From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, steffen.klassert@secunet.com,
syzkaller@googlegroups.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "xfrm: check id proto in validate_tmpl()" has been added to the 4.9-stable tree
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2018 08:31:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <151937110442181@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
xfrm: check id proto in validate_tmpl()
to the 4.9-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
xfrm-check-id-proto-in-validate_tmpl.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.9 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From 6a53b7593233ab9e4f96873ebacc0f653a55c3e1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2017 11:15:16 -0800
Subject: xfrm: check id proto in validate_tmpl()
From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
commit 6a53b7593233ab9e4f96873ebacc0f653a55c3e1 upstream.
syzbot reported a kernel warning in xfrm_state_fini(), which
indicates that we have entries left in the list
net->xfrm.state_all whose proto is zero. And
xfrm_id_proto_match() doesn't consider them as a match with
IPSEC_PROTO_ANY in this case.
Proto with value 0 is probably not a valid value, at least
verify_newsa_info() doesn't consider it valid either.
This patch fixes it by checking the proto value in
validate_tmpl() and rejecting invalid ones, like what iproute2
does in xfrm_xfrmproto_getbyname().
Reported-by: syzbot <syzkaller@googlegroups.com>
Cc: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c
@@ -1406,6 +1406,21 @@ static int validate_tmpl(int nr, struct
default:
return -EINVAL;
}
+
+ switch (ut[i].id.proto) {
+ case IPPROTO_AH:
+ case IPPROTO_ESP:
+ case IPPROTO_COMP:
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)
+ case IPPROTO_ROUTING:
+ case IPPROTO_DSTOPTS:
+#endif
+ case IPSEC_PROTO_ANY:
+ break;
+ default:
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
}
return 0;
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com are
queue-4.9/netfilter-xt_cgroup-initialize-info-priv-in-cgroup_mt_check_v1.patch
queue-4.9/netfilter-xt_rateest-acquire-xt_rateest_mutex-for-hash-insert.patch
queue-4.9/xfrm-check-id-proto-in-validate_tmpl.patch
reply other threads:[~2018-02-23 7:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=151937110442181@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=steffen.klassert@secunet.com \
--cc=syzkaller@googlegroups.com \
--cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).