From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from pic75-3-78-194-244-226.fbxo.proxad.net ([78.194.244.226]:48182 "EHLO mail.corsac.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751208AbeBQNcB (ORCPT ); Sat, 17 Feb 2018 08:32:01 -0500 Received: from scapa.corsac.net (unknown [IPv6:2a01:e34:ec2f:4e20:6af7:28ff:fe8d:2119]) by mail.corsac.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD4E598 for ; Sat, 17 Feb 2018 14:31:58 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <1518874313.9465.1.camel@debian.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/92] 4.9.81-stable review From: Yves-Alexis Perez To: Greg Kroah-Hartman , Guenter Roeck Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, shuahkh@osg.samsung.com, patches@kernelci.org, ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2018 14:31:53 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20180213152907.GA29190@kroah.com> References: <20180209133931.211869118@linuxfoundation.org> <556ea00b-e265-7f14-395c-c5e6629bf194@roeck-us.net> <20180213093651.GA29675@kroah.com> <7c1ed8b1-bd9c-4b9f-051b-f9f19591cdbb@roeck-us.net> <20180213152907.GA29190@kroah.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-0KqWLJlVAKpEBp3rXTfU" Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: --=-0KqWLJlVAKpEBp3rXTfU Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 2018-02-13 at 16:29 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_64.S: Assembler messages: > > arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_64.S:260: Error: unrecognized opcode: `rfi_to= _user' > > arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_64.S:270: Error: unrecognized opcode: `rfi_to= _kernel' > > arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_64.S:885: Error: unrecognized opcode: `rfi_to= _user' > > arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_64.S:900: Error: unrecognized opcode: `rfi_to= _kernel' > >=20 > > Looks like 222f20f140623 ("powerpc/64s: Simple RFI macro conversions") = is missing, > > or at least part of it. Unfortunately it doesn't apply cleanly. >=20 > Ugh. Let's see if the ppc developers care about this or not :) Hi, in Debian we extracted the following hunk from 222f20f140623 to fix build o= n powerpc/ppc64el. Only compile tested against Debian builds though. diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_64.S b/arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_64.= S index 3320bcac7192..e68faa4d1b13 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_64.S +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_64.S @@ -37,6 +37,11 @@ #include #include #include +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3S +#include +#else +#include +#endif =20 /* * System calls. --=20 Yves-Alexis --=-0KqWLJlVAKpEBp3rXTfU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCAAdFiEE8vi34Qgfo83x35gF3rYcyPpXRFsFAlqILskACgkQ3rYcyPpX RFvvjAf/VxMUQwjDQ73vuuniDP1a3g1jx5/ee0eqKhOHYV/hdyM2NYKqLxZL+QHg 3itjEEWrORgrapE7SH8h3DMD+SweIx6xt683QwTuHgFGNM12z9Y2K+OCoPPySQvS 3SbPEddn62NRpaMeNIT/ph3yO7NF4t3kWPIVuWnV1/fu3iJxkiSeCNEm0ixPUHG8 quzmBNG+rUzQubR4UmywDsTSRtmi5uUkU/e/U95LVFkhaSj5xjCif14vpUhdFj6J BvHlbmzcXJZk/h+zKc+scdPjIkT/2avFNgbJqKlYzj5lhBLs1dBJKwrC0umj2DNX ujtaWmxMJotR9Gc3gZ+Rhn26LFtuFQ== =fYC5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-0KqWLJlVAKpEBp3rXTfU--