From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: jwi@linux.vnet.ibm.com, davem@davemloft.net, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "s390/qeth: update takeover IPs after configuration change" has been added to the 4.9-stable tree
Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2017 11:16:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1514715363175135@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
s390/qeth: update takeover IPs after configuration change
to the 4.9-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
s390-qeth-update-takeover-ips-after-configuration-change.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.9 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From foo@baz Sun Dec 31 11:13:15 CET 2017
From: Julian Wiedmann <jwi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2017 18:56:32 +0100
Subject: s390/qeth: update takeover IPs after configuration change
From: Julian Wiedmann <jwi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
[ Upstream commit 02f510f326501470348a5df341e8232c3497bbbb ]
Any modification to the takeover IP-ranges requires that we re-evaluate
which IP addresses are takeover-eligible. Otherwise we might do takeover
for some addresses when we no longer should, or vice-versa.
Signed-off-by: Julian Wiedmann <jwi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/s390/net/qeth_core.h | 4 +-
drivers/s390/net/qeth_core_main.c | 4 +-
drivers/s390/net/qeth_l3.h | 2 -
drivers/s390/net/qeth_l3_main.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++--
drivers/s390/net/qeth_l3_sys.c | 63 ++++++++++++++++++++------------------
5 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/s390/net/qeth_core.h
+++ b/drivers/s390/net/qeth_core.h
@@ -577,8 +577,8 @@ enum qeth_cq {
struct qeth_ipato {
bool enabled;
- int invert4;
- int invert6;
+ bool invert4;
+ bool invert6;
struct list_head entries;
};
--- a/drivers/s390/net/qeth_core_main.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/net/qeth_core_main.c
@@ -1476,8 +1476,8 @@ static int qeth_setup_card(struct qeth_c
/* IP address takeover */
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&card->ipato.entries);
card->ipato.enabled = false;
- card->ipato.invert4 = 0;
- card->ipato.invert6 = 0;
+ card->ipato.invert4 = false;
+ card->ipato.invert6 = false;
/* init QDIO stuff */
qeth_init_qdio_info(card);
INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&card->buffer_reclaim_work, qeth_buffer_reclaim_work);
--- a/drivers/s390/net/qeth_l3.h
+++ b/drivers/s390/net/qeth_l3.h
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ void qeth_l3_del_vipa(struct qeth_card *
int qeth_l3_add_rxip(struct qeth_card *, enum qeth_prot_versions, const u8 *);
void qeth_l3_del_rxip(struct qeth_card *card, enum qeth_prot_versions,
const u8 *);
-int qeth_l3_is_addr_covered_by_ipato(struct qeth_card *, struct qeth_ipaddr *);
+void qeth_l3_update_ipato(struct qeth_card *card);
struct qeth_ipaddr *qeth_l3_get_addr_buffer(enum qeth_prot_versions);
int qeth_l3_add_ip(struct qeth_card *, struct qeth_ipaddr *);
int qeth_l3_delete_ip(struct qeth_card *, struct qeth_ipaddr *);
--- a/drivers/s390/net/qeth_l3_main.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/net/qeth_l3_main.c
@@ -168,8 +168,8 @@ static void qeth_l3_convert_addr_to_bits
}
}
-int qeth_l3_is_addr_covered_by_ipato(struct qeth_card *card,
- struct qeth_ipaddr *addr)
+static bool qeth_l3_is_addr_covered_by_ipato(struct qeth_card *card,
+ struct qeth_ipaddr *addr)
{
struct qeth_ipato_entry *ipatoe;
u8 addr_bits[128] = {0, };
@@ -608,6 +608,27 @@ int qeth_l3_setrouting_v6(struct qeth_ca
/*
* IP address takeover related functions
*/
+
+/**
+ * qeth_l3_update_ipato() - Update 'takeover' property, for all NORMAL IPs.
+ *
+ * Caller must hold ip_lock.
