From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: mchristi@redhat.com, alexander.levin@verizon.com,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, nab@linux-iscsi.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "target: fix race during implicit transition work flushes" has been added to the 4.9-stable tree
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 14:23:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <151360341810695@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
target: fix race during implicit transition work flushes
to the 4.9-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
target-fix-race-during-implicit-transition-work-flushes.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.9 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From foo@baz Mon Dec 18 14:12:34 CET 2017
From: Mike Christie <mchristi@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2017 04:59:50 -0600
Subject: target: fix race during implicit transition work flushes
From: Mike Christie <mchristi@redhat.com>
[ Upstream commit 760bf578edf8122f2503a3a6a3f4b0de3b6ce0bb ]
This fixes the following races:
1. core_alua_do_transition_tg_pt could have read
tg_pt_gp_alua_access_state and gone into this if chunk:
if (!explicit &&
atomic_read(&tg_pt_gp->tg_pt_gp_alua_access_state) ==
ALUA_ACCESS_STATE_TRANSITION) {
and then core_alua_do_transition_tg_pt_work could update the
state. core_alua_do_transition_tg_pt would then only set
tg_pt_gp_alua_pending_state and the tg_pt_gp_alua_access_state would
not get updated with the second calls state.
2. core_alua_do_transition_tg_pt could be setting
tg_pt_gp_transition_complete while the tg_pt_gp_transition_work
is already completing. core_alua_do_transition_tg_pt then waits on the
completion that will never be called.
To handle these issues, we just call flush_work which will return when
core_alua_do_transition_tg_pt_work has completed so there is no need
to do the complete/wait. And, if core_alua_do_transition_tg_pt_work
was running, instead of trying to sneak in the state change, we just
schedule up another core_alua_do_transition_tg_pt_work call.
Note that this does not handle a possible race where there are multiple
threads call core_alua_do_transition_tg_pt at the same time. I think
we need a mutex in target_tg_pt_gp_alua_access_state_store.
Signed-off-by: Mike Christie <mchristi@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Bellinger <nab@linux-iscsi.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@verizon.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/target/target_core_alua.c | 10 +---------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 9 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/target/target_core_alua.c
+++ b/drivers/target/target_core_alua.c
@@ -1073,16 +1073,8 @@ static int core_alua_do_transition_tg_pt
/*
* Flush any pending transitions
*/
- if (!explicit && atomic_read(&tg_pt_gp->tg_pt_gp_alua_access_state) ==
- ALUA_ACCESS_STATE_TRANSITION) {
- /* Just in case */
- tg_pt_gp->tg_pt_gp_alua_pending_state = new_state;
- tg_pt_gp->tg_pt_gp_transition_complete = &wait;
+ if (!explicit)
flush_work(&tg_pt_gp->tg_pt_gp_transition_work);
- wait_for_completion(&wait);
- tg_pt_gp->tg_pt_gp_transition_complete = NULL;
- return 0;
- }
/*
* Save the old primary ALUA access state, and set the current state
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from mchristi@redhat.com are
queue-4.9/target-use-system-workqueue-for-alua-transitions.patch
queue-4.9/target-iscsi-fix-a-race-condition-in-iscsit_add_reject_from_cmd.patch
queue-4.9/target-fix-alua-transition-timeout-handling.patch
queue-4.9/target-fix-race-during-implicit-transition-work-flushes.patch
reply other threads:[~2017-12-18 13:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=151360341810695@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=alexander.levin@verizon.com \
--cc=mchristi@redhat.com \
--cc=nab@linux-iscsi.org \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).