public inbox for stable@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "ARM: net: bpf: fix LDX instructions" has been added to the 4.14-stable tree
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2018 11:36:32 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <151696299278229@kroah.com> (raw)


This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    ARM: net: bpf: fix LDX instructions

to the 4.14-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     arm-net-bpf-fix-ldx-instructions.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.14 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.


>From ec19e02b343db991d2d1610c409efefebf4e2ca9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2018 21:06:16 +0000
Subject: ARM: net: bpf: fix LDX instructions

From: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>

commit ec19e02b343db991d2d1610c409efefebf4e2ca9 upstream.

When the source and destination register are identical, our JIT does not
generate correct code, which leads to kernel oopses.

Fix this by (a) generating more efficient code, and (b) making use of
the temporary earlier if we will overwrite the address register.

Fixes: 39c13c204bb1 ("arm: eBPF JIT compiler")
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c |   61 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c
+++ b/arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c
@@ -913,33 +913,53 @@ static inline void emit_str_r(const u8 d
 }
 
 /* dst = *(size*)(src + off) */
-static inline void emit_ldx_r(const u8 dst, const u8 src, bool dstk,
-			      const s32 off, struct jit_ctx *ctx, const u8 sz){
+static inline void emit_ldx_r(const u8 dst[], const u8 src, bool dstk,
+			      s32 off, struct jit_ctx *ctx, const u8 sz){
 	const u8 *tmp = bpf2a32[TMP_REG_1];
-	u8 rd = dstk ? tmp[1] : dst;
+	const u8 *rd = dstk ? tmp : dst;
 	u8 rm = src;
+	s32 off_max;
 
-	if (off) {
+	if (sz == BPF_H)
+		off_max = 0xff;
+	else
+		off_max = 0xfff;
+
+	if (off < 0 || off > off_max) {
 		emit_a32_mov_i(tmp[0], off, false, ctx);
 		emit(ARM_ADD_R(tmp[0], tmp[0], src), ctx);
 		rm = tmp[0];
+		off = 0;
+	} else if (rd[1] == rm) {
+		emit(ARM_MOV_R(tmp[0], rm), ctx);
+		rm = tmp[0];
 	}
 	switch (sz) {
-	case BPF_W:
-		/* Load a Word */
-		emit(ARM_LDR_I(rd, rm, 0), ctx);
+	case BPF_B:
+		/* Load a Byte */
+		emit(ARM_LDRB_I(rd[1], rm, off), ctx);
+		emit_a32_mov_i(dst[0], 0, dstk, ctx);
 		break;
 	case BPF_H:
 		/* Load a HalfWord */
-		emit(ARM_LDRH_I(rd, rm, 0), ctx);
+		emit(ARM_LDRH_I(rd[1], rm, off), ctx);
+		emit_a32_mov_i(dst[0], 0, dstk, ctx);
 		break;
-	case BPF_B:
-		/* Load a Byte */
-		emit(ARM_LDRB_I(rd, rm, 0), ctx);
+	case BPF_W:
+		/* Load a Word */
+		emit(ARM_LDR_I(rd[1], rm, off), ctx);
+		emit_a32_mov_i(dst[0], 0, dstk, ctx);
+		break;
+	case BPF_DW:
+		/* Load a Double Word */
+		emit(ARM_LDR_I(rd[1], rm, off), ctx);
+		emit(ARM_LDR_I(rd[0], rm, off + 4), ctx);
 		break;
 	}
 	if (dstk)
-		emit(ARM_STR_I(rd, ARM_SP, STACK_VAR(dst)), ctx);
+		emit(ARM_STR_I(rd[1], ARM_SP, STACK_VAR(dst[1])), ctx);
+	if (dstk && sz == BPF_DW)
+		emit(ARM_STR_I(rd[0], ARM_SP, STACK_VAR(dst[0])), ctx);
 }
 
 /* Arithmatic Operation */
@@ -1440,22 +1460,7 @@ exit:
 		rn = sstk ? tmp2[1] : src_lo;
 		if (sstk)
 			emit(ARM_LDR_I(rn, ARM_SP, STACK_VAR(src_lo)), ctx);
-		switch (BPF_SIZE(code)) {
-		case BPF_W:
-			/* Load a Word */
-		case BPF_H:
-			/* Load a Half-Word */
-		case BPF_B:
-			/* Load a Byte */
-			emit_ldx_r(dst_lo, rn, dstk, off, ctx, BPF_SIZE(code));
-			emit_a32_mov_i(dst_hi, 0, dstk, ctx);
-			break;
-		case BPF_DW:
-			/* Load a double word */
-			emit_ldx_r(dst_lo, rn, dstk, off, ctx, BPF_W);
-			emit_ldx_r(dst_hi, rn, dstk, off+4, ctx, BPF_W);
-			break;
-		}
+		emit_ldx_r(dst, rn, dstk, off, ctx, BPF_SIZE(code));
 		break;
 	/* R0 = ntohx(*(size *)(((struct sk_buff *)R6)->data + imm)) */
 	case BPF_LD | BPF_ABS | BPF_W:


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk are

queue-4.14/arm-net-bpf-fix-stack-alignment.patch
queue-4.14/arm-net-bpf-fix-ldx-instructions.patch
queue-4.14/arm-net-bpf-fix-register-saving.patch
queue-4.14/arm-net-bpf-move-stack-documentation.patch
queue-4.14/arm-net-bpf-correct-stack-layout-documentation.patch
queue-4.14/arm-net-bpf-clarify-tail_call-index.patch
queue-4.14/arm-net-bpf-avoid-bx-instruction-on-non-thumb-capable-cpus.patch
queue-4.14/arm-net-bpf-fix-tail-call-jumps.patch

                 reply	other threads:[~2018-01-26 10:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=151696299278229@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox