stable.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: jibin.xu@windriver.com, alexander.levin@verizon.com,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "sysrq : fix Show Regs call trace on ARM" has been added to the 3.18-stable tree
Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2017 18:31:00 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <151249506035154@kroah.com> (raw)


This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    sysrq : fix Show Regs call trace on ARM

to the 3.18-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     sysrq-fix-show-regs-call-trace-on-arm.patch
and it can be found in the queue-3.18 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.


>From foo@baz Tue Dec  5 18:18:39 CET 2017
From: Jibin Xu <jibin.xu@windriver.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2017 20:11:42 -0700
Subject: sysrq : fix Show Regs call trace on ARM

From: Jibin Xu <jibin.xu@windriver.com>


[ Upstream commit b00bebbc301c8e1f74f230dc82282e56b7e7a6db ]

When kernel configuration SMP,PREEMPT and DEBUG_PREEMPT are enabled,
echo 1 >/proc/sys/kernel/sysrq
echo p >/proc/sysrq-trigger
kernel will print call trace as below:

sysrq: SysRq : Show Regs
BUG: using __this_cpu_read() in preemptible [00000000] code: sh/435
caller is __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x18/0x20
Call trace:
[<ffffff8008088e80>] dump_backtrace+0x0/0x1d0
[<ffffff8008089074>] show_stack+0x24/0x30
[<ffffff8008447970>] dump_stack+0x90/0xb0
[<ffffff8008463950>] check_preemption_disabled+0x100/0x108
[<ffffff8008463998>] __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x18/0x20
[<ffffff80084c9194>] sysrq_handle_showregs+0x1c/0x40
[<ffffff80084c9c7c>] __handle_sysrq+0x12c/0x1a0
[<ffffff80084ca140>] write_sysrq_trigger+0x60/0x70
[<ffffff8008251e00>] proc_reg_write+0x90/0xd0
[<ffffff80081f1788>] __vfs_write+0x48/0x90
[<ffffff80081f241c>] vfs_write+0xa4/0x190
[<ffffff80081f3354>] SyS_write+0x54/0xb0
[<ffffff80080833f0>] el0_svc_naked+0x24/0x28

This can be seen on a common board like an r-pi3.
This happens because when echo p >/proc/sysrq-trigger,
get_irq_regs() is called outside of IRQ context,
if preemption is enabled in this situation,kernel will
print the call trace. Since many prior discussions on
the mailing lists have made it clear that get_irq_regs
either just returns NULL or stale data when used outside
of IRQ context,we simply avoid calling it outside of
IRQ context.

Signed-off-by: Jibin Xu <jibin.xu@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@verizon.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 drivers/tty/sysrq.c |    9 +++++++--
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/tty/sysrq.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/sysrq.c
@@ -237,8 +237,10 @@ static void sysrq_handle_showallcpus(int
 	 * architecture has no support for it:
 	 */
 	if (!trigger_all_cpu_backtrace()) {
-		struct pt_regs *regs = get_irq_regs();
+		struct pt_regs *regs = NULL;
 
+		if (in_irq())
+			regs = get_irq_regs();
 		if (regs) {
 			printk(KERN_INFO "CPU%d:\n", smp_processor_id());
 			show_regs(regs);
@@ -257,7 +259,10 @@ static struct sysrq_key_op sysrq_showall
 
 static void sysrq_handle_showregs(int key)
 {
-	struct pt_regs *regs = get_irq_regs();
+	struct pt_regs *regs = NULL;
+
+	if (in_irq())
+		regs = get_irq_regs();
 	if (regs)
 		show_regs(regs);
 	perf_event_print_debug();


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from jibin.xu@windriver.com are

queue-3.18/sysrq-fix-show-regs-call-trace-on-arm.patch

                 reply	other threads:[~2017-12-05 17:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=151249506035154@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=alexander.levin@verizon.com \
    --cc=jibin.xu@windriver.com \
    --cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).