From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: jwi@linux.vnet.ibm.com, davem@davemloft.net, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "s390/qeth: fix overestimated count of buffer elements" has been added to the 4.14-stable tree
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2018 19:30:41 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <152039344114171@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
s390/qeth: fix overestimated count of buffer elements
to the 4.14-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
s390-qeth-fix-overestimated-count-of-buffer-elements.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.14 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From foo@baz Tue Mar 6 19:02:12 PST 2018
From: Julian Wiedmann <jwi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2018 18:58:12 +0100
Subject: s390/qeth: fix overestimated count of buffer elements
From: Julian Wiedmann <jwi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
[ Upstream commit 12472af89632beb1ed8dea29d4efe208ca05b06a ]
qeth_get_elements_for_range() doesn't know how to handle a 0-length
range (ie. start == end), and returns 1 when it should return 0.
Such ranges occur on TSO skbs, where the L2/L3/L4 headers (and thus all
of the skb's linear data) are skipped when mapping the skb into regular
buffer elements.
This overestimation may cause several performance-related issues:
1. sub-optimal IO buffer selection, where the next buffer gets selected
even though the skb would actually still fit into the current buffer.
2. forced linearization, if the element count for a non-linear skb
exceeds QETH_MAX_BUFFER_ELEMENTS.
Rather than modifying qeth_get_elements_for_range() and adding overhead
to every caller, fix up those callers that are in risk of passing a
0-length range.
Fixes: 2863c61334aa ("qeth: refactor calculation of SBALE count")
Signed-off-by: Julian Wiedmann <jwi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/s390/net/qeth_core_main.c | 10 ++++++----
drivers/s390/net/qeth_l3_main.c | 11 ++++++-----
2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/s390/net/qeth_core_main.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/net/qeth_core_main.c
@@ -3861,10 +3861,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(qeth_get_elements_for_
int qeth_get_elements_no(struct qeth_card *card,
struct sk_buff *skb, int extra_elems, int data_offset)
{
- int elements = qeth_get_elements_for_range(
- (addr_t)skb->data + data_offset,
- (addr_t)skb->data + skb_headlen(skb)) +
- qeth_get_elements_for_frags(skb);
+ addr_t end = (addr_t)skb->data + skb_headlen(skb);
+ int elements = qeth_get_elements_for_frags(skb);
+ addr_t start = (addr_t)skb->data + data_offset;
+
+ if (start != end)
+ elements += qeth_get_elements_for_range(start, end);
if ((elements + extra_elems) > QETH_MAX_BUFFER_ELEMENTS(card)) {
QETH_DBF_MESSAGE(2, "Invalid size of IP packet "
--- a/drivers/s390/net/qeth_l3_main.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/net/qeth_l3_main.c
@@ -2633,11 +2633,12 @@ static void qeth_tso_fill_header(struct
static int qeth_l3_get_elements_no_tso(struct qeth_card *card,
struct sk_buff *skb, int extra_elems)
{
- addr_t tcpdptr = (addr_t)tcp_hdr(skb) + tcp_hdrlen(skb);
- int elements = qeth_get_elements_for_range(
- tcpdptr,
- (addr_t)skb->data + skb_headlen(skb)) +
- qeth_get_elements_for_frags(skb);
+ addr_t start = (addr_t)tcp_hdr(skb) + tcp_hdrlen(skb);
+ addr_t end = (addr_t)skb->data + skb_headlen(skb);
+ int elements = qeth_get_elements_for_frags(skb);
+
+ if (start != end)
+ elements += qeth_get_elements_for_range(start, end);
if ((elements + extra_elems) > QETH_MAX_BUFFER_ELEMENTS(card)) {
QETH_DBF_MESSAGE(2,
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from jwi@linux.vnet.ibm.com are
queue-4.14/s390-qeth-fix-setip-command-handling.patch
queue-4.14/s390-qeth-fix-ip-address-lookup-for-l3-devices.patch
queue-4.14/s390-qeth-fix-ipa-command-submission-race.patch
queue-4.14/revert-s390-qeth-fix-using-of-ref-counter-for-rxip-addresses.patch
queue-4.14/s390-qeth-fix-overestimated-count-of-buffer-elements.patch
queue-4.14/s390-qeth-fix-double-free-on-ip-add-remove-race.patch
queue-4.14/s390-qeth-fix-ip-removal-on-offline-cards.patch
queue-4.14/s390-qeth-fix-underestimated-count-of-buffer-elements.patch
reply other threads:[~2018-03-07 3:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=152039344114171@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jwi@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).