From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com, dvhart@infradead.org,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com,
noodles@earth.li
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "platform/x86: wmi: Call acpi_wmi_init() later" has been added to the 4.14-stable tree
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 13:19:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <151558675813464@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
platform/x86: wmi: Call acpi_wmi_init() later
to the 4.14-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
platform-x86-wmi-call-acpi_wmi_init-later.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.14 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From 98b8e4e5c17bf87c1b18ed929472051dab39878c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2018 12:49:29 +0100
Subject: platform/x86: wmi: Call acpi_wmi_init() later
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
commit 98b8e4e5c17bf87c1b18ed929472051dab39878c upstream.
Calling acpi_wmi_init() at the subsys_initcall() level causes ordering
issues to appear on some systems and they are difficult to reproduce,
because there is no guaranteed ordering between subsys_initcall()
calls, so they may occur in different orders on different systems.
In particular, commit 86d9f48534e8 (mm/slab: fix kmemcg cache
creation delayed issue) exposed one of these issues where genl_init()
and acpi_wmi_init() are both called at the same initcall level, but
the former must run before the latter so as to avoid a NULL pointer
dereference.
For this reason, move the acpi_wmi_init() invocation to the
initcall_sync level which should still be early enough for things
to work correctly in the WMI land.
Link: https://marc.info/?t=151274596700002&r=1&w=2
Reported-by: Jonathan McDowell <noodles@earth.li>
Reported-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Tested-by: Jonathan McDowell <noodles@earth.li>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Darren Hart (VMware) <dvhart@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/platform/x86/wmi.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/wmi.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/wmi.c
@@ -1268,5 +1268,5 @@ static void __exit acpi_wmi_exit(void)
bus_unregister(&wmi_bus_type);
}
-subsys_initcall(acpi_wmi_init);
+subsys_initcall_sync(acpi_wmi_init);
module_exit(acpi_wmi_exit);
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com are
queue-4.14/platform-x86-wmi-call-acpi_wmi_init-later.patch
reply other threads:[~2018-01-10 12:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=151558675813464@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=dvhart@infradead.org \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=noodles@earth.li \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).