From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, bp@suse.de, dwmw2@infradead.org,
jpoimboe@redhat.com, keescook@google.com, tglx@linutronix.de
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "[PATCH] Revert "x86/alternative: Print unadorned pointers"" has been added to the 4.14-stable tree
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2018 10:15:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <151851334955129@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
[PATCH] Revert "x86/alternative: Print unadorned pointers"
to the 4.14-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
revert-x86-alternative-print-unadorned-pointers.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.14 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From ddf5d08f6fa96dd9f3911931079264d6099c6a51 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2018 10:14:14 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Revert "x86/alternative: Print unadorned pointers"
This reverts commit 67eb59b8ecfb319438706cee2cb67a3045b54494.
It's not needed in 4.14.y and only causes messy debugging messages, if
anyone actually cares about these random debug messages in the first
place (doubtful).
Reported-by: Kees Cook <keescook@google.com>
Acked-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: riel@redhat.com
Cc: ak@linux.intel.com
Cc: peterz@infradead.org
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Cc: jikos@kernel.org
Cc: luto@amacapital.net
Cc: dave.hansen@intel.com
Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Cc: keescook@google.com
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Cc: tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com
Cc: gregkh@linux-foundation.org
Cc: pjt@google.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c | 14 +++++++-------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
@@ -287,7 +287,7 @@ recompute_jump(struct alt_instr *a, u8 *
tgt_rip = next_rip + o_dspl;
n_dspl = tgt_rip - orig_insn;
- DPRINTK("target RIP: %px, new_displ: 0x%x", tgt_rip, n_dspl);
+ DPRINTK("target RIP: %p, new_displ: 0x%x", tgt_rip, n_dspl);
if (tgt_rip - orig_insn >= 0) {
if (n_dspl - 2 <= 127)
@@ -344,7 +344,7 @@ static void __init_or_module noinline op
add_nops(instr + (a->instrlen - a->padlen), a->padlen);
local_irq_restore(flags);
- DUMP_BYTES(instr, a->instrlen, "%px: [%d:%d) optimized NOPs: ",
+ DUMP_BYTES(instr, a->instrlen, "%p: [%d:%d) optimized NOPs: ",
instr, a->instrlen - a->padlen, a->padlen);
}
@@ -365,7 +365,7 @@ void __init_or_module noinline apply_alt
u8 *instr, *replacement;
u8 insnbuf[MAX_PATCH_LEN];
- DPRINTK("alt table %px, -> %px", start, end);
+ DPRINTK("alt table %p -> %p", start, end);
/*
* The scan order should be from start to end. A later scanned
* alternative code can overwrite previously scanned alternative code.
@@ -389,14 +389,14 @@ void __init_or_module noinline apply_alt
continue;
}
- DPRINTK("feat: %d*32+%d, old: (%px len: %d), repl: (%px, len: %d), pad: %d",
+ DPRINTK("feat: %d*32+%d, old: (%p, len: %d), repl: (%p, len: %d), pad: %d",
a->cpuid >> 5,
a->cpuid & 0x1f,
instr, a->instrlen,
replacement, a->replacementlen, a->padlen);
- DUMP_BYTES(instr, a->instrlen, "%px: old_insn: ", instr);
- DUMP_BYTES(replacement, a->replacementlen, "%px: rpl_insn: ", replacement);
+ DUMP_BYTES(instr, a->instrlen, "%p: old_insn: ", instr);
+ DUMP_BYTES(replacement, a->replacementlen, "%p: rpl_insn: ", replacement);
memcpy(insnbuf, replacement, a->replacementlen);
insnbuf_sz = a->replacementlen;
@@ -422,7 +422,7 @@ void __init_or_module noinline apply_alt
a->instrlen - a->replacementlen);
insnbuf_sz += a->instrlen - a->replacementlen;
}
- DUMP_BYTES(insnbuf, insnbuf_sz, "%px: final_insn: ", instr);
+ DUMP_BYTES(insnbuf, insnbuf_sz, "%p: final_insn: ", instr);
text_poke_early(instr, insnbuf, insnbuf_sz);
}
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from gregkh@linuxfoundation.org are
queue-4.14/crypto-tcrypt-fix-s-g-table-for-test_aead_speed.patch
queue-4.14/media-soc_camera-soc_scale_crop-add-missing-module_description-author-license.patch
queue-4.14/r8169-fix-rtl8168ep-take-too-long-to-complete-driver-initialization.patch
queue-4.14/tcp-release-sk_frag.page-in-tcp_disconnect.patch
queue-4.14/gitignore-move-.dtb-and-.dtb.s-patterns-to-the-top-level-.gitignore.patch
queue-4.14/net-igmp-add-a-missing-rcu-locking-section.patch
queue-4.14/soreuseport-fix-mem-leak-in-reuseport_add_sock.patch
queue-4.14/ipv6-fix-so_reuseport-udp-socket-with-implicit-sk_ipv6only.patch
queue-4.14/kbuild-rpm-pkg-keep-spec-file-until-make-mrproper.patch
queue-4.14/ip6mr-fix-stale-iterator.patch
queue-4.14/media-mtk-vcodec-add-missing-module_license-description.patch
queue-4.14/vhost_net-stop-device-during-reset-owner.patch
queue-4.14/revert-defer-call-to-mem_cgroup_sk_alloc.patch
queue-4.14/gitignore-sort-normal-pattern-rules-alphabetically.patch
queue-4.14/rocker-fix-possible-null-pointer-dereference-in-rocker_router_fib_event_work.patch
queue-4.14/revert-x86-alternative-print-unadorned-pointers.patch
queue-4.14/net-ipv6-send-unsolicited-na-after-dad.patch
queue-4.14/qlcnic-fix-deadlock-bug.patch
queue-4.14/scsi-storvsc-missing-error-code-in-storvsc_probe.patch
queue-4.14/qmi_wwan-add-support-for-quectel-ep06.patch
queue-4.14/tcp_bbr-fix-pacing_gain-to-always-be-unity-when-using-lt_bw.patch
queue-4.14/arch-define-weak-abort.patch
queue-4.14/kernel-exit.c-export-abort-to-modules.patch
reply other threads:[~2018-02-13 9:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=151851334955129@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=keescook@google.com \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox