public inbox for stable@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: jannh@google.com, alexander.levin@verizon.com,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, pablo@netfilter.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "netfilter: xt_bpf: add overflow checks" has been added to the 4.14-stable tree
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2018 12:10:55 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <151938425512134@kroah.com> (raw)


This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    netfilter: xt_bpf: add overflow checks

to the 4.14-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     netfilter-xt_bpf-add-overflow-checks.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.14 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.


>From foo@baz Fri Feb 23 11:45:09 CET 2018
From: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2017 01:46:07 +0100
Subject: netfilter: xt_bpf: add overflow checks

From: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>


[ Upstream commit 6ab405114b0b229151ef06f4e31c7834dd09d0c0 ]

Check whether inputs from userspace are too long (explicit length field too
big or string not null-terminated) to avoid out-of-bounds reads.

As far as I can tell, this can at worst lead to very limited kernel heap
memory disclosure or oopses.

This bug can be triggered by an unprivileged user even if the xt_bpf module
is not loaded: iptables is available in network namespaces, and the xt_bpf
module can be autoloaded.

Triggering the bug with a classic BPF filter with fake length 0x1000 causes
the following KASAN report:

==================================================================
BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in bpf_prog_create+0x84/0xf0
Read of size 32768 at addr ffff8801eff2c494 by task test/4627

CPU: 0 PID: 4627 Comm: test Not tainted 4.15.0-rc1+ #1
[...]
Call Trace:
 dump_stack+0x5c/0x85
 print_address_description+0x6a/0x260
 kasan_report+0x254/0x370
 ? bpf_prog_create+0x84/0xf0
 memcpy+0x1f/0x50
 bpf_prog_create+0x84/0xf0
 bpf_mt_check+0x90/0xd6 [xt_bpf]
[...]
Allocated by task 4627:
 kasan_kmalloc+0xa0/0xd0
 __kmalloc_node+0x47/0x60
 xt_alloc_table_info+0x41/0x70 [x_tables]
[...]
The buggy address belongs to the object at ffff8801eff2c3c0
                which belongs to the cache kmalloc-2048 of size 2048
The buggy address is located 212 bytes inside of
                2048-byte region [ffff8801eff2c3c0, ffff8801eff2cbc0)
[...]
==================================================================

Fixes: e6f30c731718 ("netfilter: x_tables: add xt_bpf match")
Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@verizon.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 net/netfilter/xt_bpf.c |    6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

--- a/net/netfilter/xt_bpf.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/xt_bpf.c
@@ -27,6 +27,9 @@ static int __bpf_mt_check_bytecode(struc
 {
 	struct sock_fprog_kern program;
 
+	if (len > XT_BPF_MAX_NUM_INSTR)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
 	program.len = len;
 	program.filter = insns;
 
@@ -55,6 +58,9 @@ static int __bpf_mt_check_path(const cha
 	mm_segment_t oldfs = get_fs();
 	int retval, fd;
 
+	if (strnlen(path, XT_BPF_PATH_MAX) == XT_BPF_PATH_MAX)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
 	set_fs(KERNEL_DS);
 	fd = bpf_obj_get_user(path);
 	set_fs(oldfs);


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from jannh@google.com are

queue-4.14/netfilter-xt_bpf-add-overflow-checks.patch

                 reply	other threads:[~2018-02-23 11:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=151938425512134@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=alexander.levin@verizon.com \
    --cc=jannh@google.com \
    --cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
    --cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox