stable.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: daniel@iogearbox.net, ast@kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
	holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "[PATCH stable/4.14 03/14] bpf, s390x: do not reload skb pointers in non-skb context" has been added to the 4.14-stable tree
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2017 16:47:48 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <151395766820657@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171222152312.2945-4-daniel@iogearbox.net>


This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    [PATCH stable/4.14 03/14] bpf, s390x: do not reload skb pointers in non-skb context

to the 4.14-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     bpf-s390x-do-not-reload-skb-pointers-in-non-skb-context.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.14 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.


>From foo@baz Fri Dec 22 16:47:02 CET 2017
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2017 16:23:01 +0100
Subject: [PATCH stable/4.14 03/14] bpf, s390x: do not reload skb pointers in non-skb context
To: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, jannh@google.com, stable@vger.kernel.org, Michael Holzheu <holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Message-ID: <20171222152312.2945-4-daniel@iogearbox.net>

From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>


[ Upstream commit 6d59b7dbf72ed20d0138e2f9b75ca3d4a9d4faca ]

The assumption of unconditionally reloading skb pointers on
BPF helper calls where bpf_helper_changes_pkt_data() holds
true is wrong. There can be different contexts where the
BPF helper would enforce a reload such as in case of XDP.
Here, we do have a struct xdp_buff instead of struct sk_buff
as context, thus this will access garbage.

JITs only ever need to deal with cached skb pointer reload
when ld_abs/ind was seen, therefore guard the reload behind
SEEN_SKB only. Tested on s390x.

Fixes: 9db7f2b81880 ("s390/bpf: recache skb->data/hlen for skb_vlan_push/pop")
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Cc: Michael Holzheu <holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c |   11 +++++------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
+++ b/arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
@@ -55,8 +55,7 @@ struct bpf_jit {
 #define SEEN_LITERAL	8	/* code uses literals */
 #define SEEN_FUNC	16	/* calls C functions */
 #define SEEN_TAIL_CALL	32	/* code uses tail calls */
-#define SEEN_SKB_CHANGE	64	/* code changes skb data */
-#define SEEN_REG_AX	128	/* code uses constant blinding */
+#define SEEN_REG_AX	64	/* code uses constant blinding */
 #define SEEN_STACK	(SEEN_FUNC | SEEN_MEM | SEEN_SKB)
 
 /*
@@ -448,12 +447,12 @@ static void bpf_jit_prologue(struct bpf_
 			EMIT6_DISP_LH(0xe3000000, 0x0024, REG_W1, REG_0,
 				      REG_15, 152);
 	}
-	if (jit->seen & SEEN_SKB)
+	if (jit->seen & SEEN_SKB) {
 		emit_load_skb_data_hlen(jit);
-	if (jit->seen & SEEN_SKB_CHANGE)
 		/* stg %b1,ST_OFF_SKBP(%r0,%r15) */
 		EMIT6_DISP_LH(0xe3000000, 0x0024, BPF_REG_1, REG_0, REG_15,
 			      STK_OFF_SKBP);
+	}
 }
 
 /*
@@ -983,8 +982,8 @@ static noinline int bpf_jit_insn(struct
 		EMIT2(0x0d00, REG_14, REG_W1);
 		/* lgr %b0,%r2: load return value into %b0 */
 		EMIT4(0xb9040000, BPF_REG_0, REG_2);
-		if (bpf_helper_changes_pkt_data((void *)func)) {
-			jit->seen |= SEEN_SKB_CHANGE;
+		if ((jit->seen & SEEN_SKB) &&
+		    bpf_helper_changes_pkt_data((void *)func)) {
 			/* lg %b1,ST_OFF_SKBP(%r15) */
 			EMIT6_DISP_LH(0xe3000000, 0x0004, BPF_REG_1, REG_0,
 				      REG_15, STK_OFF_SKBP);


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from daniel@iogearbox.net are

queue-4.14/bpf-fix-integer-overflows.patch
queue-4.14/bpf-fix-branch-pruning-logic.patch
queue-4.14/bpf-s390x-do-not-reload-skb-pointers-in-non-skb-context.patch
queue-4.14/bpf-sparc-fix-usage-of-wrong-reg-for-load_skb_regs-after-call.patch
queue-4.14/bpf-fix-incorrect-tracking-of-register-size-truncation.patch
queue-4.14/bpf-don-t-prune-branches-when-a-scalar-is-replaced-with-a-pointer.patch
queue-4.14/bpf-verifier-fix-bounds-calculation-on-bpf_rsh.patch
queue-4.14/selftests-bpf-add-tests-for-recent-bugfixes.patch
queue-4.14/bpf-fix-corruption-on-concurrent-perf_event_output-calls.patch
queue-4.14/bpf-fix-incorrect-sign-extension-in-check_alu_op.patch
queue-4.14/bpf-ppc64-do-not-reload-skb-pointers-in-non-skb-context.patch
queue-4.14/bpf-fix-missing-error-return-in-check_stack_boundary.patch
queue-4.14/bpf-force-strict-alignment-checks-for-stack-pointers.patch
queue-4.14/bpf-fix-32-bit-alu-op-verification.patch
queue-4.14/bpf-fix-build-issues-on-um-due-to-mising-bpf_perf_event.h.patch

