stable.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: g.nault@alphalink.fr, alexander.levin@verizon.com,
	davem@davemloft.net, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "l2tp: take remote address into account in l2tp_ip and l2tp_ip6 socket lookups" has been added to the 4.9-stable tree
Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2017 17:59:33 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1512579573165124@kroah.com> (raw)


This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    l2tp: take remote address into account in l2tp_ip and l2tp_ip6 socket lookups

to the 4.9-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     l2tp-take-remote-address-into-account-in-l2tp_ip-and-l2tp_ip6-socket-lookups.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.9 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.


>From foo@baz Wed Dec  6 17:39:55 CET 2017
From: Guillaume Nault <g.nault@alphalink.fr>
Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2016 19:48:20 +0100
Subject: l2tp: take remote address into account in l2tp_ip and l2tp_ip6 socket lookups

From: Guillaume Nault <g.nault@alphalink.fr>


[ Upstream commit a9b2dff80be979432484afaf7f8d8e73f9e8838a ]

For connected sockets, __l2tp_ip{,6}_bind_lookup() needs to check the
remote IP when looking for a matching socket. Otherwise a connected
socket can receive traffic not originating from its peer.

Drop l2tp_ip_bind_lookup() and l2tp_ip6_bind_lookup() instead of
updating their prototype, as these functions aren't used.

Signed-off-by: Guillaume Nault <g.nault@alphalink.fr>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@verizon.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 net/l2tp/l2tp_ip.c  |   19 ++++++-------------
 net/l2tp/l2tp_ip6.c |   20 ++++++--------------
 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)

--- a/net/l2tp/l2tp_ip.c
+++ b/net/l2tp/l2tp_ip.c
@@ -48,7 +48,8 @@ static inline struct l2tp_ip_sock *l2tp_
 	return (struct l2tp_ip_sock *)sk;
 }
 
-static struct sock *__l2tp_ip_bind_lookup(struct net *net, __be32 laddr, int dif, u32 tunnel_id)
+static struct sock *__l2tp_ip_bind_lookup(const struct net *net, __be32 laddr,
+					  __be32 raddr, int dif, u32 tunnel_id)
 {
 	struct sock *sk;
 
@@ -62,6 +63,7 @@ static struct sock *__l2tp_ip_bind_looku
 		if ((l2tp->conn_id == tunnel_id) &&
 		    net_eq(sock_net(sk), net) &&
 		    !(inet->inet_rcv_saddr && inet->inet_rcv_saddr != laddr) &&
+		    (!inet->inet_daddr || !raddr || inet->inet_daddr == raddr) &&
 		    (!sk->sk_bound_dev_if || !dif ||
 		     sk->sk_bound_dev_if == dif))
 			goto found;
@@ -72,15 +74,6 @@ found:
 	return sk;
 }
 
-static inline struct sock *l2tp_ip_bind_lookup(struct net *net, __be32 laddr, int dif, u32 tunnel_id)
-{
-	struct sock *sk = __l2tp_ip_bind_lookup(net, laddr, dif, tunnel_id);
-	if (sk)
-		sock_hold(sk);
-
-	return sk;
-}
-
 /* When processing receive frames, there are two cases to
  * consider. Data frames consist of a non-zero session-id and an
  * optional cookie. Control frames consist of a regular L2TP header
@@ -186,8 +179,8 @@ pass_up:
 		struct iphdr *iph = (struct iphdr *) skb_network_header(skb);
 
 		read_lock_bh(&l2tp_ip_lock);
-		sk = __l2tp_ip_bind_lookup(net, iph->daddr, inet_iif(skb),
-					   tunnel_id);
+		sk = __l2tp_ip_bind_lookup(net, iph->daddr, iph->saddr,
+					   inet_iif(skb), tunnel_id);
 		if (!sk) {
 			read_unlock_bh(&l2tp_ip_lock);
 			goto discard;
@@ -289,7 +282,7 @@ static int l2tp_ip_bind(struct sock *sk,
 		inet->inet_saddr = 0;  /* Use device */
 
