stable.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: tlfalcon@linux.vnet.ibm.com, alexander.levin@verizon.com,
	davem@davemloft.net, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "ibmvnic: Allocate number of rx/tx buffers agreed on by firmware" has been added to the 4.9-stable tree
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2017 13:33:27 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <151308200714239@kroah.com> (raw)


This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    ibmvnic: Allocate number of rx/tx buffers agreed on by firmware

to the 4.9-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     ibmvnic-allocate-number-of-rx-tx-buffers-agreed-on-by-firmware.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.9 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.


>From foo@baz Tue Dec 12 13:26:17 CET 2017
From: Thomas Falcon <tlfalcon@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Mar 2017 12:18:42 -0600
Subject: ibmvnic: Allocate number of rx/tx buffers agreed on by firmware

From: Thomas Falcon <tlfalcon@linux.vnet.ibm.com>


[ Upstream commit 068d9f90a6978c3e3a662d9e85204a7d6be240d2 ]

The amount of TX/RX buffers that the vNIC driver currently allocates
is different from the amount agreed upon in negotiation with firmware.
Correct that by allocating the requested number of buffers confirmed
by firmware.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Falcon <tlfalcon@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@verizon.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c |   16 ++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c
@@ -404,7 +404,7 @@ static int ibmvnic_open(struct net_devic
 	send_map_query(adapter);
 	for (i = 0; i < rxadd_subcrqs; i++) {
 		init_rx_pool(adapter, &adapter->rx_pool[i],
-			     IBMVNIC_BUFFS_PER_POOL, i,
+			     adapter->req_rx_add_entries_per_subcrq, i,
 			     be64_to_cpu(size_array[i]), 1);
 		if (alloc_rx_pool(adapter, &adapter->rx_pool[i])) {
 			dev_err(dev, "Couldn't alloc rx pool\n");
@@ -419,23 +419,23 @@ static int ibmvnic_open(struct net_devic
 	for (i = 0; i < tx_subcrqs; i++) {
 		tx_pool = &adapter->tx_pool[i];
 		tx_pool->tx_buff =
-		    kcalloc(adapter->max_tx_entries_per_subcrq,
+		    kcalloc(adapter->req_tx_entries_per_subcrq,
 			    sizeof(struct ibmvnic_tx_buff), GFP_KERNEL);
 		if (!tx_pool->tx_buff)
 			goto tx_pool_alloc_failed;
 
 		if (alloc_long_term_buff(adapter, &tx_pool->long_term_buff,
-					 adapter->max_tx_entries_per_subcrq *
+					 adapter->req_tx_entries_per_subcrq *
 					 adapter->req_mtu))
 			goto tx_ltb_alloc_failed;
 
 		tx_pool->free_map =
-		    kcalloc(adapter->max_tx_entries_per_subcrq,
+		    kcalloc(adapter->req_tx_entries_per_subcrq,
 			    sizeof(int), GFP_KERNEL);
 		if (!tx_pool->free_map)
 			goto tx_fm_alloc_failed;
 
-		for (j = 0; j < adapter->max_tx_entries_per_subcrq; j++)
+		for (j = 0; j < adapter->req_tx_entries_per_subcrq; j++)
 			tx_pool->free_map[j] = j;
 
 		tx_pool->consumer_index = 0;
@@ -746,7 +746,7 @@ static int ibmvnic_xmit(struct sk_buff *
 
 	tx_pool->consumer_index =
 	    (tx_pool->consumer_index + 1) %
-		adapter->max_tx_entries_per_subcrq;
+		adapter->req_tx_entries_per_subcrq;
 
 	tx_buff = &tx_pool->tx_buff[index];
 	tx_buff->skb = skb;
@@ -819,7 +819,7 @@ static int ibmvnic_xmit(struct sk_buff *
 
 		if (tx_pool->consumer_index == 0)
 			tx_pool->consumer_index =
-				adapter->max_tx_entries_per_subcrq - 1;
+				adapter->req_tx_entries_per_subcrq - 1;
 		else
 			tx_pool->consumer_index--;
 
@@ -1400,7 +1400,7 @@ restart_loop:
 						     producer_index] = index;
 			adapter->tx_pool[pool].producer_index =
 			    (adapter->tx_pool[pool].producer_index + 1) %
-			    adapter->max_tx_entries_per_subcrq;
+			    adapter->req_tx_entries_per_subcrq;
 		}
 		/* remove tx_comp scrq*/
 		next->tx_comp.first = 0;


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from tlfalcon@linux.vnet.ibm.com are

queue-4.9/ibmvnic-allocate-number-of-rx-tx-buffers-agreed-on-by-firmware.patch
queue-4.9/ibmvnic-fix-overflowing-firmware-hardware-tx-queue.patch

                 reply	other threads:[~2017-12-12 12:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=151308200714239@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=alexander.levin@verizon.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tlfalcon@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).