From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:39058 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755983AbdLTRWx (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Dec 2017 12:22:53 -0500 Subject: Patch "cxl: Check if vphb exists before iterating over AFU devices" has been added to the 4.9-stable tree To: vaibhav@linux.vnet.ibm.com, andrew.donnellan@au1.ibm.com, fbarrat@linux.vnet.ibm.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au Cc: , From: Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2017 18:21:18 +0100 Message-ID: <1513790478164186@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ANSI_X3.4-1968 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled cxl: Check if vphb exists before iterating over AFU devices to the 4.9-stable tree which can be found at: http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary The filename of the patch is: cxl-check-if-vphb-exists-before-iterating-over-afu-devices.patch and it can be found in the queue-4.9 subdirectory. If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let know about it. >>From 12841f87b7a8ceb3d54f171660f72a86941bfcb3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Vaibhav Jain Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2017 09:08:57 +0530 Subject: cxl: Check if vphb exists before iterating over AFU devices From: Vaibhav Jain commit 12841f87b7a8ceb3d54f171660f72a86941bfcb3 upstream. During an eeh a kernel-oops is reported if no vPHB is allocated to the AFU. This happens as during AFU init, an error in creation of vPHB is a non-fatal error. Hence afu->phb should always be checked for NULL before iterating over it for the virtual AFU pci devices. This patch fixes the kenel-oops by adding a NULL pointer check for afu->phb before it is dereferenced. Fixes: 9e8df8a21963 ("cxl: EEH support") Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Jain Acked-by: Andrew Donnellan Acked-by: Frederic Barrat Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- drivers/misc/cxl/pci.c | 14 ++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+) --- a/drivers/misc/cxl/pci.c +++ b/drivers/misc/cxl/pci.c @@ -1758,6 +1758,9 @@ static pci_ers_result_t cxl_vphb_error_d /* There should only be one entry, but go through the list * anyway */ + if (afu->phb == NULL) + return result; + list_for_each_entry(afu_dev, &afu->phb->bus->devices, bus_list) { if (!afu_dev->driver) continue; @@ -1801,6 +1804,11 @@ static pci_ers_result_t cxl_pci_error_de /* Only participate in EEH if we are on a virtual PHB */ if (afu->phb == NULL) return PCI_ERS_RESULT_NONE; + + /* + * Tell the AFU drivers; but we don't care what they + * say, we're going away. + */ cxl_vphb_error_detected(afu, state); } return PCI_ERS_RESULT_DISCONNECT; @@ -1941,6 +1949,9 @@ static pci_ers_result_t cxl_pci_slot_res if (cxl_afu_select_best_mode(afu)) goto err; + if (afu->phb == NULL) + continue; + list_for_each_entry(afu_dev, &afu->phb->bus->devices, bus_list) { /* Reset the device context. * TODO: make this less disruptive @@ -2003,6 +2014,9 @@ static void cxl_pci_resume(struct pci_de for (i = 0; i < adapter->slices; i++) { afu = adapter->afu[i]; + if (afu->phb == NULL) + continue; + list_for_each_entry(afu_dev, &afu->phb->bus->devices, bus_list) { if (afu_dev->driver && afu_dev->driver->err_handler && afu_dev->driver->err_handler->resume) Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from vaibhav@linux.vnet.ibm.com are queue-4.9/cxl-check-if-vphb-exists-before-iterating-over-afu-devices.patch