From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:51444 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758885AbdLRNxl (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Dec 2017 08:53:41 -0500 Subject: Patch "bcache: fix wrong cache_misses statistics" has been added to the 4.4-stable tree To: tang.junhui@zte.com.cn, alexander.levin@verizon.com, axboe@kernel.dk, colyli@suse.de, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, mlyle@lyle.org Cc: , From: Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 14:53:23 +0100 Message-ID: <1513605203052@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ANSI_X3.4-1968 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled bcache: fix wrong cache_misses statistics to the 4.4-stable tree which can be found at: http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary The filename of the patch is: bcache-fix-wrong-cache_misses-statistics.patch and it can be found in the queue-4.4 subdirectory. If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let know about it. >>From foo@baz Mon Dec 18 14:47:43 CET 2017 From: "tang.junhui" Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2017 14:46:34 -0700 Subject: bcache: fix wrong cache_misses statistics From: "tang.junhui" [ Upstream commit c157313791a999646901b3e3c6888514ebc36d62 ] Currently, Cache missed IOs are identified by s->cache_miss, but actually, there are many situations that missed IOs are not assigned a value for s->cache_miss in cached_dev_cache_miss(), for example, a bypassed IO (s->iop.bypass = 1), or the cache_bio allocate failed. In these situations, it will go to out_put or out_submit, and s->cache_miss is null, which leads bch_mark_cache_accounting() to treat this IO as a hit IO. [ML: applied by 3-way merge] Signed-off-by: tang.junhui Reviewed-by: Michael Lyle Reviewed-by: Coly Li Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- drivers/md/bcache/request.c | 6 +++++- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) --- a/drivers/md/bcache/request.c +++ b/drivers/md/bcache/request.c @@ -468,6 +468,7 @@ struct search { unsigned recoverable:1; unsigned write:1; unsigned read_dirty_data:1; + unsigned cache_missed:1; unsigned long start_time; @@ -653,6 +654,7 @@ static inline struct search *search_allo s->orig_bio = bio; s->cache_miss = NULL; + s->cache_missed = 0; s->d = d; s->recoverable = 1; s->write = (bio->bi_rw & REQ_WRITE) != 0; @@ -776,7 +778,7 @@ static void cached_dev_read_done_bh(stru struct cached_dev *dc = container_of(s->d, struct cached_dev, disk); bch_mark_cache_accounting(s->iop.c, s->d, - !s->cache_miss, s->iop.bypass); + !s->cache_missed, s->iop.bypass); trace_bcache_read(s->orig_bio, !s->cache_miss, s->iop.bypass); if (s->iop.error) @@ -795,6 +797,8 @@ static int cached_dev_cache_miss(struct struct cached_dev *dc = container_of(s->d, struct cached_dev, disk); struct bio *miss, *cache_bio; + s->cache_missed = 1; + if (s->cache_miss || s->iop.bypass) { miss = bio_next_split(bio, sectors, GFP_NOIO, s->d->bio_split); ret = miss == bio ? MAP_DONE : MAP_CONTINUE; Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from tang.junhui@zte.com.cn are queue-4.4/bcache-fix-wrong-cache_misses-statistics.patch