From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: marc.zyngier@arm.com, ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, christoffer.dall@linaro.org,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, will.deacon@arm.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "[Variant 2/Spectre-v2] arm64: KVM: Increment PC after handling an SMC trap" has been added to the 4.15-stable tree
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2018 17:31:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1518539501131@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
[Variant 2/Spectre-v2] arm64: KVM: Increment PC after handling an SMC trap
to the 4.15-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
arm64-kvm-increment-pc-after-handling-an-smc-trap.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.15 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From foo@baz Tue Feb 13 17:25:10 CET 2018
From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2018 17:56:07 +0000
Subject: [Variant 2/Spectre-v2] arm64: KVM: Increment PC after handling an SMC trap
From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Commit f5115e8869e1 upstream.
When handling an SMC trap, the "preferred return address" is set
to that of the SMC, and not the next PC (which is a departure from
the behaviour of an SMC that isn't trapped).
Increment PC in the handler, as the guest is otherwise forever
stuck...
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: acfb3b883f6d ("arm64: KVM: Fix SMCCC handling of unimplemented SMC/HVC calls")
Reviewed-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c | 9 +++++++++
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c
@@ -54,7 +54,16 @@ static int handle_hvc(struct kvm_vcpu *v
static int handle_smc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
{
+ /*
+ * "If an SMC instruction executed at Non-secure EL1 is
+ * trapped to EL2 because HCR_EL2.TSC is 1, the exception is a
+ * Trap exception, not a Secure Monitor Call exception [...]"
+ *
+ * We need to advance the PC after the trap, as it would
+ * otherwise return to the same address...
+ */
vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, 0, ~0UL);
+ kvm_skip_instr(vcpu, kvm_vcpu_trap_il_is32bit(vcpu));
return 1;
}
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from marc.zyngier@arm.com are
queue-4.15/arm-arm64-smccc-make-function-identifiers-an-unsigned-quantity.patch
queue-4.15/arm64-move-bp-hardening-to-check_and_switch_context.patch
queue-4.15/arm-arm64-kvm-advertise-smccc-v1.1.patch
queue-4.15/arm64-move-post_ttbr_update_workaround-to-c-code.patch
queue-4.15/firmware-psci-expose-psci-conduit.patch
queue-4.15/arm64-force-kpti-to-be-disabled-on-cavium-thunderx.patch
queue-4.15/arm64-entry-apply-bp-hardening-for-high-priority-synchronous-exceptions.patch
queue-4.15/arm64-kpti-fix-the-interaction-between-asid-switching-and-software-pan.patch
queue-4.15/firmware-psci-expose-smccc-version-through-psci_ops.patch
queue-4.15/arm64-implement-branch-predictor-hardening-for-affected-cortex-a-cpus.patch
queue-4.15/arm-arm64-kvm-add-psci_version-helper.patch
queue-4.15/arm64-kill-psci_get_version-as-a-variant-2-workaround.patch
queue-4.15/arm64-entry-apply-bp-hardening-for-suspicious-interrupts-from-el0.patch
queue-4.15/arm64-capabilities-handle-duplicate-entries-for-a-capability.patch
queue-4.15/arm64-add-arm_smccc_arch_workaround_1-bp-hardening-support.patch
queue-4.15/arm-arm64-kvm-turn-kvm_psci_version-into-a-static-inline.patch
queue-4.15/arm-arm64-kvm-implement-psci-1.0-support.patch
queue-4.15/arm64-kvm-add-smccc_arch_workaround_1-fast-handling.patch
queue-4.15/arm64-kvm-report-smccc_arch_workaround_1-bp-hardening-support.patch
queue-4.15/arm-arm64-smccc-implement-smccc-v1.1-inline-primitive.patch
queue-4.15/arm64-idmap-use-awx-flags-for-.idmap.text-.pushsection-directives.patch
queue-4.15/arm64-kvm-make-psci_version-a-fast-path.patch
queue-4.15/arm64-cpufeature-__this_cpu_has_cap-shouldn-t-stop-early.patch
queue-4.15/arm64-kpti-add-enable-callback-to-remap-swapper-using-ng-mappings.patch
queue-4.15/arm-arm64-kvm-consolidate-the-psci-include-files.patch
queue-4.15/arm64-add-skeleton-to-harden-the-branch-predictor-against-aliasing-attacks.patch
queue-4.15/arm-arm64-kvm-add-smccc-accessors-to-psci-code.patch
queue-4.15/arm64-kvm-use-per-cpu-vector-when-bp-hardening-is-enabled.patch
queue-4.15/arm64-kvm-increment-pc-after-handling-an-smc-trap.patch
reply other threads:[~2018-02-13 16:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1518539501131@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=christoffer.dall@linaro.org \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox