22:01 Dan Jurgens [this message]
2017-11-29 7:08 ` [PATCH rdma-rc v3] IB/core: Only enforce security for InfiniBand Yuval Shaia
2017-11-29 13:49 ` Daniel Jurgens
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1511906481-92114-1-git-send-email-danielj@mellanox.com \
--to=danielj@mellanox.com \
--cc=ddutile@redhat.com \
--cc=dledford@redhat.com \
--cc=jgg@mellanox.com \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).