stable.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: privat@egil-hjelmeland.no, alexander.levin@verizon.com,
	andrew@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "net: dsa: lan9303: Do not disable switch fabric port 0 at .probe" has been added to the 4.14-stable tree
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 13:57:15 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <151360183571213@kroah.com> (raw)


This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    net: dsa: lan9303: Do not disable switch fabric port 0 at .probe

to the 4.14-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     net-dsa-lan9303-do-not-disable-switch-fabric-port-0-at-.probe.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.14 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.


>From foo@baz Mon Dec 18 13:28:59 CET 2017
From: Egil Hjelmeland <privat@egil-hjelmeland.no>
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2017 17:14:10 +0200
Subject: net: dsa: lan9303: Do not disable switch fabric port 0 at .probe

From: Egil Hjelmeland <privat@egil-hjelmeland.no>


[ Upstream commit 3c91b0c1de8d013490bbc41ce9ee8810ea5baddd ]

Make the LAN9303 work when lan9303_probe() is called twice.

For some unknown reason the LAN9303 switch fail to forward data when switch
fabric port 0 TX is disabled during probe. (Write of LAN9303_MAC_TX_CFG_0
in lan9303_disable_processing_port().)

In that situation the switch fabric seem to receive frames, because the ALR
is learning addresses. But no frames are transmitted on any of the ports.

In our system lan9303_probe() is called twice, first time
dsa_register_switch() return -EPROBE_DEFER. As an experiment, modified the
code to skip writing LAN9303_MAC_TX_CFG_0, port 0 during the first probe.
Then the switch works as expected.

Resolve the problem by not calling lan9303_disable_processing_port() on
port 0 during probe. Ports 1 and 2 are still disabled.

Although unsatisfying that the exact failure mechanism is not known,
the patch should not cause any harm.

Signed-off-by: Egil Hjelmeland <privat@egil-hjelmeland.no>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@verizon.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 drivers/net/dsa/lan9303-core.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/drivers/net/dsa/lan9303-core.c
+++ b/drivers/net/dsa/lan9303-core.c
@@ -569,7 +569,7 @@ static int lan9303_disable_processing(st
 {
 	int p;
 
-	for (p = 0; p < LAN9303_NUM_PORTS; p++) {
+	for (p = 1; p < LAN9303_NUM_PORTS; p++) {
 		int ret = lan9303_disable_processing_port(chip, p);
 
 		if (ret)


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from privat@egil-hjelmeland.no are

queue-4.14/net-dsa-lan9303-do-not-disable-switch-fabric-port-0-at-.probe.patch

                 reply	other threads:[~2017-12-18 12:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=151360183571213@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=alexander.levin@verizon.com \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=privat@egil-hjelmeland.no \
    --cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).