public inbox for stable@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "ARM: net: bpf: fix tail call jumps" has been added to the 4.14-stable tree
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2018 11:36:36 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <151696299618154@kroah.com> (raw)


This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    ARM: net: bpf: fix tail call jumps

to the 4.14-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     arm-net-bpf-fix-tail-call-jumps.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.14 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.


>From f4483f2cc1fdc03488c8a1452e545545ae5bda93 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2018 11:39:54 +0000
Subject: ARM: net: bpf: fix tail call jumps

From: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>

commit f4483f2cc1fdc03488c8a1452e545545ae5bda93 upstream.

When a tail call fails, it is documented that the tail call should
continue execution at the following instruction.  An example tail call
sequence is:

  12: (85) call bpf_tail_call#12
  13: (b7) r0 = 0
  14: (95) exit

The ARM assembler for the tail call in this case ends up branching to
instruction 14 instead of instruction 13, resulting in the BPF filter
returning a non-zero value:

  178:	ldr	r8, [sp, #588]	; insn 12
  17c:	ldr	r6, [r8, r6]
  180:	ldr	r8, [sp, #580]
  184:	cmp	r8, r6
  188:	bcs	0x1e8
  18c:	ldr	r6, [sp, #524]
  190:	ldr	r7, [sp, #528]
  194:	cmp	r7, #0
  198:	cmpeq	r6, #32
  19c:	bhi	0x1e8
  1a0:	adds	r6, r6, #1
  1a4:	adc	r7, r7, #0
  1a8:	str	r6, [sp, #524]
  1ac:	str	r7, [sp, #528]
  1b0:	mov	r6, #104
  1b4:	ldr	r8, [sp, #588]
  1b8:	add	r6, r8, r6
  1bc:	ldr	r8, [sp, #580]
  1c0:	lsl	r7, r8, #2
  1c4:	ldr	r6, [r6, r7]
  1c8:	cmp	r6, #0
  1cc:	beq	0x1e8
  1d0:	mov	r8, #32
  1d4:	ldr	r6, [r6, r8]
  1d8:	add	r6, r6, #44
  1dc:	bx	r6
  1e0:	mov	r0, #0		; insn 13
  1e4:	mov	r1, #0
  1e8:	add	sp, sp, #596	; insn 14
  1ec:	pop	{r4, r5, r6, r7, r8, sl, pc}

For other sequences, the tail call could end up branching midway through
the following BPF instructions, or maybe off the end of the function,
leading to unknown behaviours.

Fixes: 39c13c204bb1 ("arm: eBPF JIT compiler")
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c
+++ b/arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c
@@ -949,7 +949,7 @@ static int emit_bpf_tail_call(struct jit
 	const u8 *tcc = bpf2a32[TCALL_CNT];
 	const int idx0 = ctx->idx;
 #define cur_offset (ctx->idx - idx0)
-#define jmp_offset (out_offset - (cur_offset))
+#define jmp_offset (out_offset - (cur_offset) - 2)
 	u32 off, lo, hi;
 
 	/* if (index >= array->map.max_entries)


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk are

queue-4.14/arm-net-bpf-fix-stack-alignment.patch
queue-4.14/arm-net-bpf-fix-ldx-instructions.patch
queue-4.14/arm-net-bpf-fix-register-saving.patch
queue-4.14/arm-net-bpf-move-stack-documentation.patch
queue-4.14/arm-net-bpf-correct-stack-layout-documentation.patch
queue-4.14/arm-net-bpf-clarify-tail_call-index.patch
queue-4.14/arm-net-bpf-avoid-bx-instruction-on-non-thumb-capable-cpus.patch
queue-4.14/arm-net-bpf-fix-tail-call-jumps.patch

                 reply	other threads:[~2018-01-26 10:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=151696299618154@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox