From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:35115 "EHLO mga01.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752716AbdLSX1c (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Dec 2017 18:27:32 -0500 Message-ID: <1513726051.27260.1.camel@intel.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH for-4.14.y 0/5] e1000e: Upstream fixes for linux-4.14.y From: Jeff Kirsher To: Benjamin Poirier , Greg KH Cc: Christian Hesse , Amit Pundir , Sasha Neftin , Stable Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 15:27:31 -0800 In-Reply-To: <20171219011012.ilvmd74fqplzhren@f1.synalogic.ca> References: <1511787217-10987-1-git-send-email-amit.pundir@linaro.org> <20171204164700.0600b925@leda> <20171204183722.GB13501@kroah.com> <20171205082327.629d5e78@leda> <20171205073545.GA15358@kroah.com> <20171211225810.2ed2b86b@leda> <20171218115949.GC10163@kroah.com> <20171219011012.ilvmd74fqplzhren@f1.synalogic.ca> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-LNcWagx34Idww8pFMbsT" Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: --=-LNcWagx34Idww8pFMbsT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 2017-12-19 at 10:10 +0900, Benjamin Poirier wrote: > On 2017/12/18 12:59, Greg KH wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 10:58:10PM +0100, Christian Hesse wrote: > > > Greg KH on Tue, 2017/12/05 08:35: > > > > On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 08:23:27AM +0100, Christian Hesse wrote: > > > > > Greg KH on Mon, 2017/12/04 19:37: = =20 > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 04:47:00PM +0100, Christian Hesse > > > > > > wrote: =20 > > > > > > > Amit Pundir on Mon, 2017/11/27 > > > > > > > 18:23: =20 > > > > > > > > Hi Greg, > > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > > Found few e100e upstream fixes from Benjamin Poirier in > > > > > > > > lede > > > > > > > > source tree, https://git.lede-project.org/?p=3Dsource.git, > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > these fixes seem reasonable enough for 4.14.y too. > > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > > Also submitting an e1000e buffer overrun fix by Sasha > > > > > > > > Neftin. > > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > > Cherry-picked and build tested for linux v4.14.2 for > > > > > > > > ARCH=3Darm/arm64. > > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > Amit Pundir > > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > > Benjamin Poirier (4): > > > > > > > > e1000e: Fix error path in link detection > > > > > > > > e1000e: Fix return value test > > > > > > > > e1000e: Separate signaling for link check/link up > > > > > > > > e1000e: Avoid receiver overrun interrupt bursts > > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > > Sasha Neftin (1): > > > > > > > > e1000e: fix buffer overrun while the I219 is processing > > > > > > > > DMA > > > > > > > > transactions =20 > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > Hello everybody, > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > looks like one of these breaks connectivity on my Thinkpad > > > > > > > X250. > > > > > > > Just downgraded to linux 4.14.2 to verify. =20 > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > Can you try the -rc release I just did? It has a fix for this > > > > > > series in > > > > > > it. =20 > > > > >=20 > > > > > It connects with the notebook's built in ethernet port (did not > > > > > check with > > > > > 4.14.3) but still fails to see a link when placed in docking > > > > > station. =20 > > > >=20 > > > > Do you have the same issues with 4.15-rc2? > > >=20 > > > Just a short heads-up and final result for this thread... > > > The issue is fixed with Benjamin's patch: > > >=20 > > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10104349/ > >=20 > > Any word on getting this patch into Linus's tree anytime soon? >=20 > Apparently the intel maintainer was unavailable recently: > https://www.mail-archive.com/netdev@vger.kernel.org/msg206192.html >=20 > The patch is now in there: > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jkirsher/next-queue.git/l > og/?h=3Ddev-queue > but that only makes it slated for 4.16 AFAIK. >=20 > Jeff, given that this issue breaks networking for many people, wouldn't > it be more appropriate to submit the patch for 4.15? Yeah, I will send to Dave's net tree (4.15) for inclusion. --=-LNcWagx34Idww8pFMbsT Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEiTyZWz+nnTrOJ1LZ5W/vlVpL7c4FAlo5oGMACgkQ5W/vlVpL 7c5puA//X0pJdO02DYjvWa4dls6doqSL5+4wQSEqbaQh5AETwqMsmpNpSY5BiW8I ie2Rh8Me0MlgdW2cerPudOGnBPHU1PeBCYpU93M6flVa3uhJy/7DhAfAiwxnRp7R kR1A1iqoAWtGBJDp8DIdsfIWNEpXTZV96JgAIM7tbHMcJwD5C4/Rm5r81tUuk42g Vare6r1VsrprsOGwT3D9ASBAx2uidMOGhz+VgHy0SGJH+PGdUrkkMvWSFj+d0SBh IsfCY9IT4vnn4DwIyTUxsmDb5j14CZjoHLglyr6gADrYA3gPNW3SKxwJgVop2NfP B3+CvCQaf0IE84zke0CzPl7cC9dHXoUJOD9APlVT+iDnniJnFqU5TUJgiUW19kcX z43Uesv3eSzlX6kkugBoz8fs3hA9T/h2o6fn/PNmMwQ40iScLpCOMAGe4ojr4DZl +yAUx1E3kAwJzExGFC9g2Ys5NHwA0ZATRJFcHjEKEY830u8JofapstSb4icJfEhn 0H+QN0EHKEZpJx/8nT9tyeL1ueYJjW64VcNphFAB1wzvYIVE97z+HQLf3dKUBDg8 GGcDDn5V/yR04f7Ujw845c+7BJoV4XJCA/PU4Umboe6uihhwR1eVyppKfuPfe9gX nZR5rJ4xyM5poLIV4Ka6pe/jhkOKRQwxp9HoSQYRZrf+j53WQ6o= =3xlf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-LNcWagx34Idww8pFMbsT--