+ */
+void qeth_l3_update_ipato(struct qeth_card *card)
+{
+ struct qeth_ipaddr *addr;
+ unsigned int i;
+
+ hash_for_each(card->ip_htable, i, addr, hnode) {
+ if (addr->type != QETH_IP_TYPE_NORMAL)
+ continue;
+ if (qeth_l3_is_addr_covered_by_ipato(card, addr))
+ addr->set_flags |= QETH_IPA_SETIP_TAKEOVER_FLAG;
+ else
+ addr->set_flags &= ~QETH_IPA_SETIP_TAKEOVER_FLAG;
+ }
+}
+
static void qeth_l3_clear_ipato_list(struct qeth_card *card)
{
struct qeth_ipato_entry *ipatoe, *tmp;
@@ -619,6 +640,7 @@ static void qeth_l3_clear_ipato_list(str
kfree(ipatoe);
}
+ qeth_l3_update_ipato(card);
spin_unlock_bh(&card->ip_lock);
}
@@ -643,8 +665,10 @@ int qeth_l3_add_ipato_entry(struct qeth_
}
}
- if (!rc)
+ if (!rc) {
list_add_tail(&new->entry, &card->ipato.entries);
+ qeth_l3_update_ipato(card);
+ }
spin_unlock_bh(&card->ip_lock);
@@ -667,6 +691,7 @@ void qeth_l3_del_ipato_entry(struct qeth
(proto == QETH_PROT_IPV4)? 4:16) &&
(ipatoe->mask_bits == mask_bits)) {
list_del(&ipatoe->entry);
+ qeth_l3_update_ipato(card);
kfree(ipatoe);
}
}
--- a/drivers/s390/net/qeth_l3_sys.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/net/qeth_l3_sys.c
@@ -372,9 +372,8 @@ static ssize_t qeth_l3_dev_ipato_enable_
struct device_attribute *attr, const char *buf, size_t count)
{
struct qeth_card *card = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
- struct qeth_ipaddr *addr;
- int i, rc = 0;
bool enable;
+ int rc = 0;
if (!card)
return -EINVAL;
@@ -393,20 +392,12 @@ static ssize_t qeth_l3_dev_ipato_enable_
goto out;
}
- if (card->ipato.enabled == enable)
- goto out;
- card->ipato.enabled = enable;
-
- spin_lock_bh(&card->ip_lock);
- hash_for_each(card->ip_htable, i, addr, hnode) {
- if (addr->type != QETH_IP_TYPE_NORMAL)
- continue;
- if (!enable)
- addr->set_flags &= ~QETH_IPA_SETIP_TAKEOVER_FLAG;
- else if (qeth_l3_is_addr_covered_by_ipato(card, addr))
- addr->set_flags |= QETH_IPA_SETIP_TAKEOVER_FLAG;
+ if (card->ipato.enabled != enable) {
+ card->ipato.enabled = enable;
+ spin_lock_bh(&card->ip_lock);
+ qeth_l3_update_ipato(card);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&card->ip_lock);
}
- spin_unlock_bh(&card->ip_lock);
out:
mutex_unlock(&card->conf_mutex);
return rc ? rc : count;
@@ -432,20 +423,27 @@ static ssize_t qeth_l3_dev_ipato_invert4
const char *buf, size_t count)
{
struct qeth_card *card = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+ bool invert;
int rc = 0;
if (!card)
return -EINVAL;
mutex_lock(&card->conf_mutex);
- if (sysfs_streq(buf, "toggle"))
- card->ipato.invert4 = (card->ipato.invert4)? 0 : 1;
- else if (sysfs_streq(buf, "1"))
- card->ipato.invert4 = 1;
- else if (sysfs_streq(buf, "0"))
- card->ipato.invert4 = 0;
- else
+ if (sysfs_streq(buf, "toggle")) {
+ invert = !card->ipato.invert4;
+ } else if (kstrtobool(buf, &invert)) {
rc = -EINVAL;
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ if (card->ipato.invert4 != invert) {
+ card->ipato.invert4 = invert;
+ spin_lock_bh(&card->ip_lock);
+ qeth_l3_update_ipato(card);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&card->ip_lock);
+ }
+out:
mutex_unlock(&card->conf_mutex);
return rc ? rc : count;
}
@@ -611,20 +609,27 @@ static ssize_t qeth_l3_dev_ipato_invert6
struct device_attribute *attr, const char *buf, size_t count)
{
struct qeth_card *card = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+ bool invert;
int rc = 0;
if (!card)
return -EINVAL;
mutex_lock(&card->conf_mutex);
- if (sysfs_streq(buf, "toggle"))
- card->ipato.invert6 = (card->ipato.invert6)? 0 : 1;
- else if (sysfs_streq(buf, "1"))
- card->ipato.invert6 = 1;
- else if (sysfs_streq(buf, "0"))
- card->ipato.invert6 = 0;
- else
+ if (sysfs_streq(buf, "toggle")) {
+ invert = !card->ipato.invert6;
+ } else if (kstrtobool(buf, &invert)) {
rc = -EINVAL;
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ if (card->ipato.invert6 != invert) {
+ card->ipato.invert6 = invert;
+ spin_lock_bh(&card->ip_lock);
+ qeth_l3_update_ipato(card);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&card->ip_lock);
+ }
+out:
mutex_unlock(&card->conf_mutex);
return rc ? rc : count;
}
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from jwi@linux.vnet.ibm.com are
queue-4.9/s390-qeth-lock-ip-table-while-applying-takeover-changes.patch
queue-4.9/s390-qeth-apply-takeover-changes-when-mode-is-toggled.patch
queue-4.9/s390-qeth-update-takeover-ips-after-configuration-change.patch
queue-4.9/s390-qeth-don-t-apply-takeover-changes-to-rxip.patch
reply other threads:[~2017-12-31 10:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1514715363175135@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jwi@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).