public inbox for stable@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: willemb@google.com, 001a1137452496ffc305617e5fe0@google.com,
	davem@davemloft.net, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
	jasowang@redhat.com, marcelo.leitner@gmail.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "gso: validate gso_type in GSO handlers" has been added to the 4.9-stable tree
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2018 17:39:39 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <151715757919875@kroah.com> (raw)


This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    gso: validate gso_type in GSO handlers

to the 4.9-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     gso-validate-gso_type-in-gso-handlers.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.9 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.


>From foo@baz Sun Jan 28 17:37:09 CET 2018
From: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2018 09:29:18 -0500
Subject: gso: validate gso_type in GSO handlers

From: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>


[ Upstream commit 121d57af308d0cf943f08f4738d24d3966c38cd9 ]

Validate gso_type during segmentation as SKB_GSO_DODGY sources
may pass packets where the gso_type does not match the contents.

Syzkaller was able to enter the SCTP gso handler with a packet of
gso_type SKB_GSO_TCPV4.

On entry of transport layer gso handlers, verify that the gso_type
matches the transport protocol.

Fixes: 90017accff61 ("sctp: Add GSO support")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/<001a1137452496ffc305617e5fe0@google.com>
Reported-by: syzbot+fee64147a25aecd48055@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
Acked-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 net/ipv4/tcp_offload.c   |    3 +++
 net/ipv4/udp_offload.c   |    3 +++
 net/ipv6/tcpv6_offload.c |    3 +++
 net/ipv6/udp_offload.c   |    3 +++
 net/sctp/offload.c       |    3 +++
 5 files changed, 15 insertions(+)

--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_offload.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_offload.c
@@ -32,6 +32,9 @@ static void tcp_gso_tstamp(struct sk_buf
 static struct sk_buff *tcp4_gso_segment(struct sk_buff *skb,
 					netdev_features_t features)
 {
+	if (!(skb_shinfo(skb)->gso_type & SKB_GSO_TCPV4))
+		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
+
 	if (!pskb_may_pull(skb, sizeof(struct tcphdr)))
 		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
 
--- a/net/ipv4/udp_offload.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/udp_offload.c
@@ -205,6 +205,9 @@ static struct sk_buff *udp4_ufo_fragment
 		goto out;
 	}
 
+	if (!(skb_shinfo(skb)->gso_type & SKB_GSO_UDP))
+		goto out;
+
 	if (!pskb_may_pull(skb, sizeof(struct udphdr)))
 		goto out;
 
--- a/net/ipv6/tcpv6_offload.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/tcpv6_offload.c
@@ -46,6 +46,9 @@ static struct sk_buff *tcp6_gso_segment(
 {
 	struct tcphdr *th;
 
+	if (!(skb_shinfo(skb)->gso_type & SKB_GSO_TCPV6))
+		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
+
 	if (!pskb_may_pull(skb, sizeof(*th)))
 		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
 
--- a/net/ipv6/udp_offload.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/udp_offload.c
@@ -55,6 +55,9 @@ static struct sk_buff *udp6_ufo_fragment
 		const struct ipv6hdr *ipv6h;
 		struct udphdr *uh;
 
+		if (!(skb_shinfo(skb)->gso_type & SKB_GSO_UDP))
+			goto out;
+
 		if (!pskb_may_pull(skb, sizeof(struct udphdr)))
 			goto out;
 
--- a/net/sctp/offload.c
+++ b/net/sctp/offload.c
@@ -44,6 +44,9 @@ static struct sk_buff *sctp_gso_segment(
 	struct sk_buff *segs = ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
 	struct sctphdr *sh;
 
+	if (!(skb_shinfo(skb)->gso_type & SKB_GSO_SCTP))
+		goto out;
+
 	sh = sctp_hdr(skb);
 	if (!pskb_may_pull(skb, sizeof(*sh)))
 		goto out;


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from willemb@google.com are

queue-4.9/gso-validate-gso_type-in-gso-handlers.patch
queue-4.9/flow_dissector-properly-cap-thoff-field.patch
queue-4.9/net-qdisc_pkt_len_init-should-be-more-robust.patch

                 reply	other threads:[~2018-01-28 16:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=151715757919875@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=001a1137452496ffc305617e5fe0@google.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=marcelo.leitner@gmail.com \
    --cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=willemb@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox