Patch "cxl: Check if vphb exists before iterating over AFU devices" has been added to the 4.14-stable tree

Patch "cxl: Check if vphb exists before iterating over AFU devices" has been added to the 4.14-stable tree

[gregkh]

This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    cxl: Check if vphb exists before iterating over AFU devices

to the 4.14-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     cxl-check-if-vphb-exists-before-iterating-over-afu-devices.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.14 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.


>From 12841f87b7a8ceb3d54f171660f72a86941bfcb3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vaibhav Jain <vaibhav@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2017 09:08:57 +0530
Subject: cxl: Check if vphb exists before iterating over AFU devices

From: Vaibhav Jain <vaibhav@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

commit 12841f87b7a8ceb3d54f171660f72a86941bfcb3 upstream.

During an eeh a kernel-oops is reported if no vPHB is allocated to the
AFU. This happens as during AFU init, an error in creation of vPHB is
a non-fatal error. Hence afu->phb should always be checked for NULL
before iterating over it for the virtual AFU pci devices.

This patch fixes the kenel-oops by adding a NULL pointer check for
afu->phb before it is dereferenced.

Fixes: 9e8df8a21963 ("cxl: EEH support")
Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Jain <vaibhav@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Andrew Donnellan <andrew.donnellan@au1.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/misc/cxl/pci.c |   12 ++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/misc/cxl/pci.c
+++ b/drivers/misc/cxl/pci.c
@@ -2043,6 +2043,9 @@ static pci_ers_result_t cxl_vphb_error_d
 	/* There should only be one entry, but go through the list
 	 * anyway
 	 */
+	if (afu->phb == NULL)
+		return result;
+
 	list_for_each_entry(afu_dev, &afu->phb->bus->devices, bus_list) {
 		if (!afu_dev->driver)
 			continue;
@@ -2084,8 +2087,7 @@ static pci_ers_result_t cxl_pci_error_de
 			 * Tell the AFU drivers; but we don't care what they
 			 * say, we're going away.
 			 */
-			if (afu->phb != NULL)
-				cxl_vphb_error_detected(afu, state);
+			cxl_vphb_error_detected(afu, state);
 		}
 		return PCI_ERS_RESULT_DISCONNECT;
 	}
@@ -2225,6 +2227,9 @@ static pci_ers_result_t cxl_pci_slot_res
 		if (cxl_afu_select_best_mode(afu))
 			goto err;
 
+		if (afu->phb == NULL)
+			continue;
+
 		list_for_each_entry(afu_dev, &afu->phb->bus->devices, bus_list) {
 			/* Reset the device context.
 			 * TODO: make this less disruptive
@@ -2287,6 +2292,9 @@ static void cxl_pci_resume(struct pci_de
 	for (i = 0; i < adapter->slices; i++) {
 		afu = adapter->afu[i];
 
+		if (afu->phb == NULL)
+			continue;
+
 		list_for_each_entry(afu_dev, &afu->phb->bus->devices, bus_list) {
 			if (afu_dev->driver && afu_dev->driver->err_handler &&
 			    afu_dev->driver->err_handler->resume)


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from vaibhav@linux.vnet.ibm.com are

queue-4.14/cxl-check-if-vphb-exists-before-iterating-over-afu-devices.patch