From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "s390/runtime instrumentation: simplify task exit handling" has been added to the 4.14-stable tree
Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2017 08:45:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <151254630277155@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
s390/runtime instrumentation: simplify task exit handling
to the 4.14-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
s390-runtime-instrumentation-simplify-task-exit-handling.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.14 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From 8d9047f8b967ce6181fd824ae922978e1b055cc0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2017 11:24:22 +0200
Subject: s390/runtime instrumentation: simplify task exit handling
From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
commit 8d9047f8b967ce6181fd824ae922978e1b055cc0 upstream.
Free data structures required for runtime instrumentation from
arch_release_task_struct(). This allows to simplify the code a bit,
and also makes the semantics a bit easier: arch_release_task_struct()
is never called from the task that is being removed.
In addition this allows to get rid of exit_thread() in a later patch.
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
arch/s390/include/asm/runtime_instr.h | 4 +++-
arch/s390/kernel/process.c | 5 ++---
arch/s390/kernel/runtime_instr.c | 30 +++++++++++++++---------------
3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/s390/include/asm/runtime_instr.h
+++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/runtime_instr.h
@@ -86,6 +86,8 @@ static inline void restore_ri_cb(struct
load_runtime_instr_cb(&runtime_instr_empty_cb);
}
-void exit_thread_runtime_instr(void);
+struct task_struct;
+
+void runtime_instr_release(struct task_struct *tsk);
#endif /* _RUNTIME_INSTR_H */
--- a/arch/s390/kernel/process.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kernel/process.c
@@ -49,10 +49,8 @@ extern void kernel_thread_starter(void);
*/
void exit_thread(struct task_struct *tsk)
{
- if (tsk == current) {
- exit_thread_runtime_instr();
+ if (tsk == current)
exit_thread_gs();
- }
}
void flush_thread(void)
@@ -65,6 +63,7 @@ void release_thread(struct task_struct *
void arch_release_task_struct(struct task_struct *tsk)
{
+ runtime_instr_release(tsk);
}
int arch_dup_task_struct(struct task_struct *dst, struct task_struct *src)
--- a/arch/s390/kernel/runtime_instr.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kernel/runtime_instr.c
@@ -21,11 +21,24 @@
/* empty control block to disable RI by loading it */
struct runtime_instr_cb runtime_instr_empty_cb;
+void runtime_instr_release(struct task_struct *tsk)
+{
+ kfree(tsk->thread.ri_cb);
+}
+
static void disable_runtime_instr(void)
{
- struct pt_regs *regs = task_pt_regs(current);
+ struct task_struct *task = current;
+ struct pt_regs *regs;
+ if (!task->thread.ri_cb)
+ return;
+ regs = task_pt_regs(task);
+ preempt_disable();
load_runtime_instr_cb(&runtime_instr_empty_cb);
+ kfree(task->thread.ri_cb);
+ task->thread.ri_cb = NULL;
+ preempt_enable();
/*
* Make sure the RI bit is deleted from the PSW. If the user did not
@@ -46,19 +59,6 @@ static void init_runtime_instr_cb(struct
cb->valid = 1;
}
-void exit_thread_runtime_instr(void)
-{
- struct task_struct *task = current;
-
- preempt_disable();
- if (!task->thread.ri_cb)
- return;
- disable_runtime_instr();
- kfree(task->thread.ri_cb);
- task->thread.ri_cb = NULL;
- preempt_enable();
-}
-
SYSCALL_DEFINE1(s390_runtime_instr, int, command)
{
struct runtime_instr_cb *cb;
@@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE1(s390_runtime_instr, int,
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
if (command == S390_RUNTIME_INSTR_STOP) {
- exit_thread_runtime_instr();
+ disable_runtime_instr();
return 0;
}
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com are
queue-4.14/s390-runtime-instrumentation-simplify-task-exit-handling.patch
reply other threads:[~2017-12-06 7:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=151254630277155@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).