From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga04.intel.com ([192.55.52.120]:11850 "EHLO mga04.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752059AbeCHPed (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Mar 2018 10:34:33 -0500 Message-ID: <1520523268.20980.43.camel@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] ubi: Reject MLC NAND From: Artem Bityutskiy Reply-To: dedekind1@gmail.com To: Richard Weinberger Cc: Linus Walleij , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Cyrille Pitchen , Mark Vasut , Boris BREZILLON , Brian Norris , David Woodhouse , tharvey@gateworks.com, stable , Ulf Hansson Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2018 17:34:28 +0200 In-Reply-To: <10429741.dU3vzh71GH@blindfold> References: <20180303104554.5958-1-richard@nod.at> <3797589.z8fAhu5iDP@blindfold> <1520521275.20980.41.camel@gmail.com> <10429741.dU3vzh71GH@blindfold> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, 2018-03-08 at 16:28 +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote: > You mean *not* widely used? Yes, indeed, thanks for correction. MLC just wasn't there yet when UBI/UBIFS were upstreamed.