stable.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: luto@kernel.org, alexander.levin@verizon.com, bpetkov@suse.de,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, mingo@kernel.org,
	peterz@infradead.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
	torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "selftests/x86/ldt_gdt: Robustify against set_thread_area() and LAR oddities" has been added to the 4.14-stable tree
Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2017 18:26:33 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1512581193213133@kroah.com> (raw)


This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    selftests/x86/ldt_gdt: Robustify against set_thread_area() and LAR oddities

to the 4.14-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     selftests-x86-ldt_gdt-robustify-against-set_thread_area-and-lar-oddities.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.14 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.


>From foo@baz Wed Dec  6 18:04:41 CET 2017
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2017 04:19:49 -0700
Subject: selftests/x86/ldt_gdt: Robustify against set_thread_area() and LAR oddities

From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>


[ Upstream commit d60ad744c9741586010d4bea286f09a063a90fbd ]

Bits 19:16 of LAR's result are undefined, and some upcoming
improvements to the test case seem to trigger this.  Mask off those
bits to avoid spurious failures.

commit 5b781c7e317f ("x86/tls: Forcibly set the accessed bit in TLS
segments") adds a valid case in which LAR's output doesn't quite
agree with set_thread_area()'s input.  This isn't triggered in the
test as is, but it will be if we start calling set_thread_area()
with the accessed bit clear.  Work around this discrepency.

I've added a Fixes tag so that -stable can pick this up if neccesary.

Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bpetkov@suse.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Fixes: 5b781c7e317f ("x86/tls: Forcibly set the accessed bit in TLS segments")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/b82f3f89c034b53580970ac865139fd8863f44e2.1509794321.git.luto@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@verizon.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/x86/ldt_gdt.c |   10 +++++++++-
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/ldt_gdt.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/ldt_gdt.c
@@ -115,7 +115,15 @@ static void check_valid_segment(uint16_t
 		return;
 	}
 
-	if (ar != expected_ar) {
+	/* The SDM says "bits 19:16 are undefined".  Thanks. */
+	ar &= ~0xF0000;
+
+	/*
+	 * NB: Different Linux versions do different things with the
+	 * accessed bit in set_thread_area().
+	 */
+	if (ar != expected_ar &&
+	    (ldt || ar != (expected_ar | AR_ACCESSED))) {
 		printf("[FAIL]\t%s entry %hu has AR 0x%08X but expected 0x%08X\n",
 		       (ldt ? "LDT" : "GDT"), index, ar, expected_ar);
 		nerrs++;


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from luto@kernel.org are

queue-4.14/selftests-x86-ldt_get-add-a-few-additional-tests-for-limits.patch
queue-4.14/selftests-x86-ldt_gdt-robustify-against-set_thread_area-and-lar-oddities.patch
queue-4.14/x86-entry-use-syscall_define-macros-for-sys_modify_ldt.patch

                 reply	other threads:[~2017-12-06 17:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1512581193213133@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=alexander.levin@verizon.com \
    --cc=bpetkov@suse.de \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).