 	write_lock_bh(&l2tp_ip_lock);
-	if (__l2tp_ip_bind_lookup(net, addr->l2tp_addr.s_addr,
+	if (__l2tp_ip_bind_lookup(net, addr->l2tp_addr.s_addr, 0,
 				  sk->sk_bound_dev_if, addr->l2tp_conn_id)) {
 		write_unlock_bh(&l2tp_ip_lock);
 		ret = -EADDRINUSE;
--- a/net/l2tp/l2tp_ip6.c
+++ b/net/l2tp/l2tp_ip6.c
@@ -59,12 +59,14 @@ static inline struct l2tp_ip6_sock *l2tp
 
 static struct sock *__l2tp_ip6_bind_lookup(struct net *net,
 					   struct in6_addr *laddr,
+					   const struct in6_addr *raddr,
 					   int dif, u32 tunnel_id)
 {
 	struct sock *sk;
 
 	sk_for_each_bound(sk, &l2tp_ip6_bind_table) {
 		const struct in6_addr *sk_laddr = inet6_rcv_saddr(sk);
+		const struct in6_addr *sk_raddr = &sk->sk_v6_daddr;
 		struct l2tp_ip6_sock *l2tp = l2tp_ip6_sk(sk);
 
 		if (l2tp == NULL)
@@ -73,6 +75,7 @@ static struct sock *__l2tp_ip6_bind_look
 		if ((l2tp->conn_id == tunnel_id) &&
 		    net_eq(sock_net(sk), net) &&
 		    (!sk_laddr || ipv6_addr_any(sk_laddr) || ipv6_addr_equal(sk_laddr, laddr)) &&
+		    (!raddr || ipv6_addr_any(sk_raddr) || ipv6_addr_equal(sk_raddr, raddr)) &&
 		    (!sk->sk_bound_dev_if || !dif ||
 		     sk->sk_bound_dev_if == dif))
 			goto found;
@@ -83,17 +86,6 @@ found:
 	return sk;
 }
 
-static inline struct sock *l2tp_ip6_bind_lookup(struct net *net,
-						struct in6_addr *laddr,
-						int dif, u32 tunnel_id)
-{
-	struct sock *sk = __l2tp_ip6_bind_lookup(net, laddr, dif, tunnel_id);
-	if (sk)
-		sock_hold(sk);
-
-	return sk;
-}
-
 /* When processing receive frames, there are two cases to
  * consider. Data frames consist of a non-zero session-id and an
  * optional cookie. Control frames consist of a regular L2TP header
@@ -200,8 +192,8 @@ pass_up:
 		struct ipv6hdr *iph = ipv6_hdr(skb);
 
 		read_lock_bh(&l2tp_ip6_lock);
-		sk = __l2tp_ip6_bind_lookup(net, &iph->daddr, inet6_iif(skb),
-					    tunnel_id);
+		sk = __l2tp_ip6_bind_lookup(net, &iph->daddr, &iph->saddr,
+					    inet6_iif(skb), tunnel_id);
 		if (!sk) {
 			read_unlock_bh(&l2tp_ip6_lock);
 			goto discard;
@@ -339,7 +331,7 @@ static int l2tp_ip6_bind(struct sock *sk
 	rcu_read_unlock();
 
 	write_lock_bh(&l2tp_ip6_lock);
-	if (__l2tp_ip6_bind_lookup(net, &addr->l2tp_addr, bound_dev_if,
+	if (__l2tp_ip6_bind_lookup(net, &addr->l2tp_addr, NULL, bound_dev_if,
 				   addr->l2tp_conn_id)) {
 		write_unlock_bh(&l2tp_ip6_lock);
 		err = -EADDRINUSE;


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from g.nault@alphalink.fr are

queue-4.9/l2tp-take-remote-address-into-account-in-l2tp_ip-and-l2tp_ip6-socket-lookups.patch

                 reply	other threads:[~2017-12-06 17:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1512579573165124@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=alexander.levin@verizon.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=g.nault@alphalink.fr \
    --cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).