  reply	other threads:[~2017-12-22 15:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-12-22 15:22 [PATCH stable/4.14 00/14] BPF stable patches for 4.14 Daniel Borkmann
2017-12-22 15:22 ` [PATCH stable/4.14 01/14] bpf: fix branch pruning logic Daniel Borkmann
2017-12-22 15:47   ` Patch "[PATCH stable/4.14 01/14] bpf: fix branch pruning logic" has been added to the 4.14-stable tree gregkh
2017-12-22 15:23 ` [PATCH stable/4.14 02/14] bpf: fix corruption on concurrent perf_event_output calls Daniel Borkmann
2017-12-22 15:47   ` Patch "[PATCH stable/4.14 02/14] bpf: fix corruption on concurrent perf_event_output calls" has been added to the 4.14-stable tree gregkh
2017-12-22 15:23 ` [PATCH stable/4.14 03/14] bpf, s390x: do not reload skb pointers in non-skb context Daniel Borkmann
2017-12-22 15:47   ` gregkh [this message]
2017-12-22 15:23 ` [PATCH stable/4.14 04/14] bpf, ppc64: " Daniel Borkmann
2017-12-22 15:47   ` Patch "[PATCH stable/4.14 04/14] bpf, ppc64: do not reload skb pointers in non-skb context" has been added to the 4.14-stable tree gregkh
2017-12-22 15:23 ` [PATCH stable/4.14 05/14] bpf, sparc: fix usage of wrong reg for load_skb_regs after call Daniel Borkmann
2017-12-22 15:47   ` Patch "[PATCH stable/4.14 05/14] bpf, sparc: fix usage of wrong reg for load_skb_regs after call" has been added to the 4.14-stable tree gregkh
2017-12-22 15:23 ` [PATCH stable/4.14 06/14] bpf/verifier: fix bounds calculation on BPF_RSH Daniel Borkmann
2017-12-22 15:47   ` Patch "[PATCH stable/4.14 06/14] bpf/verifier: fix bounds calculation on BPF_RSH" has been added to the 4.14-stable tree gregkh
2017-12-22 15:23 ` [PATCH stable/4.14 07/14] bpf: fix incorrect sign extension in check_alu_op() Daniel Borkmann
2017-12-22 15:47   ` Patch "[PATCH stable/4.14 07/14] bpf: fix incorrect sign extension in check_alu_op()" has been added to the 4.14-stable tree gregkh
2017-12-22 15:23 ` [PATCH stable/4.14 08/14] bpf: fix incorrect tracking of register size truncation Daniel Borkmann
2017-12-22 15:47   ` Patch "[PATCH stable/4.14 08/14] bpf: fix incorrect tracking of register size truncation" has been added to the 4.14-stable tree gregkh
2017-12-22 15:23 ` [PATCH stable/4.14 09/14] bpf: fix 32-bit ALU op verification Daniel Borkmann
2017-12-22 15:47   ` Patch "[PATCH stable/4.14 09/14] bpf: fix 32-bit ALU op verification" has been added to the 4.14-stable tree gregkh
2017-12-22 15:23 ` [PATCH stable/4.14 10/14] bpf: fix missing error return in check_stack_boundary() Daniel Borkmann
2017-12-22 15:47   ` Patch "[PATCH stable/4.14 10/14] bpf: fix missing error return in check_stack_boundary()" has been added to the 4.14-stable tree gregkh
2017-12-22 15:23 ` [PATCH stable/4.14 11/14] bpf: force strict alignment checks for stack pointers Daniel Borkmann
2017-12-22 15:47   ` Patch "[PATCH stable/4.14 11/14] bpf: force strict alignment checks for stack pointers" has been added to the 4.14-stable tree gregkh
2017-12-22 15:23 ` [PATCH stable/4.14 12/14] bpf: don't prune branches when a scalar is replaced with a pointer Daniel Borkmann
2017-12-22 15:47   ` Patch "[PATCH stable/4.14 12/14] bpf: don't prune branches when a scalar is replaced with a pointer" has been added to the 4.14-stable tree gregkh
2017-12-22 15:23 ` [PATCH stable/4.14 13/14] bpf: fix integer overflows Daniel Borkmann
2017-12-22 15:47   ` Patch "[PATCH stable/4.14 13/14] bpf: fix integer overflows" has been added to the 4.14-stable tree gregkh
2017-12-22 15:23 ` [PATCH stable/4.14 14/14] selftests/bpf: add tests for recent bugfixes Daniel Borkmann
2017-12-22 15:47   ` Patch "[PATCH stable/4.14 14/14] selftests/bpf: add tests for recent bugfixes" has been added to the 4.14-stable tree gregkh
2017-12-22 15:45 ` [PATCH stable/4.14 00/14] BPF stable patches for 4.14 Greg KH
2017-12-22 15:48   ` Greg KH
2017-12-22 15:51 ` Greg KH

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=151395766820657@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).