From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:33646 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758640AbdLROKY (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Dec 2017 09:10:24 -0500 Subject: Patch "xfs: fix log block underflow during recovery cycle verification" has been added to the 3.18-stable tree To: bfoster@redhat.com, alexander.levin@verizon.com, darrick.wong@oracle.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, zlang@redhat.com Cc: , From: Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 15:08:20 +0100 Message-ID: <15136061004090@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ANSI_X3.4-1968 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled xfs: fix log block underflow during recovery cycle verification to the 3.18-stable tree which can be found at: http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary The filename of the patch is: xfs-fix-log-block-underflow-during-recovery-cycle-verification.patch and it can be found in the queue-3.18 subdirectory. If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let know about it. >>From foo@baz Mon Dec 18 15:03:25 CET 2017 From: Brian Foster Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2017 09:31:16 -0700 Subject: xfs: fix log block underflow during recovery cycle verification From: Brian Foster [ Upstream commit 9f2a4505800607e537e9dd9dea4f55c4b0c30c7a ] It is possible for mkfs to format very small filesystems with too small of an internal log with respect to the various minimum size and block count requirements. If this occurs when the log happens to be smaller than the scan window used for cycle verification and the scan wraps the end of the log, the start_blk calculation in xlog_find_head() underflows and leads to an attempt to scan an invalid range of log blocks. This results in log recovery failure and a failed mount. Since there may be filesystems out in the wild with this kind of geometry, we cannot simply refuse to mount. Instead, cap the scan window for cycle verification to the size of the physical log. This ensures that the cycle verification proceeds as expected when the scan wraps the end of the log. Reported-by: Zorro Lang Signed-off-by: Brian Foster Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c @@ -740,7 +740,7 @@ xlog_find_head( * in the in-core log. The following number can be made tighter if * we actually look at the block size of the filesystem. */ - num_scan_bblks = XLOG_TOTAL_REC_SHIFT(log); + num_scan_bblks = min_t(int, log_bbnum, XLOG_TOTAL_REC_SHIFT(log)); if (head_blk >= num_scan_bblks) { /* * We are guaranteed that the entire check can be performed Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from bfoster@redhat.com are queue-3.18/xfs-fix-log-block-underflow-during-recovery-cycle-verification.patch