From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: fw@strlen.de, alexander.levin@verizon.com,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, pablo@netfilter.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "netfilter: bridge: honor frag_max_size when refragmenting" has been added to the 4.4-stable tree
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 14:54:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1513605273165220@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
netfilter: bridge: honor frag_max_size when refragmenting
to the 4.4-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
netfilter-bridge-honor-frag_max_size-when-refragmenting.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.4 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From foo@baz Mon Dec 18 14:47:43 CET 2017
From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2017 23:22:30 +0100
Subject: netfilter: bridge: honor frag_max_size when refragmenting
From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
[ Upstream commit 4ca60d08cbe65f501baad64af50fceba79c19fbb ]
consider a bridge with mtu 9000, but end host sending smaller
packets to another host with mtu < 9000.
In this case, after reassembly, bridge+defrag would refragment,
and then attempt to send the reassembled packet as long as it
was below 9k.
Instead we have to cap by the largest fragment size seen.
Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@verizon.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
net/bridge/br_netfilter_hooks.c | 12 +++++++-----
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
--- a/net/bridge/br_netfilter_hooks.c
+++ b/net/bridge/br_netfilter_hooks.c
@@ -701,18 +701,20 @@ static unsigned int nf_bridge_mtu_reduct
static int br_nf_dev_queue_xmit(struct net *net, struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
{
- struct nf_bridge_info *nf_bridge;
- unsigned int mtu_reserved;
+ struct nf_bridge_info *nf_bridge = nf_bridge_info_get(skb);
+ unsigned int mtu, mtu_reserved;
mtu_reserved = nf_bridge_mtu_reduction(skb);
+ mtu = skb->dev->mtu;
- if (skb_is_gso(skb) || skb->len + mtu_reserved <= skb->dev->mtu) {
+ if (nf_bridge->frag_max_size && nf_bridge->frag_max_size < mtu)
+ mtu = nf_bridge->frag_max_size;
+
+ if (skb_is_gso(skb) || skb->len + mtu_reserved <= mtu) {
nf_bridge_info_free(skb);
return br_dev_queue_push_xmit(net, sk, skb);
}
- nf_bridge = nf_bridge_info_get(skb);
-
/* This is wrong! We should preserve the original fragment
* boundaries by preserving frag_list rather than refragmenting.
*/
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from fw@strlen.de are
queue-4.4/netfilter-bridge-honor-frag_max_size-when-refragmenting.patch
reply other threads:[~2017-12-18 13:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1513605273165220@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=alexander.levin@verizon.com \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).