Patch "i40e/i40evf: Account for frags split over multiple descriptors in check linearize" has been added to the 4.9-stable tree

Patch "i40e/i40evf: Account for frags split over multiple descriptors in check linearize" has been added to the 4.9-stable tree

[gregkh]

This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    i40e/i40evf: Account for frags split over multiple descriptors in check linearize

to the 4.9-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     i40e-i40evf-account-for-frags-split-over-multiple-descriptors-in-check-linearize.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.9 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.


>From foo@baz Wed Feb 28 16:13:29 CET 2018
From: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2017 10:55:04 -0800
Subject: i40e/i40evf: Account for frags split over multiple descriptors in check linearize

From: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com>


[ Upstream commit 248de22e638f10bd5bfc7624a357f940f66ba137 ]

The original code for __i40e_chk_linearize didn't take into account the
fact that if a fragment is 16K in size or larger it has to be split over 2
descriptors and the smaller of those 2 descriptors will be on the trailing
edge of the transmit. As a result we can get into situations where we didn't
catch requests that could result in a Tx hang.

This patch takes care of that by subtracting the length of all but the
trailing edge of the stale fragment before we test for sum. By doing this
we can guarantee that we have all cases covered, including the case of a
fragment that spans multiple descriptors. We don't need to worry about
checking the inner portions of this since 12K is the maximum aligned DMA
size and that is larger than any MSS will ever be since the MTU limit for
jumbos is something on the order of 9K.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com>
Tested-by: Andrew Bowers <andrewx.bowers@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_txrx.c   |   26 +++++++++++++++++++++++---
 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40evf/i40e_txrx.c |   26 +++++++++++++++++++++++---
 2 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_txrx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_txrx.c
@@ -2670,10 +2670,30 @@ bool __i40e_chk_linearize(struct sk_buff
 	/* Walk through fragments adding latest fragment, testing it, and
 	 * then removing stale fragments from the sum.
 	 */
-	stale = &skb_shinfo(skb)->frags[0];
-	for (;;) {
+	for (stale = &skb_shinfo(skb)->frags[0];; stale++) {
+		int stale_size = skb_frag_size(stale);
+
 		sum += skb_frag_size(frag++);
 
+		/* The stale fragment may present us with a smaller
+		 * descriptor than the actual fragment size. To account
+		 * for that we need to remove all the data on the front and
+		 * figure out what the remainder would be in the last
+		 * descriptor associated with the fragment.
+		 */
+		if (stale_size > I40E_MAX_DATA_PER_TXD) {
+			int align_pad = -(stale->page_offset) &
+					(I40E_MAX_READ_REQ_SIZE - 1);
+
+			sum -= align_pad;
+			stale_size -= align_pad;
+
+			do {
+				sum -= I40E_MAX_DATA_PER_TXD_ALIGNED;
+				stale_size -= I40E_MAX_DATA_PER_TXD_ALIGNED;
+			} while (stale_size > I40E_MAX_DATA_PER_TXD);
+		}
+
 		/* if sum is negative we failed to make sufficient progress */
 		if (sum < 0)
 			return true;
@@ -2681,7 +2701,7 @@ bool __i40e_chk_linearize(struct sk_buff
 		if (!nr_frags--)
 			break;
 
-		sum -= skb_frag_size(stale++);
+		sum -= stale_size;
 	}
 
 	return false;
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40evf/i40e_txrx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40evf/i40e_txrx.c
@@ -1872,10 +1872,30 @@ bool __i40evf_chk_linearize(struct sk_bu
 	/* Walk through fragments adding latest fragment, testing it, and
 	 * then removing stale fragments from the sum.
 	 */
-	stale = &skb_shinfo(skb)->frags[0];
-	for (;;) {
+	for (stale = &skb_shinfo(skb)->frags[0];; stale++) {
+		int stale_size = skb_frag_size(stale);
+
 		sum += skb_frag_size(frag++);
 
+		/* The stale fragment may present us with a smaller
+		 * descriptor than the actual fragment size. To account
+		 * for that we need to remove all the data on the front and
+		 * figure out what the remainder would be in the last
+		 * descriptor associated with the fragment.
+		 */
+		if (stale_size > I40E_MAX_DATA_PER_TXD) {
+			int align_pad = -(stale->page_offset) &
+					(I40E_MAX_READ_REQ_SIZE - 1);
+
+			sum -= align_pad;
+			stale_size -= align_pad;
+
+			do {
+				sum -= I40E_MAX_DATA_PER_TXD_ALIGNED;
+				stale_size -= I40E_MAX_DATA_PER_TXD_ALIGNED;
+			} while (stale_size > I40E_MAX_DATA_PER_TXD);
+		}
+
 		/* if sum is negative we failed to make sufficient progress */
 		if (sum < 0)
 			return true;
@@ -1883,7 +1903,7 @@ bool __i40evf_chk_linearize(struct sk_bu
 		if (!nr_frags--)
 			break;
 
-		sum -= skb_frag_size(stale++);
+		sum -= stale_size;
 	}
 
 	return false;


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from alexander.h.duyck@intel.com are

queue-4.9/i40e-i40evf-account-for-frags-split-over-multiple-descriptors-in-check-linearize.patch