From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: pablo@netfilter.org, alexander.levin@verizon.com,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, zlpnobody@gmail.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "netfilter: nfnl_cthelper: fix runtime expectation policy updates" has been added to the 3.18-stable tree
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2017 10:55:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1513850139164126@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
netfilter: nfnl_cthelper: fix runtime expectation policy updates
to the 3.18-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
netfilter-nfnl_cthelper-fix-runtime-expectation-policy-updates.patch
and it can be found in the queue-3.18 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From foo@baz Thu Dec 21 10:55:04 CET 2017
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 13:32:37 +0100
Subject: netfilter: nfnl_cthelper: fix runtime expectation policy updates
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
[ Upstream commit 2c422257550f123049552b39f7af6e3428a60f43 ]
We only allow runtime updates of expectation policies for timeout and
maximum number of expectations, otherwise reject the update.
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Acked-by: Liping Zhang <zlpnobody@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@verizon.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
net/netfilter/nfnetlink_cthelper.c | 86 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 84 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/net/netfilter/nfnetlink_cthelper.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nfnetlink_cthelper.c
@@ -256,6 +256,89 @@ err:
}
static int
+nfnl_cthelper_update_policy_one(const struct nf_conntrack_expect_policy *policy,
+ struct nf_conntrack_expect_policy *new_policy,
+ const struct nlattr *attr)
+{
+ struct nlattr *tb[NFCTH_POLICY_MAX + 1];
+ int err;
+
+ err = nla_parse_nested(tb, NFCTH_POLICY_MAX, attr,
+ nfnl_cthelper_expect_pol);
+ if (err < 0)
+ return err;
+
+ if (!tb[NFCTH_POLICY_NAME] ||
+ !tb[NFCTH_POLICY_EXPECT_MAX] ||
+ !tb[NFCTH_POLICY_EXPECT_TIMEOUT])
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ if (nla_strcmp(tb[NFCTH_POLICY_NAME], policy->name))
+ return -EBUSY;
+
+ new_policy->max_expected =
+ ntohl(nla_get_be32(tb[NFCTH_POLICY_EXPECT_MAX]));
+ new_policy->timeout =
+ ntohl(nla_get_be32(tb[NFCTH_POLICY_EXPECT_TIMEOUT]));
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int nfnl_cthelper_update_policy_all(struct nlattr *tb[],
+ struct nf_conntrack_helper *helper)
+{
+ struct nf_conntrack_expect_policy new_policy[helper->expect_class_max + 1];
+ struct nf_conntrack_expect_policy *policy;
+ int i, err;
+
+ /* Check first that all policy attributes are well-formed, so we don't
+ * leave things in inconsistent state on errors.
+ */
+ for (i = 0; i < helper->expect_class_max + 1; i++) {
+
+ if (!tb[NFCTH_POLICY_SET + i])
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ err = nfnl_cthelper_update_policy_one(&helper->expect_policy[i],
+ &new_policy[i],
+ tb[NFCTH_POLICY_SET + i]);
+ if (err < 0)
+ return err;
+ }
+ /* Now we can safely update them. */
+ for (i = 0; i < helper->expect_class_max + 1; i++) {
+ policy = (struct nf_conntrack_expect_policy *)
+ &helper->expect_policy[i];
+ policy->max_expected = new_policy->max_expected;
+ policy->timeout = new_policy->timeout;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int nfnl_cthelper_update_policy(struct nf_conntrack_helper *helper,
+ const struct nlattr *attr)
+{
+ struct nlattr *tb[NFCTH_POLICY_SET_MAX + 1];
+ unsigned int class_max;
+ int err;
+
+ err = nla_parse_nested(tb, NFCTH_POLICY_SET_MAX, attr,
+ nfnl_cthelper_expect_policy_set);
+ if (err < 0)
+ return err;
+
+ if (!tb[NFCTH_POLICY_SET_NUM])
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ class_max = ntohl(nla_get_be32(tb[NFCTH_POLICY_SET_NUM]));
+ if (helper->expect_class_max + 1 != class_max)
+ return -EBUSY;
+
+ return nfnl_cthelper_update_policy_all(tb, helper);
+}
+
+static int
nfnl_cthelper_update(const struct nlattr * const tb[],
struct nf_conntrack_helper *helper)
{
@@ -265,8 +348,7 @@ nfnl_cthelper_update(const struct nlattr
return -EBUSY;
if (tb[NFCTH_POLICY]) {
- ret = nfnl_cthelper_parse_expect_policy(helper,
- tb[NFCTH_POLICY]);
+ ret = nfnl_cthelper_update_policy(helper, tb[NFCTH_POLICY]);
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
}
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from pablo@netfilter.org are
queue-3.18/netfilter-nfnl_cthelper-fix-runtime-expectation-policy-updates.patch
queue-3.18/netfilter-nfnl_cthelper-fix-a-race-when-walk-the-nf_ct_helper_hash-table.patch
queue-3.18/netfilter-nfnl_cthelper-fix-memory-leak.patch
queue-3.18/netfilter-nf_nat_snmp-fix-panic-when-snmp_trap_helper-fails-to-register.patch
reply other threads:[~2017-12-21 9:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1513850139164126@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=alexander.levin@verizon.com \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zlpnobody@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).