From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: jwi@linux.vnet.ibm.com, davem@davemloft.net, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "s390/qeth: fix double-free on IP add/remove race" has been added to the 4.15-stable tree
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2018 19:31:34 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <152039349419483@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
s390/qeth: fix double-free on IP add/remove race
to the 4.15-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
s390-qeth-fix-double-free-on-ip-add-remove-race.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.15 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From foo@baz Tue Mar 6 19:02:57 PST 2018
From: Julian Wiedmann <jwi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2018 18:58:14 +0100
Subject: s390/qeth: fix double-free on IP add/remove race
From: Julian Wiedmann <jwi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
[ Upstream commit 14d066c3531a87f727968cacd85bd95c75f59843 ]
Registering an IPv4 address with the HW takes quite a while, so we
temporarily drop the ip_htable lock. Any concurrent add/remove of the
same IP adjusts the IP's use count, and (on remove) is then blocked by
addr->in_progress.
After the register call has completed, we check the use count for
concurrently attempted add/remove calls - and possibly straight-away
deregister the IP again. This happens via l3_delete_ip(), which
1) looks up the queried IP in the htable (getting a reference to the
*same* queried object),
2) deregisters the IP from the HW, and
3) frees the IP object.
The caller in l3_add_ip() then does a second free on the same object.
For this case, skip all the extra checks and lookups in l3_delete_ip()
and just deregister & free the IP object ourselves.
Fixes: 5f78e29ceebf ("qeth: optimize IP handling in rx_mode callback")
Signed-off-by: Julian Wiedmann <jwi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/s390/net/qeth_l3_main.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/drivers/s390/net/qeth_l3_main.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/net/qeth_l3_main.c
@@ -320,7 +320,8 @@ int qeth_l3_add_ip(struct qeth_card *car
(rc == IPA_RC_LAN_OFFLINE)) {
addr->disp_flag = QETH_DISP_ADDR_DO_NOTHING;
if (addr->ref_counter < 1) {
- qeth_l3_delete_ip(card, addr);
+ qeth_l3_deregister_addr_entry(card, addr);
+ hash_del(&addr->hnode);
kfree(addr);
}
} else {
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from jwi@linux.vnet.ibm.com are
queue-4.15/s390-qeth-fix-setip-command-handling.patch
queue-4.15/s390-qeth-fix-ip-address-lookup-for-l3-devices.patch
queue-4.15/s390-qeth-fix-ipa-command-submission-race.patch
queue-4.15/revert-s390-qeth-fix-using-of-ref-counter-for-rxip-addresses.patch
queue-4.15/s390-qeth-fix-overestimated-count-of-buffer-elements.patch
queue-4.15/s390-qeth-fix-double-free-on-ip-add-remove-race.patch
queue-4.15/s390-qeth-fix-ip-removal-on-offline-cards.patch
queue-4.15/s390-qeth-fix-underestimated-count-of-buffer-elements.patch
reply other threads:[~2018-03-07 3:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=152039349419483@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jwi@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).