From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: x86 <x86@kernel.org>, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Anton Blanchard <anton@ozlabs.org>,
stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] membarrier: Explicitly sync remote cores when SYNC_CORE is requested
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2020 14:43:32 -0500 (EST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1515215436.71.1606938212130.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6d4c8ff7300c72fd4d44ee5755bd149359f2661a.1606923183.git.luto@kernel.org>
----- On Dec 2, 2020, at 10:35 AM, Andy Lutomirski luto@kernel.org wrote:
> membarrier() does not explicitly sync_core() remote CPUs; instead, it
> relies on the assumption that an IPI will result in a core sync. On
> x86, I think this may be true in practice, but it's not architecturally
> reliable. In particular, the SDM and APM do not appear to guarantee
> that interrupt delivery is serializing. While IRET does serialize, IPI
> return can schedule, thereby switching to another task in the same mm
> that was sleeping in a syscall. The new task could then SYSRET back to
> usermode without ever executing IRET.
>
> Make this more robust by explicitly calling sync_core_before_usermode()
> on remote cores. (This also helps people who search the kernel tree for
> instances of sync_core() and sync_core_before_usermode() -- one might be
> surprised that the core membarrier code doesn't currently show up in a
> such a search.)
>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
> ---
> kernel/sched/membarrier.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/membarrier.c b/kernel/sched/membarrier.c
> index 6251d3d12abe..01538b31f27e 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/membarrier.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/membarrier.c
> @@ -166,6 +166,23 @@ static void ipi_mb(void *info)
> smp_mb(); /* IPIs should be serializing but paranoid. */
> }
>
> +static void ipi_sync_core(void *info)
> +{
> + /*
> + * The smp_mb() in membarrier after all the IPIs is supposed to
> + * ensure that memory on remote CPUs that occur before the IPI
> + * become visible to membarrier()'s caller -- see scenario B in
> + * the big comment at the top of this file.
> + *
> + * A sync_core() would provide this guarantee, but
> + * sync_core_before_usermode() might end up being deferred until
> + * after membarrier()'s smp_mb().
> + */
> + smp_mb(); /* IPIs should be serializing but paranoid. */
> +
> + sync_core_before_usermode();
> +}
> +
> static void ipi_rseq(void *info)
> {
> /*
> @@ -301,6 +318,7 @@ static int membarrier_private_expedited(int flags, int
> cpu_id)
> if (!(atomic_read(&mm->membarrier_state) &
> MEMBARRIER_STATE_PRIVATE_EXPEDITED_SYNC_CORE_READY))
> return -EPERM;
> + ipi_func = ipi_sync_core;
> } else if (flags == MEMBARRIER_FLAG_RSEQ) {
> if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RSEQ))
> return -EINVAL;
> --
> 2.28.0
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-02 19:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <cover.1606923183.git.luto@kernel.org>
2020-12-02 15:35 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] x86/membarrier: Get rid of a dubious optimization Andy Lutomirski
2020-12-02 15:35 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] membarrier: Add an actual barrier before rseq_preempt() Andy Lutomirski
2020-12-02 19:40 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2020-12-02 15:35 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] membarrier: Explicitly sync remote cores when SYNC_CORE is requested Andy Lutomirski
2020-12-02 19:43 ` Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]
2020-12-02 15:35 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] membarrier: Execute SYNC_CORE on the calling thread Andy Lutomirski
2020-12-02 19:39 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1515215436.71.1606938212130.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com \
--to=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=anton@ozlabs.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).